Difference between revisions of "Skechers GOrun Ultra"
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) |
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Skechers GOrun Ultra Review}} | + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 Review}} |
− | Is the | + | Is the GOrun Ultra a Hoka for only $80? Sadly not, but it's closer than you might expect, though the cost per mile probably works out higher than the longer lasting Hokas. With the updated GOrun Ultra 2, Skechers has some good improvements, but there's still some way to go before it's competitive. I've rated the Ultra as "Worth Considering." {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}} |
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
− | * | + | |- valign="top" |
− | * | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-top.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 top]] |
− | * | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 bottom]] |
− | * | + | |- valign="top" |
− | * | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-inside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 inside]] |
− | * | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-outside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 outside]] |
− | + | |} | |
− | + | =Characteristics= | |
− | The GOrun has | + | * {{H:WhyBuy}}. The GOrun Ultra offers a lot of cushioning for the purchase price, but its lack of longevity makes it hard to recommend. |
+ | * {{H:cushioning}}. The GOrun Ultra has plenty of soft cushioning, but it falls short of the [[Hoka Clifton]]. The cushioning lacks bounce, especially when compared with a Hoka. I think part of the problem is the egg crate effect of the midsole that make the GOrun Ultra softer on initial contact, but this softness does not last all the way through the landing. Overall, the GOrun Ultra can't compete with the [[Hoka Clifton]] for the soft, plush ride. | ||
+ | * {{H:drop}}. The drop of the GOrun Ultra is 6mm, but when the shoe is worn this goes up to 8mm, which I believe is far too much. | ||
+ | * {{H:structure}}. The construction of the sole is a little odd, becoming thicker just in front and to the inside of your heel. This creates a sort of medial post, in an attempt to resist the natural roll of your foot as it lands. The combination of the shape of the midsole and the drop caused me slight knee discomfort, something I rarely suffer from. | ||
+ | * {{H:flexibility}}. The GOrun Ultra is quite flexible when compared with a Hoka. This is partly due to the lack of outsole, and partly the egg crate effect that means the midsole is thinner than it would otherwise be. | ||
+ | * {{H:outsole}}. There is no outsole, and the egg crate effect of the exposed midsole means that the GOrun Ultra wears quickly. The exposed egg crate "lugs" wear down horribly quickly on asphalt, even faster than the [[Altra One]]. | ||
+ | * {{H:shape}}. The GORun Ultra has a better shape than most running shoes, and while it's not really designed to fit the human foot, I found I could run in them without cutting open the toe box. {{H:TryCuttingShoes}} | ||
+ | * {{H:upper}}. The upper mostly unpadded, with just a relatively small amount around the ankle opening. There are far more seams and overlays than I'd like, making blisters a possible issue. Most of the upper is inflexible, but the area at the top of the toe box and the lower part of the tongue is quite stretchy. The inflexible areas of the shoe don't have much breathability, and seem overly thick. | ||
+ | * {{H:tongue}}. The tongue is attached on either side, but this does not extend all the way up the tongue, so it doesn't feel like a "sock upper". This arrangement worked really well, keeping the tongue in place without any problems putting the shoe on or creating excessive pressure on the top of the foot. The tongue is moderately padded at the top end. | ||
+ | * {{H:lacing}}. The traditional flat laces stayed tied. | ||
+ | * {{H:heelcounter}}. The heel counter is fairly firm, but also quite small so it shouldn't cause any issues. | ||
+ | [[File:GORunSole.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|A close up of the sole, showing the wear that occurred after just 130 miles. ]] | ||
+ | {{FastBlr|skechers/gorun-ultra-2-707|707|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2}} | ||
+ | =Comparisons= | ||
+ | Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition. | ||
+ | ==Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Sketchers GOrun Ultra== | ||
+ | Skechers have made a number of good improvements over the original version. The thickness of the midsole had changed from 26/40 to 28/34, so the forefoot is thicker and better cushioned, while rearfoot cushioning has been reduced. While it's sad to see the loss of rear cushioning, this has made the drop rather less horrible. The drop is still 8mm when loaded, but at least that's an improvement. The other improvement is in the upper at the extreme rear where it wraps around the heel bone. In the original, the rear did not cup the heel at all, which was an odd sensation and I found it put undue pressure on the Achilles bursa (actually the Retrocalcaneal Bursa). Sadly Skechers did not improve the lifespan of the GOrun Ultra, and it still wears out like it's made of chocolate. For more bad news, the weight has gone up nearly an ounce. | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |- valign="top" | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-top.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 top]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 bottom]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-inside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 inside]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-outside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 outside]] | ||
+ | |- valign="top" | ||
+ | |[[File:Sketchers-GoRun-Ultra-top.jpg|none|thumb|200px|Sketchers GOrun Ultra top]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Sketchers-GoRun-Ultra-bottom.jpg|none|thumb|200px|Sketchers GOrun Ultra bottom]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Sketchers-GoRun-Ultra-inside.jpg|none|thumb|200px|Sketchers GOrun Ultra inside]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Sketchers-GoRun-Ultra-outside.jpg|none|thumb|200px|Sketchers GOrun Ultra outside]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | ==Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Hoka Clifton 2== | ||
+ | The [[Hoka Clifton| Hoka Clifton 2]] is the best [[Maximalist]] shoe by far, combining massive cushioning with light weight. The GOrun Ultra is heavier, but offers less cushioning. The Clifton has far less drop, and lasts vastly longer, as well as being better cushioned. While the GOrun Ultra may be cheaper to buy, the cost per mile is much higher, and the Clifton is a better shoe in every way I can think of. | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |- valign="top" | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-top.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 top]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 bottom]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-inside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 inside]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-outside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 outside]] | ||
+ | |- valign="top" | ||
+ | |[[File:Hoka Clifton 2-top.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Hoka Clifton 2 top]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Hoka Clifton 2-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Hoka Clifton 2 bottom]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Hoka Clifton 2-inside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Hoka Clifton 2 inside]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Hoka Clifton 2-outside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Hoka Clifton 2 outside]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | {{FastBlr|hoka-one-one/clifton-2-1062|1062|Hoka Clifton 2}} | ||
+ | ==Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Saucony Kinvara== | ||
+ | The [[Saucony Kinvara]] is a great transitional shoe from a traditional shoe like the [[Asics GT 2000]] to something more optimal. The Kinvara is quite a bit lighter (>2oz) and has less drop, but not as well cushioned. The Kinvara is a much better transitional shoe, and the Ultra is more of a compromised [[Maximalist]]. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
− | |[[File: | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-top.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 top]] |
− | |[[File: | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 bottom]] |
− | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-inside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 inside]] | |
− | |[[File: | + | |[[File:Skechers GoRun Ultra 2-outside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 outside]] |
− | |[[File: | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
− | |[[File: | + | |[[File:Saucony Kinvara 6-top.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Saucony Kinvara 6 top]] |
+ | |[[File:Saucony Kinvara 6-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Saucony Kinvara 6 bottom]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Saucony Kinvara 6-inside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Saucony Kinvara 6 inside]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Saucony Kinvara 6-outside.JPG|none|thumb|200px|Saucony Kinvara 6 outside]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | {{ | + | {{FastBlr|saucony/kinvara-6-952|952|Saucony Kinvara 6}} |
{{ShoeGraphs}} | {{ShoeGraphs}} | ||
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes= | =A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes= | ||
{{:Shoes-include}} | {{:Shoes-include}} |
Latest revision as of 19:42, 19 July 2016
Is the GOrun Ultra a Hoka for only $80? Sadly not, but it's closer than you might expect, though the cost per mile probably works out higher than the longer lasting Hokas. With the updated GOrun Ultra 2, Skechers has some good improvements, but there's still some way to go before it's competitive. I've rated the Ultra as "Worth Considering." (I use The Science of Running Shoes as the basis of how I test running shoes and what you should look for in a running shoe.)
Contents
1 Characteristics
- Why you’d buy it. The GOrun Ultra offers a lot of cushioning for the purchase price, but its lack of longevity makes it hard to recommend.
- Cushioning . The GOrun Ultra has plenty of soft cushioning, but it falls short of the Hoka Clifton. The cushioning lacks bounce, especially when compared with a Hoka. I think part of the problem is the egg crate effect of the midsole that make the GOrun Ultra softer on initial contact, but this softness does not last all the way through the landing. Overall, the GOrun Ultra can't compete with the Hoka Clifton for the soft, plush ride.
- Drop. The drop of the GOrun Ultra is 6mm, but when the shoe is worn this goes up to 8mm, which I believe is far too much.
- Structure. The construction of the sole is a little odd, becoming thicker just in front and to the inside of your heel. This creates a sort of medial post, in an attempt to resist the natural roll of your foot as it lands. The combination of the shape of the midsole and the drop caused me slight knee discomfort, something I rarely suffer from.
- Flexibility. The GOrun Ultra is quite flexible when compared with a Hoka. This is partly due to the lack of outsole, and partly the egg crate effect that means the midsole is thinner than it would otherwise be.
- Outsole. There is no outsole, and the egg crate effect of the exposed midsole means that the GOrun Ultra wears quickly. The exposed egg crate "lugs" wear down horribly quickly on asphalt, even faster than the Altra One.
- Shape. The GORun Ultra has a better shape than most running shoes, and while it's not really designed to fit the human foot, I found I could run in them without cutting open the toe box. (I recommend cutting open the toe box of virtually all running shoes, with the exception of a few shoes like some Altra shoes. When you have some worn out shoes, you should try cutting open the toe box. I've found that it's a big improvement, allowing my toes to move naturally and engage for toe off, as well as reducing the possibility of blisters.)
- Upper. The upper mostly unpadded, with just a relatively small amount around the ankle opening. There are far more seams and overlays than I'd like, making blisters a possible issue. Most of the upper is inflexible, but the area at the top of the toe box and the lower part of the tongue is quite stretchy. The inflexible areas of the shoe don't have much breathability, and seem overly thick.
- Tongue. The tongue is attached on either side, but this does not extend all the way up the tongue, so it doesn't feel like a "sock upper". This arrangement worked really well, keeping the tongue in place without any problems putting the shoe on or creating excessive pressure on the top of the foot. The tongue is moderately padded at the top end.
- Lacing. The traditional flat laces stayed tied.
- Heel Counter. The heel counter is fairly firm, but also quite small so it shouldn't cause any issues.
This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.
|
2 Comparisons
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.
2.1 Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Sketchers GOrun Ultra
Skechers have made a number of good improvements over the original version. The thickness of the midsole had changed from 26/40 to 28/34, so the forefoot is thicker and better cushioned, while rearfoot cushioning has been reduced. While it's sad to see the loss of rear cushioning, this has made the drop rather less horrible. The drop is still 8mm when loaded, but at least that's an improvement. The other improvement is in the upper at the extreme rear where it wraps around the heel bone. In the original, the rear did not cup the heel at all, which was an odd sensation and I found it put undue pressure on the Achilles bursa (actually the Retrocalcaneal Bursa). Sadly Skechers did not improve the lifespan of the GOrun Ultra, and it still wears out like it's made of chocolate. For more bad news, the weight has gone up nearly an ounce.
2.2 Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Hoka Clifton 2
The Hoka Clifton 2 is the best Maximalist shoe by far, combining massive cushioning with light weight. The GOrun Ultra is heavier, but offers less cushioning. The Clifton has far less drop, and lasts vastly longer, as well as being better cushioned. While the GOrun Ultra may be cheaper to buy, the cost per mile is much higher, and the Clifton is a better shoe in every way I can think of.
This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.
|
2.3 Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 and Saucony Kinvara
The Saucony Kinvara is a great transitional shoe from a traditional shoe like the Asics GT 2000 to something more optimal. The Kinvara is quite a bit lighter (>2oz) and has less drop, but not as well cushioned. The Kinvara is a much better transitional shoe, and the Ultra is more of a compromised Maximalist.
This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.
|
3 Cushioning and Shoes
It's intuitively obvious that the cushioning in a shoe will reduce the impact on your body when running. However, The Science of Running Shoes indicates that the reality is rather more complex. While slight cushioning may reduce the effort needed to run by improving your Running Economy, most scientific research indicates that more cushioning does further improve Running Economy. In addition, cushioning does not generally reduce impact and may actually increase it. This is counterintuitive, but is likely to be due to the way a runners mind and body adapts to softer cushioning. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence is far from complete and it's hard to give clear recommendations. I believe that some runners will prefer more cushioning, while others prefer less, and typically those running further have a fondness for greater cushioning. I also believe that a shoe should be as light as possible, and a shoe should justify its weight with the cushioning it provides. My advice is to decide what level of cushioning you're looking for, and then find the lightest shoes that also fit well and are comfortable.
4 Visualizing the Attributes of the Skechers GOrun Ultra
5 A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes
If you're looking for "the best of the best" running shoe, here are my top picks. Of course, the answer will depend a little on what you're looking for, so I have recommendations for various categories.
|
For a more detailed on running shoes see the Recommendations for Best Running Shoes. This table lists the key attributes of What to Look for in Running Shoes. For more detailed information, on the shoes see detailed shoe comparison.
Full Review |
Brand | Name | Rating | Recommended price |
Benefit | Weight (oz) |
Penalty (sec/mile) |
Forefoot Thickness |
Heel Thickness |
Loaded Drop mm |
Cushioning | Flexibility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saucony Type A Review | Saucony | A/A7 | Recommended | $100 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 12.1 | 19 | 22 | 1 | 4.3 | 7 |
Saucony Type A6 Review | Saucony | A6 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 8.2 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 17 | 21 | 4 | 5.0 | 7 |
Saucony Type A8 Review | Saucony | A8 | Highly Recommended | $90 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 9.7 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 4.7 | 7 |
Adidas Adios Boost 2 Review | Adidas | Adios | Worth considering | $140 | 4.7 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 17 | 27 | 11 | 4.0 | 6 |
Hoka Bondi 5 Review | Hoka | Bondi | Recommended | $150 | 6.1 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 38 | 42 | 5 | 7.1 | 2 |
Hoka Clayton 2 Review | Hoka | Clayton2 | Highly Recommended | $150 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 12.9 | 23 | 28 | 1 | 7.5 | 5 |
Hoka Clifton 4 Review | Hoka | Clifton4 | Worth considering | $130 | 7.7 | 9.3 | 14.5 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 7.2 | 3 |
ON Cloudflash Review | On Cloud | Cloudflash | Worth considering | $180 | 4.4 | 8.3 | 14.6 | 19 | 26 | 7 | 3.7 | 6 |
On Cloudracer Review | On Cloud | Cloudracer | Worth considering | $130 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 12.8 | 19 | 27 | 5 | 4.7 | 7 |
ON Cloud X Review | On Cloud | CloudX | Not recommended | $140 | 4.5 | 8.3 | 16.3 | 21 | 27 | 7 | 3.8 | 7 |
Mizuno Wave Cruise Review | Mizuno | Cruise | Worth considering | $120 | 6.6 | 5.9 | 12.5 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 3.9 | 6 |
Newton Distance IV Review | Newton | Distance | Worth considering | $155 | 7.5 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 6.8 | 5 |
Asics Gel DS Racer 10 Review | Asics | DS Racer | Worth considering | $110 | 8.2 | 7.0 | 10.9 | 21 | 26 | 6 | 5.8 | 5 |
Altra Duo Review | Altra | Duo | Recommended | $130 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 13.1 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 5.0 | 5 |
Mizuno Wave Ekiden 8 Review | Mizuno | Ekiden | Worth considering | $115 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 14.6 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 3.2 | 8 |
Saucony Endorphin 2 Review | Saucony | Endorphin 2 | Worth considering | $115 | 8.0 | 5.1 | 9.6 | 15 | 13 | -1 | 4.1 | 8 |
Adidas Energy Boost Review | Adidas | Energy | Worth considering | $160 | 7.2 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 20 | 30 | 7 | 7.2 | 5 |
Altra Escalante Review | Altra | Escalante | Best of the Best | $130 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 28 | 25 | -1 | 7.9 | 6 |
Altra Escalante 1.5 Review | Altra | Escalante 1.5 | Best of the Best | $130 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 26 | 27 | -1 | 7.4 | 7 |
Saucony Fastwitch Review | Saucony | Fastwitch | Highly Recommended | $90 | 9.5 | 7.1 | 11.1 | 20 | 22 | 4 | 6.8 | 7 |
Topo Fli-Lyte 2 Review | Topo | Fli-Lyte2 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 6.7 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 24 | 26 | 3 | 6.1 | 5 |
Reebok Floatride Run Review | Reebok | Floatride | Worth considering | $150 | 7.7 | 9.6 | 14.9 | 28 | 34 | 10 | 7.4 | 5 |
Saucony Freedom Review | Saucony | Freedom | Recommended | $160 | 5.4 | 10.7 | 16.6 | 25 | 29 | 3 | 5.8 | 6 |
Skechers GORun 4 Review | Skechers | GORun | Not recommended | $100 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 11.7 | 15 | 23 | 3 | 4.5 | 7 |
Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 Review | Skechers | GRU | Worth considering | $90 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 28 | 34 | 8 | 7.5 | 4 |
Asics GT 2000 Review | Asics | GT 2000 | Not recommended | $120 | 4.8 | 11.2 | 17.4 | 28 | 35 | 5 | 5.4 | 2 |
New Balance Hanzo S Review | New Balance | Hanzo | Worth considering | $110 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 10.7 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 5.2 | 5 |
Hoka Hupana Review | Hoka | Hupana | Recommended | $115 | 6.1 | 8.9 | 13.9 | 31 | 36 | 7 | 5.4 | 4 |
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 Review | Asics | Hyper Speed | Highly Recommended | $75 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 22 | 26 | 5 | 6.8 | 6 |
Altra Instinct 4.0 Review | Altra | Instinct 4.0 | Worth considering | $120 | 6.0 | 9.8 | 15.3 | 29 | 25 | -1 | 5.9 | 5 |
Asics Tarther Kainos 3 Review | Asics | Kainos | Worth considering | $130 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 10.7 | 17 | 27 | 9 | 6.8 | 6 |
Altra King MT 1.5 Review | Altra | King MT | Recommended | $140 | 7.5 | 10.7 | 16.7 | 19 | 21 | 3 | 8.0 | 5 |
Saucony Kinvara 8 Review | Saucony | Kinvara 8 | Best of the Best | $110 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 8.0 | 5 |
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Review | Altra | Lone Peak | Highly Recommended | $120 | 4.2 | 11.4 | 17.7 | 24 | 25 | 4 | 4.8 | 5 |
Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 Review | Nike | LT3 | Best of the Best | $80 | 9.8 | 5.4 | 8.4 | 16 | 21 | 5 | 5.3 | 7 |
Nike Zoom Streak LT 4 Review | Nike | LT4 | Recommended | $90 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 4.6 | 6 |
Nike LunarSpider R5 Review | Nike | LunarSpider | Recommended | $125 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 10.4 | 17 | 21 | 3 | 4.6 | 6 |
Hoka Mafate Speed Review | Hoka | Mafate | Best of the Best | $170 | 7.6 | 11.9 | 18.5 | 39 | 40 | 4 | 9.0 | 1 |
Pearl Izumi EM Road N0 v2 Review | Pearl | N0 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 14 | 20 | 4 | 5.2 | 8 |
Saucony Nomad Review | Saucony | Nomad | Worth considering | $110 | 4.3 | 10.5 | 17.2 | 25 | 27 | 2 | 4.5 | 4 |
Hoka Odyssey Review | Hoka | Odyssey | Highly Recommended | $130 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 14.6 | 37 | 45 | 5 | 8.0 | 3 |
Altra Olympus 2.5 Review | Altra | Olympus | Highly Recommended | $150 | 4.6 | 11.8 | 18.4 | 35 | 34 | 0 | 5.4 | 6 |
Altra One 3.0 Review | Altra | One | Recommended | $100 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 13.7 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 5.4 | 6 |
Altra Paradigm 4.0 Review | Altra | Paradigm | Highly Recommended | $150 | 5.3 | 11.0 | 17.1 | 28 | 30 | 5 | 5.8 | 8 |
Asics Piranha SP 5 Review | Asics | Piranha | Recommended | $100 | 10.1 | 4.2 | 6.5 | 11 | 15 | 3 | 4.2 | 9 |
Brooks PureFlow 5 Review | Brooks | PureFlow | Worth considering | $110 | 6.0 | 9.7 | 15.1 | 26 | 29 | 5 | 5.8 | 8 |
Salming Race Review | Salming | Race | Worth considering | $130 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 16 | 19 | 4 | 4.5 | 6 |
Altra Escalante Racer Review | Altra | Racer | Highly Recommended | $140 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 11.8 | 24 | 26 | 6 | 5.0 | 8 |
New Balance RC1600 v2 Review | New Balance | RC1600 | Highly Recommended | $110 | 8.8 | 5.6 | 8.7 | 15 | 21 | 5 | 4.9 | 8 |
New Balance RC5000v2 Review | New Balance | RC5000v2 | Best of the Best | $125 | 14.2 | 4.0 | 6.2 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 5.7 | 7 |
Skechers GoRun Ride 3 Review | Skechers | Ride | Worth considering | $85 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 13.2 | 18 | 28 | 6 | 5.0 | 8 |
Nike RN Distance 2 Review | Nike | RNDist2 | Worth considering | $120 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 14.3 | 25 | 28 | 4 | 7.4 | 7 |
Inov-8 RoadXTreme 220 Review | Inov-8 | RXT-220 | Worth considering | $120 | 5.2 | 8.0 | 18.2 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 4.2 | 8 |
Salomon Sense Ride Review | Salomon | Sense | Worth considering | $120 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 26 | 29 | 6 | 8.5 | 0 |
Altra Solstice Review | Altra | Solstice | Highly Recommended | $90 | 7.1 | 8.1 | 12.5 | 23 | 25 | 0 | 5.7 | 5 |
Topo ST-2 Review | Topo | ST-2 | Highly Recommended | $90 | 8.2 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 6.0 | 7 |
Hoka Stinson Lite Review | Hoka | Stinson | Highly Recommended | $160 | 7.3 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 35 | 40 | 6 | 8.5 | 0 |
Altra Superior | Altra | Superior | Highly Recommended | $110 | 5.6 | 9.9 | 15.5 | 21 | 25 | -1 | 5.5 | 4 |
Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Review | Adidas | Takumi Sen 3 | Highly Recommended | $160 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 10.2 | 17 | 21 | 4 | 5.1 | 5 |
Topo Terraventure | Topo | Terraventure | Review Pending | $110 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 27.5 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 2.8 | 10 |
Altra Timp Review | Altra | Timp | Best of the Best | $130 | 3.7 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 30 | 31 | -1 | 4.3 | 6 |
Altra Torin 2.0 Review | Altra | Torin | Worth considering | $125 | 3.4 | 9.6 | 20.7 | 30 | 25 | 1 | 3.3 | 9 |
Altra Torin 3.5 Review | Altra | Torin 3.5 | Worth considering | $125 | 5.8 | 9.3 | 14.5 | 27 | 28 | 0 | 5.4 | 8 |
Hoka Tracer Review | Hoka | Tracer | Recommended | $130 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 11.5 | 21 | 24 | 2 | 5.3 | 5 |
Merrell Trail Glove 4 Review | Merrell | Trail Glove 4 | Best of the Best | $100 | 3.4 | 8.4 | 23.8 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 2.8 | 10 |
Topo Tribute Review | Topo | Tribute | Recommended | $100 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 20 | 18 | -1 | 4.3 | 6 |
Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review | Mizuno | Universe | Highly Recommended | $125 | 10.7 | 3.1 | 10.6 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 3.3 | 9 |
Altra Vanish-R Review | Altra | Vanish-R | Recommended | $100 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 8.2 | 19 | 21 | 4 | 8.5 | 6 |
Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Review | Merrell | Vapor Glove 3 | Highly Recommended | $85 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 27.6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1.3 | 10 |
Nike Vaporfly 4% Review | Nike | Vaporfly | Best of the Best | $250 | 10.4 | 7.2 | 11.2 | 25 | 37 | 8 | 7.5 | 2 |
New Balance Vazee Pace Review | New Balance | Vazee Pace | Worth considering | $110 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 18 | 24 | 6 | 5.2 | 5 |
Asics TartherZeal 3 Review | Asics | Zeal | Worth considering | $140 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 17 | 27 | 9 | 6.8 | 6 |
Saucony Zealot 3 Review | Saucony | Zealot3 | Recommended | $130 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 14.8 | 29 | 32 | 4 | 8.5 | 6 |
Nike Zoom Fly Review | Nike | Zoom Fly | Worth considering | $150 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 29 | 36 | 8 | 7.2 | 3 |
It's not a running shoe, but I love the Hoka Tor Ultra hiking boot and I've tested the Altra Lone Peak Boot, the Hoka Tor Speed 2, and the Inov-8 Roclite 325 hiking boots
Older shoe reviews: Saucony Hattori Review, Mizuno Cursoris Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, Hoka Clifton Review, Saucony Virrata 2 Review, Brooks PureCadence 3 Review, Brooks PureConnect 3 Review, Brooks PureFlow 3 Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, New Balance 980 Review, Brooks Transcend 2 Review, Hoka Huaka Review, Patagonia EVERlong Review, Asics 33-DFA Review, Hoka Conquest Review, Saucony Cortana Review, Puma Faas 100 R Review, Saucony Fastwitch Review, Nike Free Review, Asics Gel Lyte 33 Review, Skechers GOmeb Speed Review, Skechers GOrun Ultra Road Review, Nike LunaRacer Review, Altra Paradigm Review.