Difference between revisions of "Brooks PureCadence"

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
(Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Brooks PureCadence 3 Review}} The [http://www.zappos.com/brooks-purecadence Brooks PureCadence] 3 is an acceptable, though not great, shoe. It has good longevit...")
 
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Brooks PureCadence 3 Review}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Brooks PureCadence 3 Review}}
−
The [http://www.zappos.com/brooks-purecadence Brooks PureCadence] 3 is an acceptable, though not great, shoe. It has good longevity due to the extensive hard rubber outsole and firm foam, but these features also mean that it's rather heavy for the cushioning it provides. The PureCadence has 4mm of drop and some anti-[[Pronation]], but neither caused me any problems.  
+
The PureCadence is part way between a true minimalist shoe and the massively cushioned [[Minimax]] shoes. I found the PureConnect to have less cushioning than I expected given its weight. Of the three shoes I've tested in the Brook's Pure range, I think the PureCadence is the weakest. It has firmer foam on the inside of the heel (a medial post) that is intended to reduce pronation, but science has shown this to be ineffective. These "stability" features simply makes the shoe firmer than it needs to be, though this firmness breaks down fairly quickly. {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}}
 
{| class="wikitable"  
 
{| class="wikitable"  
 
|- valign="top"
 
|- valign="top"
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|}
 
|}
 
=Characteristics=
 
=Characteristics=
−
* {{H:WhyBuy}}. The PureCadence would make a good shoe for someone looking to transition from a more traditional shoe, though I'd suggest the [[Saucony Kinvara]] instead, as it's lighter and more softly cushioned. If you're not looking for a transition shoe, then the [[Hoka Clifton]] is lighter and much better cushioned, or the [[Altra One2| Altra One<sup>2</sup>]] lot lighter and more softly cushioned.
+
* {{H:WhyBuy}}. The PureCadence might make a good shoe for someone looking to transition from a more traditional shoe, though the PureFlow is a better choice from the Brook's Pure range. The [[Saucony Kinvara]] is a better transitional shoe than either the PureCadence or PureFlow, as it's lighter and more softly cushioned. If you're not looking for a transition shoe, then the [[Hoka Clifton]] is lighter and much better cushioned, or the [[Altra One2| Altra One<sup>2</sup>]] lot lighter and more softly cushioned.
−
* {{H:cushioning}}.  The PureCadence is nicely cushioned, but a little on the firm side, especially given its weight.  
+
* {{H:cushioning}}.  The PureCadence is reasonably cushioned, but the medial post makes the rear of the shoe far too firm out of the box. I was surprise how rapidly the midsole became softer; I don't expect foam to break down quite as quickly as that. Overall the PureCadence is a little on the firm side and I'd like to see more cushioning for this weight.  
−
* {{H:drop}}. The PureCadence has 4mm of drop, which did not impact my foot strike unduly. Swapping between the PureCadence and a zero drop shoe highlights the difference that 4 mm makes, and it does create tend to move the foot strike towards the heel, but I was able to adjust.  
+
* {{H:drop}}. The PureCadence has 5mm of drop when unloaded, but this drops quite a bit when you're wearing the shoe.  
−
* {{H:structure}}. This shoe uses multiple densities of foam, with firmer foam on the inside (medial) of the heel. (This is intended to reduce [[Pronation]], but these features don't actually reduce pronation significantly and are likely to cause problems.) This is quite mild and I didn't find it interfered with my biomechanics at all. There are some moderate grooves to improve flexibility. The area under the arch is slightly raised, which could put pressure on the arch and cause problems. (Arches are strong structures when loaded from above, but can be broken easily by pressure from below.)  
+
* {{H:structure}}. The PureCadence uses multiple densities of foam, with firmer foam on the inside of the heel (medial post). This is intended to reduce [[Pronation]], but these features don't actually reduce pronation significantly and are likely to cause problems. This is quite mild and once the foam had broken down, and I didn't find it interfered with my biomechanics at all. The midsole has some moderate grooves to improve flexibility. The area under the arch is slightly raised, which could put pressure on the arch and cause problems. (Arches are strong structures when loaded from above, but can be broken easily by pressure from below.) The Pure range of shoes includes a "Toe Flex" which is a thinning of the midsole at the front that Brooks claim "allows the big toe to function independently", though I couldn't nice any effect. The heels of the Pure shoes are more rounded than most traditional shoes, which is a good thing if you're a rear foot striker.
−
* {{H:flexibility}}. The PureCadence is nicely flexible due to the midsole groves and the gaps in the outsole.
+
* {{H:flexibility}}. The PureCadence is nicely flexible due to the midsole groves and the gaps in the outsole.  
−
* {{H:outsole}}. The hard rubber outsole overs the contact areas of the shoe, which improves longevity and grip, but adds to the weight. As you can see from the pictures, the outsole is in patches. This helps keep the shoe flexible, as the harder rubber of an outsole is quite inflexible, so a continuous layer is not only heavier, but less flexible as well. The outsole rubber used is a nice combination of hard wearing and grippy, and is fairly thick. Of course this is also the Achilles' heel of the shoe, as the outsole is probably the reason the shoe is quite heavy when compared with the [[Hoka Clifton]], or [[Saucony Virrata]].
+
* {{H:outsole}}. The hard rubber outsole covers the contact areas of the shoe, which improves longevity and grip, but adds to the weight. As you can see from the pictures, the outsole is in patches, which helps keep the shoe lighter and more flexible. This is because the harder rubber of an outsole is quite inflexible, so a continuous layer is not only heavier, but less flexible as well. The outsole rubber used here is a nice combination of hard wearing and grippy, and is fairly thick. Of course this is also the Achilles' heel of the shoe, as the outsole is probably part of the reason the shoe is quite heavy when compared with the [[Hoka Clifton]], or [[Saucony Virrata]].
 
* {{H:shape}}. The shoe of the shoe is closer to the human foot than many designs, but it's not quite right. It's like someone described the shape of a human foot to the designers, but they couldn't picture it. I'd recommend [[Shoe Dissection| cutting open the toe box for comfort]].
 
* {{H:shape}}. The shoe of the shoe is closer to the human foot than many designs, but it's not quite right. It's like someone described the shape of a human foot to the designers, but they couldn't picture it. I'd recommend [[Shoe Dissection| cutting open the toe box for comfort]].
−
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible and overly complex, with quite a number of seams. The seams did not cause me any problems, but I think they could be an issue for some runners. The ankle opening is well padded, but the rest is thin and breathes reasonably well. The PureCadence has Brooks' "Nav Band" which is an elasticated band over the middle of the shoe, going from where the upper meets the arch of the foot, over the top and down to the outside edge of the midsole. This elasticated band is intended to keep the shoe secure, but it just puts extra pressure on the top of the foot. I didn't like this band at all, but it's easy to cut it open where it crosses the tongue. Overall the shoe is slightly less comfortable than average.
+
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible and a little more complex than I'd like, with a few seams. The seams did not cause me any problems, but I think they could be an issue for some runners. The ankle opening is well padded, but the rest is thin and breathes reasonably well. The PureCadence has Brooks' "Nav Band" which is an elasticated band over the middle of the shoe, going from where the upper meets the arch of the foot, over the top and down to the outside edge of the midsole. This elasticated band is intended to keep the shoe secure, but it just puts extra pressure on the top of the foot. I didn't like this band at all, but it's easy to cut it open where it crosses the tongue. Overall the shoe is slightly less comfortable than average.
−
* {{H:tongue}}. The PureCadence has a tongue that is attached to the inside of the upper, with the outside free, a combination that I like. It keeps the tongue in place without the problems of a sock style upper. The tongue has a slight degree of soft padding which should be enough for most runners.
+
* {{H:tongue}}. The PureCadence has a tongue that is attached to the inside of the upper, with the outside free, a combination that I like. This is sometimes called a "burrito-wrapper tongue". It keeps the tongue in place without the problems of a sock style upper. The tongue has a slight degree of soft padding which should be enough for most runners.
 
* {{H:lacing}}. The laces are bumpy, which helps them stay tied, but also makes it trickier to get the tension right when tying the shoe. The laces also have an asymmetric pattern, which I didn't find made any difference when compared with other shoes.  
 
* {{H:lacing}}. The laces are bumpy, which helps them stay tied, but also makes it trickier to get the tension right when tying the shoe. The laces also have an asymmetric pattern, which I didn't find made any difference when compared with other shoes.  
 
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The heel counter is quite solid, with hard edges that might cause some people problems.  
 
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The heel counter is quite solid, with hard edges that might cause some people problems.  
−
&nbsp;
+
{{BuyShoes|RW=T|RRS=T|AZ=T}}
−
{{BuyNow|url=http://www.zappos.com/brooks-purecadence|product=Brooks PureCadence|store=Zappos.com}}
 
−
&nbsp;
 
 
=Comparisons=
 
=Comparisons=
 
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.
 
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.
 +
==PureCadence, PureConnect, & PureFlow==
 +
The Brooks Pure range of shoes is intended to be more minimalist, but they're only minimal when compared to a traditional shoe like the Asics GT 2000. I would consider Pure shoes as in the "balanced" category that is part way between minimalist and the massively cushioned Minimax style of shoes. The Pure range all have some over engineering, with pointless features such as the "Nav Band" that puts extra pressure on the top of the foot. It seems that most shoe manufacturers feel the need to justify their prices with some type of gimmick rather than producing simple, effective shoes, which is a shame. To evaluate the three shoes, it's best to look at how they compare to the PureFlow, which is the middle ground.
 +
* '''[[Brooks PureFlow| PureFlow]] and [[Brooks PureCadence| PureCadence]]'''. The PureCadence has a slightly thicker midsole than the PureFlow, but it's also a little firmer. The PureCadence also adds a Medial Post which makes the shoe a little firmer, but this breaks down remarkably quickly.
 +
* '''[[Brooks PureFlow| PureFlow]] and [[Brooks PureConnect| PureConnect]]'''.  The PureConnect has a little less cushioning than the PureFlow, though they are remarkably similar, even when wearing one on each foot. I did notice that the gaps in the midsole of the PureFlow do create a slightly uneven, "lumpy" feel underfoot.
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|- valign="top"
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureCadence-3-top.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureCadence 3 top]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureCadence-3-bottom.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureCadence-3-inside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureCadence 3 inside]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureCadence-3-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureCadence 3 outside]]
 +
|- valign="top"
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureConnect-3-top.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureConnect 3 top]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureConnect-3-bottom.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureConnect 3 bottom]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureConnect-3-inside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureConnect 3 inside]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-PureConnect-3-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks PureConnect 3 outside]]
 +
|- valign="top"
 +
|[[File:Brooks-Pure-Flow-3-top.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks Pure Flow 3 top]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-Pure-Flow-3-bottom.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks Pure Flow 3 bottom]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-Pure-Flow-3-inside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks Pure Flow 3 inside]]
 +
|[[File:Brooks-Pure-Flow-3-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Brooks Pure Flow 3 outside]]
 +
|- valign="top"
 +
|}
 
==PureCadence and Hoka Clifton==
 
==PureCadence and Hoka Clifton==
 
Comparing the PureCadence and the [[Hoka Clifton]], the Clifton wins out due to its lightness and cushioning.
 
Comparing the PureCadence and the [[Hoka Clifton]], the Clifton wins out due to its lightness and cushioning.
 
* Similarities
 
* Similarities
 
** {{H:shape}}. Neither has a good toe box.
 
** {{H:shape}}. Neither has a good toe box.
−
** {{H:drop}}. Both are around 4mm drop though the softer cushioning of the Clifton makes the drop far less noticeable.  
+
** {{H:drop}}. Neither is zero-drop, though the softer cushioning of the Clifton makes the drop far less noticeable.
 +
** {{H:longevity}}.  The extra outsole on the PureCadence improves longevity, but it's foam breaks down more quickly.  
 
* Advantage PureCadence
 
* Advantage PureCadence
 
** {{H:flexibility}}. The PureCadence is a bit more flexible.
 
** {{H:flexibility}}. The PureCadence is a bit more flexible.
Line 35: Line 56:
 
** {{H:price}}. The PureCadence is cheaper.
 
** {{H:price}}. The PureCadence is cheaper.
 
** {{H:availability}}. The PureCadence is widely stocked.
 
** {{H:availability}}. The PureCadence is widely stocked.
−
** {{H:longevity}}.  The extra outsole on the PureCadence improves longevity.
 
 
* Advantage Hoka Clifton
 
* Advantage Hoka Clifton
 
** {{H:cushioning}}. The Clifton has far thicker, softer cushioning.
 
** {{H:cushioning}}. The Clifton has far thicker, softer cushioning.

Revision as of 06:34, 30 December 2014

The PureCadence is part way between a true minimalist shoe and the massively cushioned Minimax shoes. I found the PureConnect to have less cushioning than I expected given its weight. Of the three shoes I've tested in the Brook's Pure range, I think the PureCadence is the weakest. It has firmer foam on the inside of the heel (a medial post) that is intended to reduce pronation, but science has shown this to be ineffective. These "stability" features simply makes the shoe firmer than it needs to be, though this firmness breaks down fairly quickly. (I use The Science of Running Shoes as the basis of how I test running shoes and what you should look for in a running shoe.)

Brooks PureCadence 3 top
Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom
Brooks PureCadence 3 inside
Brooks PureCadence 3 outside

1 Characteristics

  • Why you’d buy it. The PureCadence might make a good shoe for someone looking to transition from a more traditional shoe, though the PureFlow is a better choice from the Brook's Pure range. The Saucony Kinvara is a better transitional shoe than either the PureCadence or PureFlow, as it's lighter and more softly cushioned. If you're not looking for a transition shoe, then the Hoka Clifton is lighter and much better cushioned, or the Altra One2 lot lighter and more softly cushioned.
  • Cushioning . The PureCadence is reasonably cushioned, but the medial post makes the rear of the shoe far too firm out of the box. I was surprise how rapidly the midsole became softer; I don't expect foam to break down quite as quickly as that. Overall the PureCadence is a little on the firm side and I'd like to see more cushioning for this weight.
  • Drop. The PureCadence has 5mm of drop when unloaded, but this drops quite a bit when you're wearing the shoe.
  • Structure. The PureCadence uses multiple densities of foam, with firmer foam on the inside of the heel (medial post). This is intended to reduce Pronation, but these features don't actually reduce pronation significantly and are likely to cause problems. This is quite mild and once the foam had broken down, and I didn't find it interfered with my biomechanics at all. The midsole has some moderate grooves to improve flexibility. The area under the arch is slightly raised, which could put pressure on the arch and cause problems. (Arches are strong structures when loaded from above, but can be broken easily by pressure from below.) The Pure range of shoes includes a "Toe Flex" which is a thinning of the midsole at the front that Brooks claim "allows the big toe to function independently", though I couldn't nice any effect. The heels of the Pure shoes are more rounded than most traditional shoes, which is a good thing if you're a rear foot striker.
  • Flexibility. The PureCadence is nicely flexible due to the midsole groves and the gaps in the outsole.
  • Outsole. The hard rubber outsole covers the contact areas of the shoe, which improves longevity and grip, but adds to the weight. As you can see from the pictures, the outsole is in patches, which helps keep the shoe lighter and more flexible. This is because the harder rubber of an outsole is quite inflexible, so a continuous layer is not only heavier, but less flexible as well. The outsole rubber used here is a nice combination of hard wearing and grippy, and is fairly thick. Of course this is also the Achilles' heel of the shoe, as the outsole is probably part of the reason the shoe is quite heavy when compared with the Hoka Clifton, or Saucony Virrata.
  • Shape. The shoe of the shoe is closer to the human foot than many designs, but it's not quite right. It's like someone described the shape of a human foot to the designers, but they couldn't picture it. I'd recommend cutting open the toe box for comfort.
  • Upper. The upper is inflexible and a little more complex than I'd like, with a few seams. The seams did not cause me any problems, but I think they could be an issue for some runners. The ankle opening is well padded, but the rest is thin and breathes reasonably well. The PureCadence has Brooks' "Nav Band" which is an elasticated band over the middle of the shoe, going from where the upper meets the arch of the foot, over the top and down to the outside edge of the midsole. This elasticated band is intended to keep the shoe secure, but it just puts extra pressure on the top of the foot. I didn't like this band at all, but it's easy to cut it open where it crosses the tongue. Overall the shoe is slightly less comfortable than average.
  • Tongue. The PureCadence has a tongue that is attached to the inside of the upper, with the outside free, a combination that I like. This is sometimes called a "burrito-wrapper tongue". It keeps the tongue in place without the problems of a sock style upper. The tongue has a slight degree of soft padding which should be enough for most runners.
  • Lacing. The laces are bumpy, which helps them stay tied, but also makes it trickier to get the tension right when tying the shoe. The laces also have an asymmetric pattern, which I didn't find made any difference when compared with other shoes.
  • Heel Counter. The heel counter is quite solid, with hard edges that might cause some people problems.
helping-hand.jpg
Please support this site

This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.


2 Comparisons

Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.

2.1 PureCadence, PureConnect, & PureFlow

The Brooks Pure range of shoes is intended to be more minimalist, but they're only minimal when compared to a traditional shoe like the Asics GT 2000. I would consider Pure shoes as in the "balanced" category that is part way between minimalist and the massively cushioned Minimax style of shoes. The Pure range all have some over engineering, with pointless features such as the "Nav Band" that puts extra pressure on the top of the foot. It seems that most shoe manufacturers feel the need to justify their prices with some type of gimmick rather than producing simple, effective shoes, which is a shame. To evaluate the three shoes, it's best to look at how they compare to the PureFlow, which is the middle ground.

  • PureFlow and PureCadence. The PureCadence has a slightly thicker midsole than the PureFlow, but it's also a little firmer. The PureCadence also adds a Medial Post which makes the shoe a little firmer, but this breaks down remarkably quickly.
  • PureFlow and PureConnect. The PureConnect has a little less cushioning than the PureFlow, though they are remarkably similar, even when wearing one on each foot. I did notice that the gaps in the midsole of the PureFlow do create a slightly uneven, "lumpy" feel underfoot.
Brooks PureCadence 3 top
Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom
Brooks PureCadence 3 inside
Brooks PureCadence 3 outside
Brooks PureConnect 3 top
Brooks PureConnect 3 bottom
Brooks PureConnect 3 inside
Brooks PureConnect 3 outside
Brooks Pure Flow 3 top
Brooks Pure Flow 3 bottom
Brooks Pure Flow 3 inside
Brooks Pure Flow 3 outside

2.2 PureCadence and Hoka Clifton

Comparing the PureCadence and the Hoka Clifton, the Clifton wins out due to its lightness and cushioning.

  • Similarities
    • Shape. Neither has a good toe box.
    • Drop. Neither is zero-drop, though the softer cushioning of the Clifton makes the drop far less noticeable.
    • Longevity. The extra outsole on the PureCadence improves longevity, but it's foam breaks down more quickly.
  • Advantage PureCadence
    • Flexibility. The PureCadence is a bit more flexible.
    • Grip. The PureCadence has slightly more grip.
    • Price. The PureCadence is cheaper.
    • Availability. The PureCadence is widely stocked.
  • Advantage Hoka Clifton
    • Cushioning . The Clifton has far thicker, softer cushioning.
    • Weight. The Clifton is lighter.
    • Trails. The Clifton has a little more protection on rocky trails.
Brooks PureCadence 3 top
Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom
Brooks PureCadence 3 inside
Brooks PureCadence 3 outside
Hoka OneOne Clifton top
Hoka OneOne Clifton bottom
Hoka OneOne Clifton inside
Hoka OneOne Clifton outside

2.3 PureCadence and Altra One2

Comparing the PureCadence and the Altra One2, the Altra wins on weight and cushioning, but the PureCadence will last longer:

  • Advantage PureCadence
    • Price. The PureCadence is cheaper, especially when longevity is considered.
    • Grip. The PureCadence has more grip.
    • Availability. The PureCadence is widely stocked.
    • Trails. The PureCadence has more protection from rocks.
    • Longevity. The PureCadence lasts longer.
  • Advantage Altra One2
    • Cushioning . The Altra is a lot more softly cushioned.
    • Weight. The Altra is a lot lighter.
    • Drop. The Altra is zero drop, the PureCadence has 4mm.
    • Shape. The Altra has a much better toe box.
    • Flexibility. The Altra is more flexible.
Brooks PureCadence 3 top
Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom
Brooks PureCadence 3 inside
Brooks PureCadence 3 outside
Altra One2 top
Altra One2 bottom
Altra One2 inside
Altra One2 outside

2.4 PureCadence and Saucony Virrata

Comparing the PureCadence and the Saucony Virrata:

  • Similarities
    • Shape. Neither has a good toe box.
    • Availability. The both are reasonably easy to find.
  • Advantage PureCadence
    • Grip. The PureCadence has more grip.
    • Longevity. The PureCadence lasts longer.
    • Trails. The PureCadence has more protection from rocks.
    • Cushioning . The PureCadence is more softly cushioned.
  • Advantage Saucony Virrata
    • Drop. The Virrata is zero-drop, the PureCadence is 4mm.
    • Weight. The Virrata is a lot lighter.
    • Price. The Virrata is a little cheaper.
    • Flexibility. The Virrata is more flexible.
Brooks PureCadence 3 top
Brooks PureCadence 3 bottom
Brooks PureCadence 3 inside
Brooks PureCadence 3 outside
Saucony Virrata top
Saucony Virrata bottom
Saucony Virrata inside
Saucony Virrata outside

3 A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes

trophy-winner.jpg

If you're looking for "the best of the best" running shoe, here are my top picks. Of course, the answer will depend a little on what you're looking for, so I have recommendations for various categories.

  • Best All Round Shoe. The Altra Escalante is my current all-round favorite. It has plenty of cushioning for its weight, it has a very springy midsole, it lasts well, and it has a shape that's closer to the shape of a human foot than most shoes. It's a great shoe for any runner, including those Starting to run. It's also a fairly easy shoe to find due to its popularity.
  • Best Maximalist Shoe: If you want something massively cushioned, then I'd recommend the Saucony Kinvara 8. It's remarkably light and remarkably cushioned, beating Hoka at their own game.
  • Best Optimal Shoe: For those looking to trade cushioning for speed, the Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 was my top pick, but the latest version (LT 4) falls short of it's predecessor. There are lots of great optimal running shoes, which provide just enough cushioning with light weight and minimal frills, but all have their weak spots. Probably the best option at the moment is the Altra Vanish-R, which offers great cushioning for just over 5oz/150g.
  • Fastest Shoe: If you really want speed, then check out the Nike Vaporfly 4%. It's light, massively cushioned, and has a carbon fiber plate. Nothing comes close, not even the now defunct New Balance RC5000‏‎ or New Balance RC5000v2‏‎. There are a number of caveats; it's really expensive, it's really hard to find, and there's a significant injury risk.
  • Best Minimalist Shoe: Merrell Trail Glove. I recommend the trail glove for road running in spite of the 'trail' moniker. It's not a fast shoe by any means, but it's comfortable and will last well.
  • All Terrain Shoe. For trail running, I've become a fan of Altra, and I think their best shoe is the the Altra Timp, though the Altra Lone Peak is really close.
  • Honorable Mention: It's not really a running shoe, but the Vivobarefoot Ra is comfortable, minimalist and can more or less pass as a dress shoe. I've worn mine to weddings with a suit and they've not looked out of place. You can run in the Ra, but the leather means it doesn't breathe well.

For a more detailed on running shoes see the Recommendations for Best Running Shoes. This table lists the key attributes of What to Look for in Running Shoes. For more detailed information, on the shoes see detailed shoe comparison.

Full Review

Brand Name Rating Recommended
price 		Benefit Weight
(oz) 		Penalty
(sec/mile) 		Forefoot
Thickness 		Heel
Thickness 		Loaded Drop
mm 		Cushioning Flexibility
Saucony Type A Review Saucony A/A7 Recommended $100 6.4 6.7 12.1 19 22 1 4.3 7
Saucony Type A6 Review Saucony A6 Highly Recommended $100 8.2 6.1 9.5 17 21 4 5.0 7
Saucony Type A8 Review Saucony A8 Highly Recommended $90 7.5 6.2 9.7 19 20 -1 4.7 7
Adidas Adios Boost 2 Review Adidas Adios Worth considering $140 4.7 8.6 13.4 17 27 11 4.0 6
Hoka Bondi 5 Review Hoka Bondi Recommended $150 6.1 11.6 18.1 38 42 5 7.1 2
Hoka Clayton 2 Review Hoka Clayton2 Highly Recommended $150 9.1 8.3 12.9 23 28 1 7.5 5
Hoka Clifton 4 Review Hoka Clifton4 Worth considering $130 7.7 9.3 14.5 30 35 10 7.2 3
ON Cloudflash Review On Cloud Cloudflash Worth considering $180 4.4 8.3 14.6 19 26 7 3.7 6
On Cloudracer Review On Cloud Cloudracer Worth considering $130 5.7 8.2 12.8 19 27 5 4.7 7
ON Cloud X Review On Cloud CloudX Not recommended $140 4.5 8.3 16.3 21 27 7 3.8 7
Mizuno Wave Cruise Review Mizuno Cruise Worth considering $120 6.6 5.9 12.5 17 20 7 3.9 6
Newton Distance IV Review Newton Distance Worth considering $155 7.5 9.1 14.2 26 31 3 6.8 5
Asics Gel DS Racer 10 Review Asics DS Racer Worth considering $110 8.2 7.0 10.9 21 26 6 5.8 5
Altra Duo Review Altra Duo Recommended $130 6.0 8.4 13.1 29 29 1 5.0 5
Mizuno Wave Ekiden 8 Review Mizuno Ekiden Worth considering $115 5.7 5.7 14.6 13 18 6 3.2 8
Saucony Endorphin 2 Review Saucony Endorphin 2 Worth considering $115 8.0 5.1 9.6 15 13 -1 4.1 8
Adidas Energy Boost Review Adidas Energy Worth considering $160 7.2 10.0 15.6 20 30 7 7.2 5
Altra Escalante Review Altra Escalante Best of the Best $130 9.1 8.7 13.5 28 25 -1 7.9 6
Altra Escalante 1.5 Review Altra Escalante 1.5 Best of the Best $130 8.2 9.0 14.0 26 27 -1 7.4 7
Saucony Fastwitch Review Saucony Fastwitch Highly Recommended $90 9.5 7.1 11.1 20 22 4 6.8 7
Topo Fli-Lyte 2 Review Topo Fli-Lyte2 Highly Recommended $100 6.7 9.1 14.2 24 26 3 6.1 5
Reebok Floatride Run Review Reebok Floatride Worth considering $150 7.7 9.6 14.9 28 34 10 7.4 5
Saucony Freedom Review Saucony Freedom Recommended $160 5.4 10.7 16.6 25 29 3 5.8 6
Skechers GORun 4 Review Skechers GORun Not recommended $100 6.1 7.5 11.7 15 23 3 4.5 7
Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 Review Skechers GRU Worth considering $90 7.5 10.0 15.6 28 34 8 7.5 4
Asics GT 2000 Review Asics GT 2000 Not recommended $120 4.8 11.2 17.4 28 35 5 5.4 2
New Balance Hanzo S Review New Balance Hanzo Worth considering $110 7.6 6.9 10.7 21 19 2 5.2 5
Hoka Hupana Review Hoka Hupana Recommended $115 6.1 8.9 13.9 31 36 7 5.4 4
Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 Review Asics Hyper Speed Highly Recommended $75 10.9 6.3 9.8 22 26 5 6.8 6
Altra Instinct 4.0 Review Altra Instinct 4.0 Worth considering $120 6.0 9.8 15.3 29 25 -1 5.9 5
Asics Tarther Kainos 3 Review Asics Kainos Worth considering $130 10.0 6.9 10.7 17 27 9 6.8 6
Altra King MT 1.5 Review Altra King MT Recommended $140 7.5 10.7 16.7 19 21 3 8.0 5
Saucony Kinvara 8 Review Saucony Kinvara 8 Best of the Best $110 9.3 8.6 13.4 26 31 3 8.0 5
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Review Altra Lone Peak Highly Recommended $120 4.2 11.4 17.7 24 25 4 4.8 5
Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 Review Nike LT3 Best of the Best $80 9.8 5.4 8.4 16 21 5 5.3 7
Nike Zoom Streak LT 4 Review Nike LT4 Recommended $90 8.5 5.5 8.5 15 21 3 4.6 6
Nike LunarSpider R5 Review Nike LunarSpider Recommended $125 6.9 6.7 10.4 17 21 3 4.6 6
Hoka Mafate Speed Review Hoka Mafate Best of the Best $170 7.6 11.9 18.5 39 40 4 9.0 1
Pearl Izumi EM Road N0 v2 Review Pearl N0 Highly Recommended $100 7.9 6.5 10.1 14 20 4 5.2 8
Saucony Nomad Review Saucony Nomad Worth considering $110 4.3 10.5 17.2 25 27 2 4.5 4
Hoka Odyssey Review Hoka Odyssey Highly Recommended $130 8.5 9.4 14.6 37 45 5 8.0 3
Altra Olympus 2.5 Review Altra Olympus Highly Recommended $150 4.6 11.8 18.4 35 34 0 5.4 6
Altra One 3.0 Review Altra One Recommended $100 6.1 8.8 13.7 23 23 0 5.4 6
Altra Paradigm 4.0 Review Altra Paradigm Highly Recommended $150 5.3 11.0 17.1 28 30 5 5.8 8
Asics Piranha SP 5 Review Asics Piranha Recommended $100 10.1 4.2 6.5 11 15 3 4.2 9
Brooks PureFlow 5 Review Brooks PureFlow Worth considering $110 6.0 9.7 15.1 26 29 5 5.8 8
Salming Race Review Salming Race Worth considering $130 6.9 6.5 10.1 16 19 4 4.5 6
Altra Escalante Racer Review Altra Racer Highly Recommended $140 6.6 7.6 11.8 24 26 6 5.0 8
New Balance RC1600 v2 Review New Balance RC1600 Highly Recommended $110 8.8 5.6 8.7 15 21 5 4.9 8
New Balance RC5000v2 Review New Balance RC5000v2 Best of the Best $125 14.2 4.0 6.2 13 21 6 5.7 7
Skechers GoRun Ride 3 Review Skechers Ride Worth considering $85 5.9 8.5 13.2 18 28 6 5.0 8
Nike RN Distance 2 Review Nike RNDist2 Worth considering $120 8.0 9.2 14.3 25 28 4 7.4 7
Inov-8 RoadXTreme 220 Review Inov-8 RXT-220 Worth considering $120 5.2 8.0 18.2 14 17 3 4.2 8
Salomon Sense Ride Review Salomon Sense Worth considering $120 8.5 10.0 15.6 26 29 6 8.5 0
Altra Solstice Review Altra Solstice Highly Recommended $90 7.1 8.1 12.5 23 25 0 5.7 5
Topo ST-2 Review Topo ST-2 Highly Recommended $90 8.2 7.3 11.4 20 18 0 6.0 7
Hoka Stinson Lite Review Hoka Stinson Highly Recommended $160 7.3 11.6 18.1 35 40 6 8.5 0
Altra Superior Altra Superior Highly Recommended $110 5.6 9.9 15.5 21 25 -1 5.5 4
Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Review Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Highly Recommended $160 7.7 6.6 10.2 17 21 4 5.1 5
Topo Terraventure Topo Terraventure Review Pending $110 2.6 10.8 27.5 24 24 0 2.8 10
Altra Timp Review Altra Timp Best of the Best $130 3.7 11.6 18.1 30 31 -1 4.3 6
Altra Torin 2.0 Review Altra Torin Worth considering $125 3.4 9.6 20.7 30 25 1 3.3 9
Altra Torin 3.5 Review Altra Torin 3.5 Worth considering $125 5.8 9.3 14.5 27 28 0 5.4 8
Hoka Tracer Review Hoka Tracer Recommended $130 7.2 7.4 11.5 21 24 2 5.3 5
Merrell Trail Glove 4 Review Merrell Trail Glove 4 Best of the Best $100 3.4 8.4 23.8 13 13 0 2.8 10
Topo Tribute Review Topo Tribute Recommended $100 5.9 7.3 11.4 20 18 -1 4.3 6
Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review Mizuno Universe Highly Recommended $125 10.7 3.1 10.6 9 12 1 3.3 9
Altra Vanish-R Review Altra Vanish-R Recommended $100 16.1 5.3 8.2 19 21 4 8.5 6
Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Review Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Highly Recommended $85 2.1 6.1 27.6 6 5 0 1.3 10
Nike Vaporfly 4% Review Nike Vaporfly Best of the Best $250 10.4 7.2 11.2 25 37 8 7.5 2
New Balance Vazee Pace Review New Balance Vazee Pace Worth considering $110 6.0 8.6 13.4 18 24 6 5.2 5
Asics TartherZeal 3 Review Asics Zeal Worth considering $140 10.9 6.3 9.8 17 27 9 6.8 6
Saucony Zealot 3 Review Saucony Zealot3 Recommended $130 8.9 9.5 14.8 29 32 4 8.5 6
Nike Zoom Fly Review Nike Zoom Fly Worth considering $150 8.3 8.7 13.5 29 36 8 7.2 3

It's not a running shoe, but I love the Hoka Tor Ultra hiking boot and I've tested the Altra Lone Peak Boot, the Hoka Tor Speed 2, and the Inov-8 Roclite 325 hiking boots
Older shoe reviews: Saucony Hattori Review, Mizuno Cursoris Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, Hoka Clifton Review, Saucony Virrata 2 Review, Brooks PureCadence 3 Review, Brooks PureConnect 3 Review, Brooks PureFlow 3 Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, New Balance 980 Review, Brooks Transcend 2 Review, Hoka Huaka Review, Patagonia EVERlong Review, Asics 33-DFA Review, Hoka Conquest Review, Saucony Cortana Review, Puma Faas 100 R Review, Saucony Fastwitch Review, Nike Free Review, Asics Gel Lyte 33 Review, Skechers GOmeb Speed Review, Skechers GOrun Ultra Road Review, Nike LunaRacer Review, Altra Paradigm Review.

Retrieved from "http://fellrnr.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Brooks_PureCadence&oldid=6481"