Difference between revisions of "Skechers GoRun Ride"
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) |
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) m (comment: batch update) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Skechers GORun Ride 3 Review}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Skechers GORun Ride 3 Review}} | ||
| − | The Skechers GORun | + | The Skechers GORun Ride 3 feels like a great shoe when you first put it on. The shape is closer to the human foot than most shoes, the upper is well padded and the midsole seams really soft. However, after a few miles you realize that the softness is more 'squishy' than cushioned, with little spring and the upper is overly thick. Running further reveals the rapid wear of the exposed midsole, reducing its lifespan. The saving grace for the Ride may be in winter use, where it preserves more of its cushioning than most shoes and its warm upper becomes an advantage. The Skechers naming is a bit confusing; these are the GORun Ride, not the [[Skechers GORun]]. I've rated it as "Worth Considering." {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}} |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* {{H:WhyBuy}}. The GORun Ride is tough to recommend except for winter use where it retains more cushioning than most shoes and its thicker upper becomes an advantage. However, like most shoes it would have poor traction on snow or ice. | * {{H:WhyBuy}}. The GORun Ride is tough to recommend except for winter use where it retains more cushioning than most shoes and its thicker upper becomes an advantage. However, like most shoes it would have poor traction on snow or ice. | ||
* {{H:cushioning}}. The GORun Ride has a very soft midsole, with an egg-crate effect on the bottom to further soften the earliest phase of the impact. However, the initial impression of softness is a bit of an illusion. I think the problem is that the GORun Ride is quite soft as the foot first touches down, but the midsole is not thick enough for the soft foam, and while it doesn't "bottom out", the cushioning is not progressive. I also found that the GORun Ride felt more "squishy" than cushioned, with little rebound. Running in the Ride felt more like running on sand than running on a nicely cushioned track. When swapping back and forth between the Ride and the [[Hoka Clifton]], this difference is highlighted, with the Clifton feeling springy by comparison. However, the Ride does retain quite a lot of its cushioning when cold (~0f/-10c), though not as much as the [[Hoka Mafate]]. | * {{H:cushioning}}. The GORun Ride has a very soft midsole, with an egg-crate effect on the bottom to further soften the earliest phase of the impact. However, the initial impression of softness is a bit of an illusion. I think the problem is that the GORun Ride is quite soft as the foot first touches down, but the midsole is not thick enough for the soft foam, and while it doesn't "bottom out", the cushioning is not progressive. I also found that the GORun Ride felt more "squishy" than cushioned, with little rebound. Running in the Ride felt more like running on sand than running on a nicely cushioned track. When swapping back and forth between the Ride and the [[Hoka Clifton]], this difference is highlighted, with the Clifton feeling springy by comparison. However, the Ride does retain quite a lot of its cushioning when cold (~0f/-10c), though not as much as the [[Hoka Mafate]]. | ||
| − | * {{H:drop}}. While the GORun | + | * {{H:drop}}. While the GORun Ride has an awful 10mm of drop, when the shoe is loaded this is reduced to 6mm and feels slightly less in practice. |
| − | * {{H:structure}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:structure}}. The GORun Ride has a single density of foam, but the inside (medial) of the heel is raise up rather dramatically in an effort to reduce [[Pronation]]. I found this rather intrusive and uncomfortable. I also found that the outside (lateral) edge of the forefoot was built up a little, further reducing the comfort. |
| − | * {{H:flexibility}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:flexibility}}. The GORun Ride has excellent flexibility probably due to the unusually soft foam used in the midsole. |
| − | * {{H:outsole}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:outsole}}. The GORun Ride has small patches of firmer rubber outsole, seen as red circles in the images of the bottom of the shoe. This is rather sad, as these patches are positioned to make a pretty pattern rather than any functional benefit as they are not in the high abrasion areas. The lack of outsole, combined with soft foam and the egg-crate shape means the Ride wears down really quickly. |
| − | * {{H:shape}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:shape}}. The GORun Ride is one of the few shoes where I've not had to [[Shoe Modifications| cut open the toe box]], and its shape is remarkably close to the human foot. {{H:TryCuttingShoes}} |
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible and a rather thick which makes it less breathable and warmer than I'd like except for winter. It also has quite a few seams, something that's thankfully becoming less common these days. There's a little padding around the rear of the foot, and good padding around the ankle opening. However, the padding around the angle opening comes quite a long way down and I found it presses on the back of the heel bone (Calcaneus). I think this could cause problems for many runners and I disliked it. | * {{H:upper}}. The upper is inflexible and a rather thick which makes it less breathable and warmer than I'd like except for winter. It also has quite a few seams, something that's thankfully becoming less common these days. There's a little padding around the rear of the foot, and good padding around the ankle opening. However, the padding around the angle opening comes quite a long way down and I found it presses on the back of the heel bone (Calcaneus). I think this could cause problems for many runners and I disliked it. | ||
| − | * {{H:tongue}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:tongue}}. The GORun Ride has a traditional tongue that is has a tab to attach it to the laces, with nice soft padding. |
| − | * {{H:lacing}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:lacing}}. The GORun Ride has flat laces that worked well and I never had them come undone. |
| − | * {{H:heelcounter}}. The GORun | + | * {{H:heelcounter}}. The GORun Ride has absolutely no heel counter, which is nice. It goes to show how useless the heel counter is. |
{{BuyShoes|RRS=T|AZ=T|ZP=T}} | {{BuyShoes|RRS=T|AZ=T|ZP=T}} | ||
{{ShoeGraphs}} | {{ShoeGraphs}} | ||
=Comparisons= | =Comparisons= | ||
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition. | Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition. | ||
| − | ==Skechers GORun | + | ==Skechers GORun Ride and the Hoka Clifton== |
| − | The [[Hoka Clifton]] is an amazing shoe, offering [[ | + | The [[Hoka Clifton]] is an amazing shoe, offering [[Maximalist]] cushioning at a remarkably low weight. The Clifton is slightly lighter than the Ride, but the Clifton offers a lot more cushioning, and the cushioning it offers has more spring to it. The Clifton is more expensive to buy, but I think it will work out cheaper per mile due to greater longevity. |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|[[File:Hoka-OneOne-Clifton-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Hoka OneOne Clifton outside]] | |[[File:Hoka-OneOne-Clifton-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Hoka OneOne Clifton outside]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ==Skechers GORun | + | ==Skechers GORun Ride and Saucony Kinvara== |
The [[Saucony Kinvara]] is a good shoe for transitioning between a traditional shoe like the [[Asics GT 2000]] and a much better shoe like the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]. The GORun Ride should be playing in the same space, but its squishy cushioning and lack of comfort disqualify it for most runners. The main advantage the Ride would have is in winter, where it retains a little more cushioning and its thicker upper would be an advantage. | The [[Saucony Kinvara]] is a good shoe for transitioning between a traditional shoe like the [[Asics GT 2000]] and a much better shoe like the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]. The GORun Ride should be playing in the same space, but its squishy cushioning and lack of comfort disqualify it for most runners. The main advantage the Ride would have is in winter, where it retains a little more cushioning and its thicker upper would be an advantage. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|[[File:Saucony-Kinvara-5-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Outside]] | |[[File:Saucony-Kinvara-5-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Outside]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ==Skechers GORun | + | ==Skechers GORun Ride and Asics Gel Hyper Speed== |
The GORun Ride is heavier than the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]], and while the Ride may feel softer, the actually cushioning in the Hyper Speed is greater. | The GORun Ride is heavier than the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]], and while the Ride may feel softer, the actually cushioning in the Hyper Speed is greater. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|[[File:Asics-Gel-Hyper-Speed-6-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 outside]] | |[[File:Asics-Gel-Hyper-Speed-6-outside.jpg|none|thumb|150px|Asics Gel Hyper Speed 6 outside]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | ==Skechers GORun | + | ==Skechers GORun Ride and Asics GT 2000== |
I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the [[Asics GT 2000]]. Here the ride shows the benefits of a transitional shoe, as it's lighter, better cushioned in the heel (though not the forefoot), and a lot more flexible. | I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the [[Asics GT 2000]]. Here the ride shows the benefits of a transitional shoe, as it's lighter, better cushioned in the heel (though not the forefoot), and a lot more flexible. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Latest revision as of 10:58, 3 January 2017
The Skechers GORun Ride 3 feels like a great shoe when you first put it on. The shape is closer to the human foot than most shoes, the upper is well padded and the midsole seams really soft. However, after a few miles you realize that the softness is more 'squishy' than cushioned, with little spring and the upper is overly thick. Running further reveals the rapid wear of the exposed midsole, reducing its lifespan. The saving grace for the Ride may be in winter use, where it preserves more of its cushioning than most shoes and its warm upper becomes an advantage. The Skechers naming is a bit confusing; these are the GORun Ride, not the Skechers GORun. I've rated it as "Worth Considering." (I use The Science of Running Shoes as the basis of how I test running shoes and what you should look for in a running shoe.)
Contents
1 Characteristics
- Why you’d buy it. The GORun Ride is tough to recommend except for winter use where it retains more cushioning than most shoes and its thicker upper becomes an advantage. However, like most shoes it would have poor traction on snow or ice.
- Cushioning . The GORun Ride has a very soft midsole, with an egg-crate effect on the bottom to further soften the earliest phase of the impact. However, the initial impression of softness is a bit of an illusion. I think the problem is that the GORun Ride is quite soft as the foot first touches down, but the midsole is not thick enough for the soft foam, and while it doesn't "bottom out", the cushioning is not progressive. I also found that the GORun Ride felt more "squishy" than cushioned, with little rebound. Running in the Ride felt more like running on sand than running on a nicely cushioned track. When swapping back and forth between the Ride and the Hoka Clifton, this difference is highlighted, with the Clifton feeling springy by comparison. However, the Ride does retain quite a lot of its cushioning when cold (~0f/-10c), though not as much as the Hoka Mafate.
- Drop. While the GORun Ride has an awful 10mm of drop, when the shoe is loaded this is reduced to 6mm and feels slightly less in practice.
- Structure. The GORun Ride has a single density of foam, but the inside (medial) of the heel is raise up rather dramatically in an effort to reduce Pronation. I found this rather intrusive and uncomfortable. I also found that the outside (lateral) edge of the forefoot was built up a little, further reducing the comfort.
- Flexibility. The GORun Ride has excellent flexibility probably due to the unusually soft foam used in the midsole.
- Outsole. The GORun Ride has small patches of firmer rubber outsole, seen as red circles in the images of the bottom of the shoe. This is rather sad, as these patches are positioned to make a pretty pattern rather than any functional benefit as they are not in the high abrasion areas. The lack of outsole, combined with soft foam and the egg-crate shape means the Ride wears down really quickly.
- Shape. The GORun Ride is one of the few shoes where I've not had to cut open the toe box, and its shape is remarkably close to the human foot. (I recommend cutting open the toe box of virtually all running shoes, with the exception of a few shoes like some Altra shoes. When you have some worn out shoes, you should try cutting open the toe box. I've found that it's a big improvement, allowing my toes to move naturally and engage for toe off, as well as reducing the possibility of blisters.)
- Upper. The upper is inflexible and a rather thick which makes it less breathable and warmer than I'd like except for winter. It also has quite a few seams, something that's thankfully becoming less common these days. There's a little padding around the rear of the foot, and good padding around the ankle opening. However, the padding around the angle opening comes quite a long way down and I found it presses on the back of the heel bone (Calcaneus). I think this could cause problems for many runners and I disliked it.
- Tongue. The GORun Ride has a traditional tongue that is has a tab to attach it to the laces, with nice soft padding.
- Lacing. The GORun Ride has flat laces that worked well and I never had them come undone.
- Heel Counter. The GORun Ride has absolutely no heel counter, which is nice. It goes to show how useless the heel counter is.
| This review was made possible by readers like you buying products via my links. I buy all the products I review through normal retail channels, which allows me to create unbiased reviews free from the influence of reciprocity, or the need to keep vendors happy. It also ensures I don't get "reviewer specials" that are better than the retail versions.
|
2 Cushioning and Shoes
It's intuitively obvious that the cushioning in a shoe will reduce the impact on your body when running. However, The Science of Running Shoes indicates that the reality is rather more complex. While slight cushioning may reduce the effort needed to run by improving your Running Economy, most scientific research indicates that more cushioning does further improve Running Economy. In addition, cushioning does not generally reduce impact and may actually increase it. This is counterintuitive, but is likely to be due to the way a runners mind and body adapts to softer cushioning. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence is far from complete and it's hard to give clear recommendations. I believe that some runners will prefer more cushioning, while others prefer less, and typically those running further have a fondness for greater cushioning. I also believe that a shoe should be as light as possible, and a shoe should justify its weight with the cushioning it provides. My advice is to decide what level of cushioning you're looking for, and then find the lightest shoes that also fit well and are comfortable.
3 Visualizing the Attributes of the Skechers GoRun Ride
4 Comparisons
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.
4.1 Skechers GORun Ride and the Hoka Clifton
The Hoka Clifton is an amazing shoe, offering Maximalist cushioning at a remarkably low weight. The Clifton is slightly lighter than the Ride, but the Clifton offers a lot more cushioning, and the cushioning it offers has more spring to it. The Clifton is more expensive to buy, but I think it will work out cheaper per mile due to greater longevity.
4.2 Skechers GORun Ride and Saucony Kinvara
The Saucony Kinvara is a good shoe for transitioning between a traditional shoe like the Asics GT 2000 and a much better shoe like the Asics Gel Hyper Speed. The GORun Ride should be playing in the same space, but its squishy cushioning and lack of comfort disqualify it for most runners. The main advantage the Ride would have is in winter, where it retains a little more cushioning and its thicker upper would be an advantage.
4.3 Skechers GORun Ride and Asics Gel Hyper Speed
The GORun Ride is heavier than the Asics Gel Hyper Speed, and while the Ride may feel softer, the actually cushioning in the Hyper Speed is greater.
4.4 Skechers GORun Ride and Asics GT 2000
I tend to compare shoes against my benchmark "normal running shoe", the Asics GT 2000. Here the ride shows the benefits of a transitional shoe, as it's lighter, better cushioned in the heel (though not the forefoot), and a lot more flexible.
5 A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes
| If you're looking for "the best of the best" running shoe, here are my top picks. Of course, the answer will depend a little on what you're looking for, so I have recommendations for various categories.
|
For a more detailed on running shoes see the Recommendations for Best Running Shoes. This table lists the key attributes of What to Look for in Running Shoes. For more detailed information, on the shoes see detailed shoe comparison.
|
Full Review |
Brand | Name | Rating | Recommended price |
Benefit | Weight (oz) |
Penalty (sec/mile) |
Forefoot Thickness |
Heel Thickness |
Loaded Drop mm |
Cushioning | Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saucony Type A Review | Saucony | A/A7 | Recommended | $100 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 12.1 | 19 | 22 | 1 | 4.3 | 7 |
| Saucony Type A6 Review | Saucony | A6 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 8.2 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 17 | 21 | 4 | 5.0 | 7 |
| Saucony Type A8 Review | Saucony | A8 | Highly Recommended | $90 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 9.7 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 4.7 | 7 |
| Adidas Adios Boost 2 Review | Adidas | Adios | Worth considering | $140 | 4.7 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 17 | 27 | 11 | 4.0 | 6 |
| Hoka Bondi 5 Review | Hoka | Bondi | Recommended | $150 | 6.1 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 38 | 42 | 5 | 7.1 | 2 |
| Hoka Clayton 2 Review | Hoka | Clayton2 | Highly Recommended | $150 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 12.9 | 23 | 28 | 1 | 7.5 | 5 |
| Hoka Clifton 4 Review | Hoka | Clifton4 | Worth considering | $130 | 7.7 | 9.3 | 14.5 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 7.2 | 3 |
| ON Cloudflash Review | On Cloud | Cloudflash | Worth considering | $180 | 4.4 | 8.3 | 14.6 | 19 | 26 | 7 | 3.7 | 6 |
| On Cloudracer Review | On Cloud | Cloudracer | Worth considering | $130 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 12.8 | 19 | 27 | 5 | 4.7 | 7 |
| ON Cloud X Review | On Cloud | CloudX | Not recommended | $140 | 4.5 | 8.3 | 16.3 | 21 | 27 | 7 | 3.8 | 7 |
| Mizuno Wave Cruise Review | Mizuno | Cruise | Worth considering | $120 | 6.6 | 5.9 | 12.5 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 3.9 | 6 |
| Newton Distance IV Review | Newton | Distance | Worth considering | $155 | 7.5 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 6.8 | 5 |
| Asics Gel DS Racer 10 Review | Asics | DS Racer | Worth considering | $110 | 8.2 | 7.0 | 10.9 | 21 | 26 | 6 | 5.8 | 5 |
| Altra Duo Review | Altra | Duo | Recommended | $130 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 13.1 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 5.0 | 5 |
| Mizuno Wave Ekiden 8 Review | Mizuno | Ekiden | Worth considering | $115 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 14.6 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 3.2 | 8 |
| Saucony Endorphin 2 Review | Saucony | Endorphin 2 | Worth considering | $115 | 8.0 | 5.1 | 9.6 | 15 | 13 | -1 | 4.1 | 8 |
| Adidas Energy Boost Review | Adidas | Energy | Worth considering | $160 | 7.2 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 20 | 30 | 7 | 7.2 | 5 |
| Altra Escalante Review | Altra | Escalante | Best of the Best | $130 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 28 | 25 | -1 | 7.9 | 6 |
| Altra Escalante 1.5 Review | Altra | Escalante 1.5 | Best of the Best | $130 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 26 | 27 | -1 | 7.4 | 7 |
| Saucony Fastwitch Review | Saucony | Fastwitch | Highly Recommended | $90 | 9.5 | 7.1 | 11.1 | 20 | 22 | 4 | 6.8 | 7 |
| Topo Fli-Lyte 2 Review | Topo | Fli-Lyte2 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 6.7 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 24 | 26 | 3 | 6.1 | 5 |
| Reebok Floatride Run Review | Reebok | Floatride | Worth considering | $150 | 7.7 | 9.6 | 14.9 | 28 | 34 | 10 | 7.4 | 5 |
| Saucony Freedom Review | Saucony | Freedom | Recommended | $160 | 5.4 | 10.7 | 16.6 | 25 | 29 | 3 | 5.8 | 6 |
| Skechers GORun 4 Review | Skechers | GORun | Not recommended | $100 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 11.7 | 15 | 23 | 3 | 4.5 | 7 |
| Skechers GOrun Ultra 2 Review | Skechers | GRU | Worth considering | $90 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 28 | 34 | 8 | 7.5 | 4 |
| Asics GT 2000 Review | Asics | GT 2000 | Not recommended | $120 | 4.8 | 11.2 | 17.4 | 28 | 35 | 5 | 5.4 | 2 |
| New Balance Hanzo S Review | New Balance | Hanzo | Worth considering | $110 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 10.7 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 5.2 | 5 |
| Hoka Hupana Review | Hoka | Hupana | Recommended | $115 | 6.1 | 8.9 | 13.9 | 31 | 36 | 7 | 5.4 | 4 |
| Asics Gel Hyper Speed 7 Review | Asics | Hyper Speed | Highly Recommended | $75 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 22 | 26 | 5 | 6.8 | 6 |
| Altra Instinct 4.0 Review | Altra | Instinct 4.0 | Worth considering | $120 | 6.0 | 9.8 | 15.3 | 29 | 25 | -1 | 5.9 | 5 |
| Asics Tarther Kainos 3 Review | Asics | Kainos | Worth considering | $130 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 10.7 | 17 | 27 | 9 | 6.8 | 6 |
| Altra King MT 1.5 Review | Altra | King MT | Recommended | $140 | 7.5 | 10.7 | 16.7 | 19 | 21 | 3 | 8.0 | 5 |
| Saucony Kinvara 8 Review | Saucony | Kinvara 8 | Best of the Best | $110 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 26 | 31 | 3 | 8.0 | 5 |
| Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Review | Altra | Lone Peak | Highly Recommended | $120 | 4.2 | 11.4 | 17.7 | 24 | 25 | 4 | 4.8 | 5 |
| Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 Review | Nike | LT3 | Best of the Best | $80 | 9.8 | 5.4 | 8.4 | 16 | 21 | 5 | 5.3 | 7 |
| Nike Zoom Streak LT 4 Review | Nike | LT4 | Recommended | $90 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 4.6 | 6 |
| Nike LunarSpider R5 Review | Nike | LunarSpider | Recommended | $125 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 10.4 | 17 | 21 | 3 | 4.6 | 6 |
| Hoka Mafate Speed Review | Hoka | Mafate | Best of the Best | $170 | 7.6 | 11.9 | 18.5 | 39 | 40 | 4 | 9.0 | 1 |
| Pearl Izumi EM Road N0 v2 Review | Pearl | N0 | Highly Recommended | $100 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 14 | 20 | 4 | 5.2 | 8 |
| Saucony Nomad Review | Saucony | Nomad | Worth considering | $110 | 4.3 | 10.5 | 17.2 | 25 | 27 | 2 | 4.5 | 4 |
| Hoka Odyssey Review | Hoka | Odyssey | Highly Recommended | $130 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 14.6 | 37 | 45 | 5 | 8.0 | 3 |
| Altra Olympus 2.5 Review | Altra | Olympus | Highly Recommended | $150 | 4.6 | 11.8 | 18.4 | 35 | 34 | 0 | 5.4 | 6 |
| Altra One 3.0 Review | Altra | One | Recommended | $100 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 13.7 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 5.4 | 6 |
| Altra Paradigm 4.0 Review | Altra | Paradigm | Highly Recommended | $150 | 5.3 | 11.0 | 17.1 | 28 | 30 | 5 | 5.8 | 8 |
| Asics Piranha SP 5 Review | Asics | Piranha | Recommended | $100 | 10.1 | 4.2 | 6.5 | 11 | 15 | 3 | 4.2 | 9 |
| Brooks PureFlow 5 Review | Brooks | PureFlow | Worth considering | $110 | 6.0 | 9.7 | 15.1 | 26 | 29 | 5 | 5.8 | 8 |
| Salming Race Review | Salming | Race | Worth considering | $130 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 10.1 | 16 | 19 | 4 | 4.5 | 6 |
| Altra Escalante Racer Review | Altra | Racer | Highly Recommended | $140 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 11.8 | 24 | 26 | 6 | 5.0 | 8 |
| New Balance RC1600 v2 Review | New Balance | RC1600 | Highly Recommended | $110 | 8.8 | 5.6 | 8.7 | 15 | 21 | 5 | 4.9 | 8 |
| New Balance RC5000v2 Review | New Balance | RC5000v2 | Best of the Best | $125 | 14.2 | 4.0 | 6.2 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 5.7 | 7 |
| Skechers GoRun Ride 3 Review | Skechers | Ride | Worth considering | $85 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 13.2 | 18 | 28 | 6 | 5.0 | 8 |
| Nike RN Distance 2 Review | Nike | RNDist2 | Worth considering | $120 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 14.3 | 25 | 28 | 4 | 7.4 | 7 |
| Inov-8 RoadXTreme 220 Review | Inov-8 | RXT-220 | Worth considering | $120 | 5.2 | 8.0 | 18.2 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 4.2 | 8 |
| Salomon Sense Ride Review | Salomon | Sense | Worth considering | $120 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 26 | 29 | 6 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Altra Solstice Review | Altra | Solstice | Highly Recommended | $90 | 7.1 | 8.1 | 12.5 | 23 | 25 | 0 | 5.7 | 5 |
| Topo ST-2 Review | Topo | ST-2 | Highly Recommended | $90 | 8.2 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 6.0 | 7 |
| Hoka Stinson Lite Review | Hoka | Stinson | Highly Recommended | $160 | 7.3 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 35 | 40 | 6 | 8.5 | 0 |
| Altra Superior | Altra | Superior | Highly Recommended | $110 | 5.6 | 9.9 | 15.5 | 21 | 25 | -1 | 5.5 | 4 |
| Adidas Takumi Sen 3 Review | Adidas | Takumi Sen 3 | Highly Recommended | $160 | 7.7 | 6.6 | 10.2 | 17 | 21 | 4 | 5.1 | 5 |
| Topo Terraventure | Topo | Terraventure | Review Pending | $110 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 27.5 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 2.8 | 10 |
| Altra Timp Review | Altra | Timp | Best of the Best | $130 | 3.7 | 11.6 | 18.1 | 30 | 31 | -1 | 4.3 | 6 |
| Altra Torin 2.0 Review | Altra | Torin | Worth considering | $125 | 3.4 | 9.6 | 20.7 | 30 | 25 | 1 | 3.3 | 9 |
| Altra Torin 3.5 Review | Altra | Torin 3.5 | Worth considering | $125 | 5.8 | 9.3 | 14.5 | 27 | 28 | 0 | 5.4 | 8 |
| Hoka Tracer Review | Hoka | Tracer | Recommended | $130 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 11.5 | 21 | 24 | 2 | 5.3 | 5 |
| Merrell Trail Glove 4 Review | Merrell | Trail Glove 4 | Best of the Best | $100 | 3.4 | 8.4 | 23.8 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 2.8 | 10 |
| Topo Tribute Review | Topo | Tribute | Recommended | $100 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 20 | 18 | -1 | 4.3 | 6 |
| Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review | Mizuno | Universe | Highly Recommended | $125 | 10.7 | 3.1 | 10.6 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 3.3 | 9 |
| Altra Vanish-R Review | Altra | Vanish-R | Recommended | $100 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 8.2 | 19 | 21 | 4 | 8.5 | 6 |
| Merrell Vapor Glove 3 Review | Merrell | Vapor Glove 3 | Highly Recommended | $85 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 27.6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1.3 | 10 |
| Nike Vaporfly 4% Review | Nike | Vaporfly | Best of the Best | $250 | 10.4 | 7.2 | 11.2 | 25 | 37 | 8 | 7.5 | 2 |
| New Balance Vazee Pace Review | New Balance | Vazee Pace | Worth considering | $110 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 13.4 | 18 | 24 | 6 | 5.2 | 5 |
| Asics TartherZeal 3 Review | Asics | Zeal | Worth considering | $140 | 10.9 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 17 | 27 | 9 | 6.8 | 6 |
| Saucony Zealot 3 Review | Saucony | Zealot3 | Recommended | $130 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 14.8 | 29 | 32 | 4 | 8.5 | 6 |
| Nike Zoom Fly Review | Nike | Zoom Fly | Worth considering | $150 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 29 | 36 | 8 | 7.2 | 3 |
It's not a running shoe, but I love the Hoka Tor Ultra hiking boot and I've tested the Altra Lone Peak Boot, the Hoka Tor Speed 2, and the Inov-8 Roclite 325 hiking boots
Older shoe reviews: Saucony Hattori Review, Mizuno Cursoris Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, Hoka Clifton Review, Saucony Virrata 2 Review, Brooks PureCadence 3 Review, Brooks PureConnect 3 Review, Brooks PureFlow 3 Review, Skechers GO Bionic 2 Review, New Balance 980 Review, Brooks Transcend 2 Review, Hoka Huaka Review, Patagonia EVERlong Review, Asics 33-DFA Review, Hoka Conquest Review, Saucony Cortana Review, Puma Faas 100 R Review, Saucony Fastwitch Review, Nike Free Review, Asics Gel Lyte 33 Review, Skechers GOmeb Speed Review, Skechers GOrun Ultra Road Review, Nike LunaRacer Review, Altra Paradigm Review.
