A review and comparison of Hoka One One running shoes
The Hoka shoes started the 'maximum cushioning, minimum drop' style of shoe with their thick, softly cushioned soles. They reduce the pounding on the soles of your feet, but they are not without their downsides. The Hokas are one of my recommended running shoes, but I think the Altra Olympus/Altra Paradigm is a 'better Hoka'. I've included some recommendations to help you evaluate if Hokas are right for you.
Hoka One One, pronounced "Hoka O-nay O-nay", means "now it is time to fly" in Maori. These shoes have midsoles that are much thicker and softer than traditional shoes. The soles are also wider to prevent the higher soles making the shoes unstable, like stilts. However, the sole is not as thick as it appears from the outside, as you can see from the image below. The foam in the midsole comes up the sides of the shoe much higher.
2 The Hoka Advantages
- The Hokas provide remarkable protection for the soles of your feet. This protection is most noticeable on trails, where you can ignore far more of the stones and bumps. I've found this protection to be wonderful, as it has allowed me to run trails again, which would not otherwise be possible. Even on smoother surfaces, the Hokas can protect your soles, which is a factor over longer distances.
- Most of the Hokas are very softly cushioned, though Hoka are using a firmer RMAT foam in some of their shoes that seems hard by comparison.
- The Hokas have far less of a drop between the heel and forefoot than a traditional shoe. The Hokas have claim 3-4.5mm of drop, but measurements suggest it's more like 6mm. Compared with a traditional running shoe like the Asics GT 2000 which has 9mm of drop, the Hokas seem quite flat. I've found that running in Hokas is a little like running barefoot on a padded track, which is quite impressive.
- The Hokas are remarkably light for their size, and other than the Mafete, they are comparable with a slightly heavier traditional running shoe. The Hoka Clifton is actually quite a light shoe and comparable with some minimalist shoes.
- The thick sole tapers from the forefoot to the front of the shoe, creating an effect that encourages a good forward lean and toe off. I've been surprised how much this has helped my biomechanics.
- There are many reports that the Hokas reduce Muscle fatigue, but I found no obvious difference in muscular soreness between the Hokas and the Modified Nike Free. Opinions of other runners going to Hokas from minimalist shoes varies, with some seeing a benefit and others not.
- While the Hokas are expensive ($170 in the US), but most runners find they last longer than a traditional running shoe, so the overall costs are lower. Of course, they don't last as long as some minimalist shoes; I get 2,000+ miles out of my Modified Nike Frees, but I only get I around 600 miles out of my Hokas.
3 The Hoka Problems
- The thick sole of the Hokas produces a greater ankle stress on uneven surfaces. The wider sole reduces this problem a little, but when trail running this is still an issue. In the past I have never had trouble with twisting my ankles, but the Hokas did cause some ankle stress and pain.
- The added cushioning protects the soles of the feet, but I've found I've had joint stress with the Hokas that I've never had with my Modified Nike Free. This is in line with the research that has shown greater joint stress with greater cushioning.
- Even though the cushioning of the Hokas is far softer than other shoes, the thickness makes them quite stiff. This reduces the natural flexing of the foot, but it also puts extra stress on some areas of your foot. The skin on the back of the heel has more friction and the tendons under where the laces are tied have more pressure. I've found that Lacing the Hokas loosely limits the tendon stress, and my favored sock combination mitigates the friction.
- I've found my Running Form tends to degrade while running in the Hokas rather than my Modified Nike Free. When I swap back, it takes a few miles for my form to recover. I've also noticed that my Cadence is lower in the Hokas, but this might be due to the extra weight.
- The toe box of the Hokas is rather tight for many people which causes blisters (see below).
- I didn't like the speed Lacing system that comes with the Hokas, but it's easy to replace them with traditional laces. Hoka includes alternative laces, but I found they were too slippery to stay knotted.
4 Hoka Blisters
I've seen a distinctive pattern of blisters associated with the Hokas, where the blister forms part way along the toes, normally between the big toe and the next toe along, and sometimes between the little toe and its neighbor. I saw a disproportionate number of Hoka wearing runners with this blister pattern at the Umstead 100. This can be avoided by cutting open the toe box, but far too few people do this.
My recommendation depends on what type of runner you are.
The numbers in the decision chart above correspond to the notes below:
- Do you suffer from twisted or weak ankles? Hokas are likely to make this problem worse.
- Avoid Hokas, but consider minimalist shoes
- Are your current shoes traditional or minimalist?
- Are you willing to try out minimalist shoes? I'm a big proponent of minimalist footwear, but I realize not everyone wants to try it out.
- See how one of these minimalist shoes works for you.
- Try the Hokas, starting with the Hoka Clifton.
- How far do you run? Hokas may have some advantages over minimalist shoes for longer ultramarathons.
- Try the Hokas for your longer runs. Obviously test them out on shorter runs and build up, but I'd recommend using the Hokas for the long stuff and the minimalist shoes for the rest.
- Do you run on rough trails, where your feet may get sore from stone bruises?
- Try one of the trail Hokas, like the Stinson Evo or even the Mafate 2 if you want more protection.
- You're probably best staying with the minimalist footwear, though it may be worth trying out a pair of Hokas.
I'd suggest getting your shoes from somewhere with free shipping both ways, like Zappos, who also have one of the best selections of Hoka shoes I've found. (While Road Runner Sports has the advantage of letting you run in shoes and still return them for an exchange, they don't stock Hokas.)
6 Hoka or Altra?
While Hoka was the first company to produce the Minimax style of shoe, but Altra has started to produce comparable shoes. The Altra key selling points are zero drop (no high heel) and a shape that matches the human foot. Initially the Altra shoes were minimalist, with thin, firm midsoles, but they have introduced some thicker, softly cushioned shoes such as the Altra Olympus. At the same time, Hoka has moved to thinner, firmer shoes such as the Rapi Nui, Conquest or huaka. I've run in both Hoka and Altra shoes, even swapping between them during 100 miles races. As you can see from the picture of the dissected shoes above, the shoes are quite similar, but the Hoka has a much more abrupt taper of the midsole at the front of the shoe. I find the Altra a better Minimax shoe than the Hoka range, but things may change as each manufacturer evolves (or devolves) their product range.
7 Comparison of the Shoes in the Hoka Range
Here's a short summer of the shoes in the Hoka range.
- Hoka Clifton. This newer shoe has replaced the Bondi is my favorite of the Hoka range. It feels just like a Bondi, but is significantly lighter, and a little more durable. Like all Hokas, the Bondi has a horribly small toe box, it's easily modified.
- Hoka Bondi. Until Hoka produced the Clifton, the various Bondi shoes (Bondi B, Bondi 2, Bondi 3 and Bondi Speed) were my favorites.
- Hoka Stinson. The Stinson is a little heavier and thicker than the Bondi variants, and is available in road (Lite) and trail (ATR) versions.
- Hoka Mafate Speed. The Mafate is a huge shoe, and the heaviest and thickest of the Hokas.
Hoka have started to use a new type of foam called RMAT that lasts much longer than traditional EVA foam, but it's heavier and much firmer. The result is a shoe that looks like the usual Hoka, but is far too firm. You can find shoes weighting the same that are vastly softer, or shoes that are similar in cushioning that are vastly lighter. I avoid any Hoka that uses RMAT in the midsole, which includes:
- Hoka Conquest. While this is as big and heavy as a Hoka Bondi, the overly firm RMAT foam ruins the shoe.
- Hoka Huaka. The Huaka, like the conquest, uses RMAT foam that is hard wearing, but excessively firm.
- Hoka Rapa Nui 2. The Rapa Nui 2 is lighter, thinner and a little cheaper than the other Hokas, but I found it even firmer than the Conquest. The Adidas Energy Boost feels far more cushioned to me, though it does not offer the same level of protection from stones or uneven surfaces.
Hoka has announced some new shoes which should be available soon, as well as updates to the Conquest and Bondi 3.
- Challenger ATR. This is the trail version of the awesome Hoka Clifton.
- Constant. This looks like a Hoka is trying to add a medial post to prevent pronation. The Science of Running Shoes has shown these techniques are ineffective, and more likely to cause problems can help. I'd expect the shoe to be less cushioned and heavier, especially with the inclusion of the dreaded RMAT. This promises to be a truly awful shoe.
- Valor. This is a Hoka that only uses EVA foam, not the harder RMAT, with a 36/32mm sole and probably in the middle of the Hoka weight range.
- Vanquish. This shoe has a combination of EVA foam and RMAT, with a 34mm/30mm sole, and may be on the heavy side.
- Odyssey. The Odyssey might be nearly as light as the Clifton, but with a thicker sole (35/30mm).
8 A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes
For a more detailed comparison of these shoes see the Recommendations for Best Running Shoes. This table lists the key attributes of What to Look for in Running Shoes. For more detailed information, on the shoes see detailed shoe comparison.
|Full Review||Rating|| Recommended
|Saucony Type A6||5.5||$100||5.3||6.1||9.5||17||21||4||5.0||8||3|
|Adidas Adios Boost||1.7||$140||3.0||8.6||13.4||17||27||11||4.0||7||4|
|Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review||6.0||$95||4.1||7.0||10.9||15||18||2||4.5||9||2|
|Hoka Bondi Review||5.8||$150||5.2||10.9||17.0||41||45||5||8.8||0||3|
|Hoka Clifton Review||9.4||$130||6.1||8.2||12.8||28||32||4||7.8||5||3|
|On Cloudracer Review||2.5||$130||3.7||8.2||12.8||19||27||5||4.7||8||3|
|Hoka Conquest Review||3.1||$170||3.2||11.9||18.5||28||34||5||6.0||3||3|
|Mizuno Cursoris Review||7.2||$120||3.5||6.4||12.4||17||17||-1||4.4||7||1|
|Asics Gel DS Racer 10 Review||5.3||$110||5.3||7.0||10.9||21||26||6||5.8||6||3|
|Mizuno Wave Ekiden||2.6||$115||2.2||5.7||14.6||13||18||6||3.2||8||3|
|Adidas Energy Boost Review||4.4||$160||4.6||10.0||15.6||20||30||7||7.2||6||4|
|Puma Faas 100 R||7.2||$90||5.4||6.1||9.4||15||20||1||5.1||9||2|
|Nike Free 4.0 Review||3.3||$120||3.2||8.2||13.6||24||30||6||4.4||6||3|
|Asics Gel Lyte 33 3 Review||3.8||$90||5.1||7.3||11.4||17||24||4||5.8||9||3|
|Skechers GOmeb Speed||2.9||$120||2.5||7.3||15.4||16||22||2||3.8||8||2|
|Skechers GOrun Ultra Review||3.3||$80||5.4||9.3||14.5||26||40||10||7.8||7||1|
|Asics GT 2000 Review||3.7||$120||3.1||11.2||17.4||28||35||5||5.4||4||3|
|Saucony Hattori Review||2.7||$80||1.3||4.6||19.5||11||11||1||2.6||9||2|
|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 Review||8.4||$85||6.5||5.9||9.2||19||25||5||6.0||8||3|
|Altra Instinct 2 Review||8.0||$130||3.8||10.6||16.5||23||23||0||6.3||6||3|
|Saucony Kinvara 5 Review||5.8||$100||4.9||7.9||12.3||18||24||5||6.1||8||2|
|Hoka Mafate Speed Review||6.1||$170||4.9||11.9||18.5||39||40||4||9.0||3||2|
|Pearl Izumi EM Road N0 Review||4.5||$100||4.5||6.9||10.7||15||20||6||4.8||8||3|
|New Balance 980 Review||3.1||$110||2.9||10.1||15.7||21||30||5||4.6||5||3|
|Altra Olympus Review||5.5||$130||3.5||11.8||18.4||27||27||3||6.4||4||3|
|Altra One2 Review||8.2||$100||5.3||7.3||11.4||19||19||0||6.0||8||1|
|Altra Paradigm Review||7.2||$130||4.1||9.9||15.4||25||25||1||6.4||4||3|
|Brooks PureCadence 3 Review||5.5||$120||4.5||9.4||14.6||24||29||1||6.5||7||2|
|Brooks PureConnect 3 Review||4.6||$100||3.7||9.0||13.9||20||23||0||5.2||7||2|
|Brooks PureFlow 3 Review||2.7||$100||3.5||9.5||14.8||22||27||3||5.2||7||2|
|New Balance RC1600||6.6||$110||5.6||5.6||8.7||15||21||5||4.9||8||3|
|New Balance RC5000 Review||10.0||$125||7.8||3.4||5.3||13||17||3||4.2||8||3|
|Skechers GoRun Ride||3.0||$85||3.8||8.5||13.2||18||28||6||5.0||9||1|
|Hoka Stinson Lite Review||6.6||$160||4.7||11.6||18.1||35||40||6||8.5||2||3|
|Nike Zoom Streak LT 2 Review||7.6||$75||6.0||5.5||8.6||15||19||4||5.2||9||3|
|Adidas Takumi Sen 2 Review||2.2||$150||2.0||6.9||16.5||17||22||6||3.2||7||3|
|Altra Torin Review||6.7||$120||4.0||9.0||14.0||20||20||3||5.5||5||3|
|Merrell Trail Glove 3 Review||4.6||$100||0.8||6.9||24.7||11||11||0||2.0||9||5|
|Brooks Transcend 2 Review||3.3||$170||3.3||12.6||19.6||30||36||6||6.5||4||3|
|Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review||5.8||$125||3.1||3.1||10.6||9||12||1||3.3||9||2|
|Saucony Virrata 2 Review||6.2||$90||4.5||7.3||11.4||20||20||1||5.1||8||2|