Difference between revisions of "Puma Faas 100 R"

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ Review}} The Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ is a wonderful shoe, and comes close to one of my favorites, the Asics Gel Hyper Speed. While the F...")
 
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* {{H:flexibility}}. The lack of outsole, combined with the thin, soft midsole makes the Faas 100 R very flexible.  
 
* {{H:flexibility}}. The lack of outsole, combined with the thin, soft midsole makes the Faas 100 R very flexible.  
 
* {{H:outsole}}. It seems like shoe designers have to do something stupid on every shoe, and with the Faas 100 R‏‎ it's the placement of the firmer outsole. There's a tiny bit of outsole under the extreme edge of the heel and under the front of the big toe, and neither of these should be high abrasion areas. There's also a small circle that's in the middle of the shoe and slightly recessed, which is even more bizarre. This design flaw means the Faas 100 R is slightly heavier than it should be and does not have the longevity benefits that some well-placed outsole would bring. In fact, the Faas 100 R wears fairly quickly, though how quickly will depend a lot on your biomechanics, the roughness and temperature of the surface. The pattern in the sole of the shoe can trap some tiny stones, but they're too small to cause many problems.  
 
* {{H:outsole}}. It seems like shoe designers have to do something stupid on every shoe, and with the Faas 100 R‏‎ it's the placement of the firmer outsole. There's a tiny bit of outsole under the extreme edge of the heel and under the front of the big toe, and neither of these should be high abrasion areas. There's also a small circle that's in the middle of the shoe and slightly recessed, which is even more bizarre. This design flaw means the Faas 100 R is slightly heavier than it should be and does not have the longevity benefits that some well-placed outsole would bring. In fact, the Faas 100 R wears fairly quickly, though how quickly will depend a lot on your biomechanics, the roughness and temperature of the surface. The pattern in the sole of the shoe can trap some tiny stones, but they're too small to cause many problems.  
−
* {{H:shape}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ is much better shaped than most shoes, and while I did [[Shoe Modifications| cut open the toe box]] the problem was fairly minimal. .
+
* {{H:shape}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ is much better shaped than most shoes, and while I did [[Shoe Modifications| cut open the toe box]] the problem was fairly minimal. {{H:TryCuttingShoes}}
 
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible, seamless, and thin enough to breathe well. There's no padding other than a tiny bit around the ankle opening. For such a minimalist upper, it's quite comfortable, though the ankle opening could do with being a little softer.  
 
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible, seamless, and thin enough to breathe well. There's no padding other than a tiny bit around the ankle opening. For such a minimalist upper, it's quite comfortable, though the ankle opening could do with being a little softer.  
 
* {{H:tongue}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has a traditional tongue, but there's no tab to attach it to the laces, so I found it tended to slide down into the shoe. The tongue has a small square of padding, but is otherwise thin fabric.
 
* {{H:tongue}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has a traditional tongue, but there's no tab to attach it to the laces, so I found it tended to slide down into the shoe. The tongue has a small square of padding, but is otherwise thin fabric.
 
* {{H:lacing}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has one other flaw - round laces. These tend to come untied, but they can be replaced easily enough.  
 
* {{H:lacing}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has one other flaw - round laces. These tend to come untied, but they can be replaced easily enough.  
 
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has no heel counter, which is nice.  
 
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has no heel counter, which is nice.  
−
{{BuyShoes|RRS=T|AZ=T}}
+
{{FastBlr|puma/faas-100-r-567|567|Puma Faas 100 R}}
−
{{ShoeGraphs}}
 
 
=How Far Can I Run in the Faas 100 R? =
 
=How Far Can I Run in the Faas 100 R? =
 
Different runners want different levels of cushioning, so this shoe may not suit everyone. Some runners want a [[Minimax]] shoe when they run a 5K, while others will run a 100 mile race barefoot. Most people find that as the distance increases, they want a little more cushioning to protect their feet from the pounding and to offset a little of the fatigue that sets in over time. You can see from the charts below how the cushioning compares with other shoes I've tested for some comparisons. Remember that a thicker, firmer shoe would have the same cushioning rating as a thinner, softer shoe, but would feel rather different. Personally, I'm happy running in the Faas 100 R for the marathon distance, and I'd probably use it in a 50 mile road race. For longer distances I'd probably use the [[Hoka Clifton]], either for the entire race or for the last portion.  
 
Different runners want different levels of cushioning, so this shoe may not suit everyone. Some runners want a [[Minimax]] shoe when they run a 5K, while others will run a 100 mile race barefoot. Most people find that as the distance increases, they want a little more cushioning to protect their feet from the pounding and to offset a little of the fatigue that sets in over time. You can see from the charts below how the cushioning compares with other shoes I've tested for some comparisons. Remember that a thicker, firmer shoe would have the same cushioning rating as a thinner, softer shoe, but would feel rather different. Personally, I'm happy running in the Faas 100 R for the marathon distance, and I'd probably use it in a 50 mile road race. For longer distances I'd probably use the [[Hoka Clifton]], either for the entire race or for the last portion.  
Line 41: Line 40:
 
|[[File:Asics-Gel-Hyper-Speed-6-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 outside]]  
 
|[[File:Asics-Gel-Hyper-Speed-6-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 outside]]  
 
|}
 
|}
 +
{{FastBlr|asics/gel-hyperspeed-6-192|192|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6}}
 
==Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and New Balance RC5000==
 
==Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and New Balance RC5000==
 
Few shoes can compare with the ultralight [[New Balance RC5000]]. The RC5000 is a better shoe if you can handle the limited cushioning, but the Faas 100 R is going to work better for most folks.   
 
Few shoes can compare with the ultralight [[New Balance RC5000]]. The RC5000 is a better shoe if you can handle the limited cushioning, but the Faas 100 R is going to work better for most folks.   
Line 55: Line 55:
 
|[[File:New-Balance-MRC-5000-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|New Balance MRC 5000 outside]]
 
|[[File:New-Balance-MRC-5000-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|New Balance MRC 5000 outside]]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
{{FastBlr|new-balance/rc5000-v1-852|852|New Balance RC5000}}
 
==Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and Asics GT 2000==
 
==Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and Asics GT 2000==
 
I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the [[Asics GT 2000]]. The GT 2000 really shows how good the Faas 100 R is, weighing just over half as much while providing almost the same cushioning. The Puma lacks the over engineering and complexity of the GT 2000 and its simplicity is a key benefit.  
 
I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the [[Asics GT 2000]]. The GT 2000 really shows how good the Faas 100 R is, weighing just over half as much while providing almost the same cushioning. The Puma lacks the over engineering and complexity of the GT 2000 and its simplicity is a key benefit.  
Line 69: Line 70:
 
|[[File:Asics-GT2000-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics GT2000 outside]]
 
|[[File:Asics-GT2000-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics GT2000 outside]]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
{{ShoeGraphs}}
 
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
 
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
 
{{:Shoes-include}}
 
{{:Shoes-include}}

Revision as of 17:30, 14 September 2015

The Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ is a wonderful shoe, and comes close to one of my favorites, the Asics Gel Hyper Speed. While the Faas 100 R is marketed as a 'racing flat', I believe it should be considered it an optimal shoe, providing everything most runners need without the weight penalty of the futile over engineering that traditional running shoes suffer from. The Faas 100 R provides the cushioning of shoes weighing far more, without sacrificing much comfort. The Faas 100 R is let down a little by the lack of outsole, so it may not last as long as shoes like the Hyper Speed. (I use The Science of Running Shoes as the basis of how I test running shoes and what you should look for in a running shoe.)

Puma Faas 100 R top
Puma Faas 100 R bottom
Puma Faas 100 R inside
Puma Faas 100 R outside

1 Characteristics

  • Why you’d buy it. This is a great shoe and I'd highly recommend it. It's relatively cheap, and offers great cushioning-to-weight.
  • Cushioning . The Faas 100 R‏‎ is quite close to the Asics Gel Hyper Speed, with virtually the same forefoot cushioning and slightly less heel cushioning. For its weight, the Faas 100 R provides wonderful cushioning, feeling soft underfoot and smooth.
  • Drop. The Faas 100 R is virtually zero-drop, with only 1mm of drop when loaded.
  • Structure. The Faas 100 R uses a single density, so it does not interfere with your biomechanics, nor is there any 'arch support' to cause foot problems.
  • Flexibility. The lack of outsole, combined with the thin, soft midsole makes the Faas 100 R very flexible.
  • Outsole. It seems like shoe designers have to do something stupid on every shoe, and with the Faas 100 R‏‎ it's the placement of the firmer outsole. There's a tiny bit of outsole under the extreme edge of the heel and under the front of the big toe, and neither of these should be high abrasion areas. There's also a small circle that's in the middle of the shoe and slightly recessed, which is even more bizarre. This design flaw means the Faas 100 R is slightly heavier than it should be and does not have the longevity benefits that some well-placed outsole would bring. In fact, the Faas 100 R wears fairly quickly, though how quickly will depend a lot on your biomechanics, the roughness and temperature of the surface. The pattern in the sole of the shoe can trap some tiny stones, but they're too small to cause many problems.
  • Shape. The Faas 100 R‏‎ is much better shaped than most shoes, and while I did cut open the toe box the problem was fairly minimal. (I recommend cutting open the toe box of virtually all running shoes, with the exception of a few shoes like some Altra shoes. When you have some worn out shoes, you should try cutting open the toe box. I've found that it's a big improvement, allowing my toes to move naturally and engage for toe off, as well as reducing the possibility of blisters.)
  • Upper. The upper is inflexible, seamless, and thin enough to breathe well. There's no padding other than a tiny bit around the ankle opening. For such a minimalist upper, it's quite comfortable, though the ankle opening could do with being a little softer.
  • Tongue. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has a traditional tongue, but there's no tab to attach it to the laces, so I found it tended to slide down into the shoe. The tongue has a small square of padding, but is otherwise thin fabric.
  • Lacing. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has one other flaw - round laces. These tend to come untied, but they can be replaced easily enough.
  • Heel Counter. The Faas 100 R‏‎ has no heel counter, which is nice.
helping-hand.jpg
Please support this site

This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.


2 How Far Can I Run in the Faas 100 R?

Different runners want different levels of cushioning, so this shoe may not suit everyone. Some runners want a Minimax shoe when they run a 5K, while others will run a 100 mile race barefoot. Most people find that as the distance increases, they want a little more cushioning to protect their feet from the pounding and to offset a little of the fatigue that sets in over time. You can see from the charts below how the cushioning compares with other shoes I've tested for some comparisons. Remember that a thicker, firmer shoe would have the same cushioning rating as a thinner, softer shoe, but would feel rather different. Personally, I'm happy running in the Faas 100 R for the marathon distance, and I'd probably use it in a 50 mile road race. For longer distances I'd probably use the Hoka Clifton, either for the entire race or for the last portion.

3 Comparisons

Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.

3.1 Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and Asics Gel Hyper Speed

These two shoes are remarkably close, and I recommend them both. The Hyper Speed has an edge in longevity and forefoot cushioning, but it's not a huge deal. Buy either of them and run happy.

Puma Faas 100 R top
Puma Faas 100 R bottom
Puma Faas 100 R inside
Puma Faas 100 R outside
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 top
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 bottom
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 inside
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 outside
helping-hand.jpg
Please support this site

This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.


3.2 Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and New Balance RC5000

Few shoes can compare with the ultralight New Balance RC5000. The RC5000 is a better shoe if you can handle the limited cushioning, but the Faas 100 R is going to work better for most folks.

Puma Faas 100 R top
Puma Faas 100 R bottom
Puma Faas 100 R inside
Puma Faas 100 R outside
New Balance MRC 5000 top
New Balance MRC 5000 bottom
New Balance MRC 5000 inside
New Balance MRC 5000 outside
helping-hand.jpg
Please support this site

This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.


3.3 Puma Faas 100 R‏‎ and Asics GT 2000

I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the Asics GT 2000. The GT 2000 really shows how good the Faas 100 R is, weighing just over half as much while providing almost the same cushioning. The Puma lacks the over engineering and complexity of the GT 2000 and its simplicity is a key benefit.

Puma Faas 100 R top
Puma Faas 100 R bottom
Puma Faas 100 R inside
Puma Faas 100 R outside
Asics GT2000 top
Asics GT2000 bottom
Asics GT2000 inside
Asics GT2000 outside

4 Cushioning and Shoes

It's intuitively obvious that the cushioning in a shoe will reduce the impact on your body when running. However, The Science of Running Shoes indicates that the reality is rather more complex. While slight cushioning may reduce the effort needed to run by improving your Running Economy, most scientific research indicates that more cushioning does further improve Running Economy. In addition, cushioning does not generally reduce impact and may actually increase it. This is counterintuitive, but is likely to be due to the way a runners mind and body adapts to softer cushioning. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence is far from complete and it's hard to give clear recommendations. I believe that some runners will prefer more cushioning, while others prefer less, and typically those running further have a fondness for greater cushioning. I also believe that a shoe should be as light as possible, and a shoe should justify its weight with the cushioning it provides. My advice is to decide what level of cushioning you're looking for, and then find the lightest shoes that also fit well and are comfortable.

5 Visualizing the Attributes of the Puma Faas 100 R

How Puma Faas 100 R compares showing rearfoot cushioning against the performance penalty of its weight. Upper right is better.
How Puma Faas 100 R compares showing forefoot cushioning against the performance penalty of its weight. Upper right is better.
How Puma Faas 100 R compares showing the price against the benefit (cushioning/performance penalty). Upper left is better.
How Puma Faas 100 R compares showing the loaded drop against the benefit (cushioning/performance penalty). Upper left is better.

6 A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes

trophy-winner.jpg

If you're looking for "the best of the best" running shoe, here are my top picks. Of course, the answer will depend a little on what you're looking for, so I have recommendations for various categories.

  • Best All Round Shoe. The Altra Escalante is my current all-round favorite. It has plenty of cushioning for its weight, it has a very springy midsole, it lasts well, and it has a shape that's closer to the shape of a human foot than most shoes. It's a great shoe for any runner, including those Starting to run. It's also a fairly easy shoe to find due to its popularity.
  • Best Maximalist Shoe: If you want something massively cushioned, then I'd recommend the Saucony Kinvara 8. It's remarkably light and remarkably cushioned, beating Hoka at their own game.
  • Best Optimal Shoe: For those looking to trade cushioning for speed, the Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 was my top pick, but the latest version (LT 4) falls short of it's predecessor. There are lots of great optimal running shoes, which provide just enough cushioning with light weight and minimal frills, but all have their weak spots. Probably the best option at the moment is the Altra Vanish-R, which offers great cushioning for just over 5oz/150g.
  • Fastest Shoe: If you really want speed, then check out the Nike Vaporfly 4%. It's light, massively cushioned, and has a carbon fiber plate. Nothing comes close, not even the now defunct New Balance RC5000‏‎ or New Balance RC5000v2‏‎. There are a number of caveats; it's really expensive, it's really hard to find, and there's a significant injury risk.
  • Best Minimalist Shoe: Merrell Trail Glove. I recommend the trail glove for road running in spite of the 'trail' moniker. It's not a fast shoe by any means, but it's comfortable and will last well.
  • All Terrain Shoe. For trail running, I've become a fan of Altra, and I think their best shoe is the the Altra Timp, though the Altra Lone Peak is really close.
  • Honorable Mention: It's not really a running shoe, but the Vivobarefoot Ra is comfortable, minimalist and can more or less pass as a dress shoe. I've worn mine to weddings with a suit and they've not looked out of place. You can run in the Ra, but the leather means it doesn't breathe well.

For a more detailed on running shoes see the Recommendations for Best Running Shoes. This table lists the key attributes of What to Look for in Running Shoes. For more detailed information, on the shoes see detailed shoe comparison.

Full Review

Brand Name Rating Recommended
price 		Benefit Weight
(oz) 		Penalty
(sec/mile) 		Forefoot
Thickness 		Heel
Thickness 		Loaded Drop
mm 		Cushioning Flexibility
Saucony Type A Review Saucony A/A7 Recommended $100 6.4 6.7 12.1 19 22 1 4.3 7
Saucony Type A6 Review Saucony A6 Highly Recommended $100 8.2 6.1 9.5 17 21 4 5.0 7
Saucony Type A8 Review Saucony A8 Highly Recommended $90 7.5 6.2 9.7 19 20 -1 4.7 7
Adidas Adios Boost 2 Review Adidas Adios Worth considering $140 4.7 8.6 13.4 17 27 11 4.0 6
Hoka Bondi 5 Review Hoka Bondi Recommended $150 6.1 11.6 18.1 38 42 5 7.1 2
Hoka Clayton 2 Review Hoka Clayton2 Highly Recommended $150 9.1 8.3 12.9 23 28 1 7.5 5
Hoka Clifton 4 Review Hoka Clifton4 Worth considering $130 7.7 9.3 14.5 30 35 10 7.2 3
ON Cloudflash Review On Cloud Cloudflash Worth considering $180 4.4 8.3 14.6 19 26 7 3.7 6
On Cloudracer Review On Cloud Cloudracer Worth considering $130 5.7 8.2 12.8 19 27 5 4.7 7
ON Cloud X Review On Cloud CloudX Not recommended $140 4.5 8.3 16.3 21 27 7 3.8 7
Mizuno Wave Cruise Review Mizuno Cruise Worth considering $120 6.6 5.9 12.5 17 20 7 3.9 6
Newton Distance IV Review Newton Distance Worth considering $155 7.5 9.1 14.2 26 31 3 6.8 5
Asics Gel DS Racer 10 Review Asics DS Racer Worth considering $110 8.2 7.0 10.9 21 26 6 5.8 5
Altra Duo Review Altra Duo Recommended $130 6.0 8.4 13.1 29 29 1 5.0 5
Mizuno Wave Ekiden 8 Review Mizuno Ekiden Worth considering $115 5.7 5.7 14.6 13 18 6 3.2 8
Saucony Endorphin 2 Review Saucony Endorphin 2 Worth considering $115 8.0 5.1 9.6 15 13 -1 4.1 8
Adidas Energy Boost Review Adidas Energy Worth considering $160 7.2 10.0 15.6 20 30 7 7.2 5
Altra Escalante Review Altra Escalante Best of the Best $130 9.1 8.7 13.5 28 25 -1 7.9 6
Altra Escalante 1.5 Review Altra Escalante 1.5 Best of the Best $130 8.2 9.0 14.0 26 27 -1 7.4 7
Saucony Fastwitch Review Saucony Fastwitch Highly Recommended $90 9.5 7.1 11.1 20 22 4 6.8 7
Topo Fli-Lyte 2 Review Topo Fli-Lyte2 Highly Recommended $100 6.7 9.1 14.2 24 26 3 6.1 5
Reebok Floatride Run Review Reebok Floatride Worth considering $150 7.7 9.6 14.9 28 34 10 7.4 5
Saucony Freedom Review Saucony Freedom Recommended $160 5.4 10.7 16.6 25 29 3 5.8 6
Skechers GORun 4 Review Skechers GORun Not recommended $100 6.1 7.5 11.7 15 23 3 4.5 7
Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 Review Skechers GRU Worth considering $90 7.5 10.0 15.6 28 34 8 7.5 4
Asics GT 2000 Review Asics GT 2000 Not recommended $120 4.8 11.2 17.4 28 35 5 5.4 2
New Balance Hanzo S Review New Balance Hanzo Worth considering $110 7.6 6.9 10.7 21 19 2 5.2 5
Hoka Hupana Review Hoka Hupana Recommended $115 6.1 8.9 13.9 31 36 7 5.4 4
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 Review Asics Hyper Speed Highly Recommended $75 10.9 6.3 9.8 22 26 5 6.8 6
Altra Instinct 4.0 Review Altra Instinct 4.0 Worth considering $120 6.0 9.8 15.3 29 25 -1 5.9 5
Asics Tarther Kainos 3 Review Asics Kainos Worth considering $130 10.0 6.9 10.7 17 27 9 6.8 6
Altra King MT 1.5 Review Altra King MT Recommended $140 7.5 10.7 16.7 19 21 3 8.0 5
Saucony Kinvara 8 Review Saucony Kinvara 8 Best of the Best $110 9.3 8.6 13.4 26 31 3 8.0 5
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Review Altra Lone Peak Highly Recommended $120 4.2 11.4 17.7 24 25 4 4.8 5
Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 Review Nike LT3 Best of the Best $80 9.8 5.4 8.4 16 21 5 5.3 7
Nike Zoom Streak LT 4 Review Nike LT4 Recommended $90 8.5 5.5 8.5 15 21 3 4.6 6
Nike LunarSpider R5 Review Nike LunarSpider Recommended $125 6.9 6.7 10.4 17 21 3 4.6 6
Hoka Mafate Speed Review Hoka Mafate Best of the Best $170 7.6 11.9 18.5 39 40 4 9.0 1
Pearl Izumi EM Road N0 v2 Review Pearl N0 Highly Recommended $100 7.9 6.5 10.1 14 20 4 5.2 8
Saucony Nomad Review Saucony Nomad Worth considering $110 4.3 10.5 17.2 25 27 2 4.5 4
Hoka Odyssey Review Hoka Odyssey Highly Recommended $130 8.5 9.4 14.6 37 45 5 8.0 3
Altra Olympus 2.5 Review Altra Olympus Highly Recommended $150 4.6 11.8 18.4 35 34 0 5.4 6
Altra One 3.0 Review Altra One Recommended $100 6.1 8.8 13.7 23 23 0 5.4 6
Altra Paradigm 4.0 Review Altra Paradigm Highly Recommended $150 5.3 11.0 17.1 28 30 5 5.8 8
Asics Piranha SP 5 Review Asics Piranha Recommended $100 10.1 4.2 6.5 11 15 3 4.2 9
Brooks PureFlow 5 Review Brooks PureFlow Worth considering $110 6.0 9.7 15.1 26 29 5 5.8 8
Salming Race Review Salming Race Worth considering $130 6.9 6.5 10.1 16 19 4 4.5 6
Altra Escalante Racer Review Altra Racer Highly Recommended $140 6.6 7.6 11.8 24 26 6 5.0 8
New Balance RC1600 v2 Review New Balance RC1600 Highly Recommended $110 8.8 5.6 8.7 15 21 5 4.9 8
New Balance RC5000v2 Review New Balance RC5000v2 Best of the Best $125 14.2 4.0 6.2 13 21 6 5.7 7
Skechers GoRun Ride 3 Review Skechers Ride Worth considering $85 5.9 8.5 13.2 18 28 6 5.0 8
Nike RN Distance 2 Review Nike RNDist2 Worth considering $120 8.0 9.2 14.3 25 28 4 7.4 7
Inov-8 RoadXTreme 220 Review Inov-8 RXT-220 Worth considering $120 5.2 8.0 18.2 14 17 3 4.2 8
Salomon Sense Ride Review Salomon Sense Worth considering $120 8.5 10.0 15.6 26 29 6 8.5 0
Altra Solstice Review Altra Solstice Highly Recommended $90 7.1 8.1 12.5 23 25 0 5.7 5
Topo ST-2 Review Topo ST-2 Highly Recommended $90 8.2 7.3 11.4 20 18 0 6.0 7
Hoka Stinson Lite Review Hoka Stinson Highly Recommended $160 7.3 11.6 18.1 35 40 6 8.5 0
Altra Superior Altra Superior Highly Recommended $110 5.6 9.9 15.5 21 25 -1 5.5 4
Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Review Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Highly Recommended $160 7.7 6.6 10.2 17 21 4 5.1 5
Topo Terraventure Topo Terraventure Review Pending $110 2.6 10.8 27.5 24 24 0 2.8 10
Altra Timp Review Altra Timp Best of the Best $130 3.7 11.6 18.1 30 31 -1 4.3 6
Altra Torin 2.0 Review Altra Torin Worth considering $125 3.4 9.6 20.7 30 25 1 3.3 9
Altra Torin 3.5 Review Altra Torin 3.5 Worth considering $125 5.8 9.3 14.5 27 28 0 5.4 8
Hoka Tracer Review Hoka Tracer Recommended $130 7.2 7.4 11.5 21 24 2 5.3 5
Merrell Trail Glove 4 Review Merrell Trail Glove 4 Best of the Best $100 3.4 8.4 23.8 13 13 0 2.8 10
Topo Tribute Review Topo Tribute Recommended $100 5.9 7.3 11.4 20 18 -1 4.3 6
Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review Mizuno Universe Highly Recommended $125 10.7 3.1 10.6 9 12 1 3.3 9
Altra Vanish-R Review Altra Vanish-R Recommended $100 16.1 5.3 8.2 19 21 4 8.5 6
Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Review Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Highly Recommended $85 2.1 6.1 27.6 6 5 0 1.3 10
Nike Vaporfly 4% Review Nike Vaporfly Best of the Best $250 10.4 7.2 11.2 25 37 8 7.5 2
New Balance Vazee Pace Review New Balance Vazee Pace Worth considering $110 6.0 8.6 13.4 18 24 6 5.2 5
Asics TartherZeal 3 Review Asics Zeal Worth considering $140 10.9 6.3 9.8 17 27 9 6.8 6
Saucony Zealot 3 Review Saucony Zealot3 Recommended $130 8.9 9.5 14.8 29 32 4 8.5 6
Nike Zoom Fly Review Nike Zoom Fly Worth considering $150 8.3 8.7 13.5 29 36 8 7.2 3

It's not a running shoe, but I love the Hoka Tor Ultra hiking boot and I've tested the Altra Lone Peak Boot, the Hoka Tor Speed 2, and the Inov-8 Roclite 325 hiking boots
Older shoe reviews: Saucony Hattori Review, Mizuno Cursoris Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, Hoka Clifton Review, Saucony Virrata 2 Review, Brooks PureCadence 3 Review, Brooks PureConnect 3 Review, Brooks PureFlow 3 Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, New Balance 980 Review, Brooks Transcend 2 Review, Hoka Huaka Review, Patagonia EVERlong Review, Asics 33-DFA Review, Hoka Conquest Review, Saucony Cortana Review, Puma Faas 100 R Review, Saucony Fastwitch Review, Nike Free Review, Asics Gel Lyte 33 Review, Skechers GOmeb Speed Review, Skechers GOrun Ultra Road Review, Nike LunaRacer Review, Altra Paradigm Review.

Retrieved from "http://fellrnr.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Puma_Faas_100_R&oldid=8609"