Evidence based overview of training considerations for lifelong older runners
TLDR: For lifelong runners, training should be based on current fitness, injury history, and overall health, rather than age. While we will all get slower as we age, it's less of a decline in lifelong athletes than often expected. However, all the things younger runners should do, (speedwork, strength training, protein intake, sleep, etc.) apply at least as much to older runners. Older female runners should consider HRT. (Older sedentary people starting to run need to adjust based on their potentially much lower starting fitness then younger sedentary people.)
Summary
Older lifelong runners do slow down with age, largely due to reductions in maximal oxygen uptake and maximal heart rate, but performance can be remarkably well preserved into later decades when training is maintained; differences between trained older and younger adults are often smaller than many expect[1]. Strength training, adequate protein intake, and careful management of training load benefit runners of all ages; in lifelong athletes age itself appears to be a secondary modifier compared with current fitness, comorbidities, and injury history, although evidence directly matching young and older athletes by fitness is still limited and must be interpreted cautiously[2][3].
Protein requirements for trained master athletes appear broadly similar to those of younger athletes with comparable training status, even though age related "anabolic resistance" (reduced response to protein) is evident in sedentary older adults. The regular exercise, higher habitual activity, and good metabolic health of masters athletes seem to largely attenuate anabolic resistance[4][5]. Injury risk in runners is high at all ages, but novice status and rapid increases in training load appear to be stronger risk factors than age per se; prior injury is a consistent predictor of future injury and should heavily shape training decisions for older runners who may carry a larger injury history burden[6].
Menopause introduces additional challenges for older female athletes through changes in estrogen, progesterone, and androgen levels that affect thermoregulation, recovery, bone health, and mood. Hormone replacement therapy may help some women, but decisions require individualized risk benefit discussions, attention to absolute as well as relative risk, and awareness of anti-doping regulations for those competing in sports[7].
Overall, for lifelong athletes chronological age should be seen as one factor among many; training should be guided primarily by current fitness, goals, comorbidities, and especially by symptoms, with gradual progression, well planned rest, and regular strength work forming the core of safe performance focused running into older age[8][9].
Scope and disclaimer
This article focuses on fit older runners who have maintained regular training for many years, often referred to as master or lifelong athletes; evidence from this group cannot be directly extrapolated to sedentary older adults who are just starting to exercise.[8] A separate section below briefly addresses older sedentary people who are considering starting to run.
The information provided here is intended for general education for runners and coaches and does not constitute individualized medical advice; older runners, especially those with cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, or complex injury histories, should discuss new or altered training plans, use of medications, or hormone replacement therapy with an appropriate clinician before making changes.[9]. This article aims to offer an evidence informed starting point and to suggest questions that lifelong athletes can raise with their coach or health care professionals rather than to provide diagnostic or prescriptive guidance.
Introduction: should older runners train differently?
Consensus opinion in popular media, coaching culture, and some clinical guidance suggests that older runners should train differently from younger runners, for example doing less high intensity work and more recovery days, emphasising strength work, and being more cautious about injury risk, but these themes are not well supported by research in lifelong athletes[1][8] It's true that in the general population, ageing is associated with declines in maximal oxygen uptake, maximal heart rate, muscle mass, bone mineral density, tendon mechanical properties, balance, sleep quality, and metabolic health, but these trajectories are strongly modified by training volume, intensity, and long term activity patterns, and master athletes frequently show values much closer to younger adults than to age matched sedentary peers.[2][10]
Recent reviews emphasise that training should be individualised primarily by current fitness, comorbidities, injury history, and goals, with chronological age acting as a secondary modifier rather than the main driver of programme design. Unfortunately, most comparative studies do not match older and younger cohorts by initial fitness, body composition, or training load, which limits the ability to attribute observed differences solely to age and constitutes an important evidence gap that should be flagged whenever inferring causality.[9][11]
This article therefore treats age as one influence among many and focuses on lifelong runners who have remained habitually active, unless a section specifically addresses sedentary older adults. Readers should assume that findings from sedentary populations cannot automatically be applied to master athletes without careful consideration of baseline fitness and health status. Statements that rely on extrapolation rather than direct evidence in lifelong athletes are noted explicitly and should be interpreted cautiously.
Performance: are older runners necessarily slower?
Age related changes in peak performance
Analyses of world records and top performances across distances show that peak endurance performance in events such as the 5K and marathon is usually achieved between about twenty and thirty years of age, with relative preservation of performance into the fifth decade and progressively steeper declines thereafter[1][8] World records for five kilometre running remain under twenty minutes in men until approximately eighty years of age and in women until the early seventies, illustrating that highly trained older runners can preserve impressive absolute speeds even when relative performance versus young elite athletes declines.[12]
However, elite records reflect highly selected populations with strong incentives to train, and the representation of older athletes at international championship level is heavily constrained by the lack of age group categories in major events and by sponsorship models that favour younger competitors; therefore, records in masters categories and large race datasets provide a more representative picture of typical age related decline and should be prioritised when describing population trends rather than relying on isolated anecdotes.[8]
Race time distributions and large datasets
Large scale analyses of mass participation 5K and marathon events consistently show a gradual slowing of median and top quartile times with advancing age, but the slope of decline among committed runners is often smaller than non athletes expect, particularly through the forties and fifties.[13] Below is the analyses of over two million 5K times from large databases in 2024, suggesting that the typical slowing per decade within the recreational population is modest until later decades. It's unclear to me how much the decline in performance is due to age rather than other factors. For instance, the incentive to train at an elite level is greater at younger ages as most big competitions such as the Olympics have no age groups. This means that only the fastest ages have a chance of competing. This is compounded by companies that only sponsor the very best, which is youngest. Thus, the top runners above 30 are more likely to be amateur.

Overall, the evidence indicates that age related slowing in lifelong runners is real but not necessarily dramatic until late middle age, and even then it's unclear if the more rapid slowdown is due to age per se, or other factors. As we age, maintained training volume and intensity, along with resistance training and appropriate nutrition, appear to attenuate but not eliminate declines in speed. For many master athletes, performance trajectories may be more strongly shaped by changes in life circumstances, injury accumulation, and training patterns than by age alone, although disentangling these factors remains challenging in the available literature.
Maximal oxygen uptake and maximal heart rate
There are a number of factors that influence due to aging, as shown in the diagram below.

Decline in V̇O2max with age
Maximal oxygen uptake ( V̇O2max) is a major determinant of endurance performance and shows a general decline with advancing age; sedentary adults typically lose about 10-12% per decade after early adulthood, whereas well trained master endurance athletes may limit the decline to roughly 5% per decade when they maintain high training loads.[15][1] Longitudinal data in master runners indicate that decreases in V̇O2max are the strongest physiological correlate of age related performance decline in distance running, exceeding contributions from lactate threshold or running economy in many analyses.[16]
Master athletes typically display much higher absolute V̇O2max values than sedentary age matched peers, often reaching levels similar to or exceeding those of untrained younger adults; this illustrates that habitual training can substantially offset, although not abolish, the age related decline in aerobic capacity and supports training prescriptions that focus on preserving high intensity capacity where appropriate for health status.[17][2]
Maximum heart rate and ageing
Decline in maximal heart rate is one of the clearest cardiovascular changes associated with ageing and is a central contributor to reductions in V̇O2max; classic work in healthy adults reported an approximate one beat per minute per year fall in maximal heart rate across adulthood, although individual variability is large and regular endurance training appears to attenuate but not prevent this trend.[18][19] In trained older runners the fall in maximal heart rate may be somewhat smaller than expected, but maximum heart rate MUST be measured and never calculated at any age[20].
The age related reduction in maximal heart rate, combined with sometimes lower stroke volume and peripheral oxygen extraction, is thought to be a dominant physiological driver of slower race times in older runners rather than mechanical factors alone; however, differentiating the effects of intrinsic cardiac ageing from the cumulative consequences of altered training load, comorbidities, and medications remains challenging, and most mechanistic data come from mixed populations rather than exclusively from lifelong athletes[1]
Strength training in older runners
Do older runners need more strength training than younger runners?
Resistance training confers benefits for muscle mass, strength, power, bone mineral density, and functional performance in older adults, including master athletes, and is recommended at least twice per week for major muscle groups in most consensus guidelines. However, similar benefits are demonstrated in younger runners, and there is no evidence that heavy strength training becomes uniquely necessary only after a specific age threshold for already well trained athletes[21][22]. Studies in master strength and power athletes show that lifelong resistance training preserves muscle cross sectional area and neuromuscular function substantially better than in sedentary age matched adults, though some selective atrophy of fast twitch fibres and reduced rate of force development still occur with age[2].
Do Older Runners Respond Differently To Strength Training?
Some trials suggest that older untrained subjects may show smaller relative hypertrophic responses to standard resistance training programmes than younger untrained adults, yet these studies rarely compare age matched groups with similar training status and health, so apparent age differences may partly reflect baseline inactivity, comorbidities, or inadequate protein intake. Therefore, statements that older lifelong athletes inevitably respond less to strength training than younger athletes should be considered weak and not used to justify nihilistic attitudes toward resistance training in master runners[23].
Recommended resistance training approaches
Current evidence supports at least two non-consecutive days per week of progressive resistance training involving major muscle groups, including the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteal muscles, calf muscles, trunk, and upper body, for older adults and master athletes, with loads and repetition ranges selected to provide a reasonable stimulus for strength and hypertrophy while respecting joint and tendon health[24]. Heavy resistance exercises, high velocity power exercises, and balance challenging movements all appear important for preserving bone mineral density and reducing fall risk in older people, although many trials have studied general older populations rather than specifically lifelong runners; nevertheless, these modalities are usually relevant for master athletes, provided that progression is gradual and aligned with injury history.[25][26]
For master runners, integrating strength training into the weekly schedule can involve substituting some easy mileage for resistance sessions, using short but intense compound movements on days already containing quality running, and allowing extra recovery when starting new heavy or plyometric exercises. Training decisions should be driven by recent injury history, tolerance of eccentric load, and race goals rather than by chronological age alone. It should be noted that high quality trials that directly compare different resistance training frequencies and intensities in younger and older endurance runners of matched fitness are lacking, so detailed age specific prescriptions remain uncertain and should be presented with appropriate caution.
Injury risk in older runners
Do older runners get injured more often?
Running related injury incidence in recreational runners is high, with annual injury risks commonly around 30% in epidemiological studies, but age as an isolated risk factor is less consistently associated with injury than novice status, rapid changes in training load, or history of previous injury[27]. A large prospective cohort study comparing novice and experienced runners reported that novice runners sustained approximately twice as many injuries per thousand hours of running as experienced runners, with annual incidence estimates of roughly thirty four percent in novice runners and thirty one percent in experienced runners when expressed on a calendar year basis; age differences were less prominent than running experience when exposure time was considered.[28]
Accumulated Injuries
One of the strongest predictors of future injury is a history of prior running injury, which may accumulate over time; older lifelong runners therefore may have higher cumulative exposure to injury even if age itself is not an independent risk factor, although there is limited research that separates age from exposure and prior injury in a rigorous way, so this remains an area with relatively weak and indirect evidence[29]. Studies of biomechanical changes with ageing in runners often demonstrate altered stride patterns, joint angles, and landing mechanics, yet most of these investigations recruit convenience samples of older and younger runners without matching training volume or fitness, which limits inferences about whether observed differences are due to age or to disparate training backgrounds and must be explicitly acknowledged as a limitation[30].
Injury prevention priorities
Injury prevention strategies for older runners match those for younger runners. Runners should emphasise careful load management, progressive changes in weekly mileage, and gradual introduction of speed work or terrain changes rather than focusing solely on age based restrictions; this approach is supported by models that conceptualise injury risk as arising when tissue stress exceeds capacity, and those models apply across age groups[31]. (Most runners I know typically start performing interval training with excessive speed, rather than introducing it gradually.) For lifelong athletes with extensive injury histories, regular monitoring of symptoms, willingness to back off early in the course of new niggles, and strategic use of cross training or altered surfaces are often more impactful than arbitrary reductions in training volume simply due to chronological age, though formal trials that test specific load management strategies in older runners remain scarce. (The book "Pain + Performance" by Matt Fitzgerald is recommended reading.)
Protein needs and anabolic resistance in master runners
Protein needs in lifelong athletes
Endurance and strength trained athletes of all ages generally require higher protein intakes than minimally active adults to support muscle protein synthesis, repair, and adaptation; consensus statements and narrative reviews typically recommend around 1.2 – 2.0 grams of protein per kilogram of body mass per day for most training athletes, with intakes toward the higher end during energy deficit or heavy training blocks[32]. A detailed narrative review on master athletes concluded that master endurance and strength athletes with long training histories generally show similar muscle characteristics, exercise responses, and protein metabolism to young athletes and are therefore unlikely to have fundamentally different daily protein requirements from younger contemporaries with comparable training status, although more research is needed to link specific protein strategies directly to performance outcomes in this group[33].
The same review suggested that practical protein recommendations for master athletes can mirror those for younger athletes, for example distributing around 0.3 to 0.4 grams of protein per kilogram body mass per meal across three to four meals per day, prioritising high quality protein sources rich in leucine, and paying particular attention to post exercise protein intake; however, much of the underlying evidence comes from older sedentary adults rather than lifelong athletes, and the translation of these mechanistic findings into training performance in master runners remains incompletely validated[34].
Anabolic resistance and the role of lifelong training
Age related anabolic resistance describes the blunted muscle protein synthesis response to protein feeding or exercise that is observed in many older adults relative to younger adults; this phenomenon is associated with reduced muscle mass and function but appears to be influenced strongly by physical inactivity, chronic inflammation, and metabolic disease rather than by chronological age alone[35]. A 2025 narrative review focusing on master athletes highlighted that these individuals usually have better body composition, higher cardiorespiratory fitness, improved insulin sensitivity, and lower systemic inflammation compared with sedentary age matched peers, suggesting that habitual training may substantially attenuate, though not fully abolish, anabolic resistance in this population; nevertheless, studies that directly compare anabolic responses to matched protein doses in younger and older athletes of similar fitness are sparse and represent a key gap in the literature that must be acknowledged when making recommendations[36].
Protein Intake for Older Sedentary People Starting to Run
For older sedentary adults initiating exercise programmes, evidence from tracer studies and training interventions indicates that higher per meal protein intakes, sometimes in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 grams per kilogram body mass, may be necessary to maximise muscle protein synthesis, particularly when daily energy intake is low; these findings support slightly higher protein targets in older sedentary people starting to train compared with younger sedentary individuals, though again most data are from non-athletes and caution is needed when extrapolating to those rapidly increasing their physical activity[37][38].
Cross training in older runners
Cross training activities such as cycling, swimming, and elliptical training can provide cardiovascular stimuli with different mechanical loading characteristics from running; research comparing cross training effects by age in runners of matched fitness is extremely limited, and there is no high quality evidence that cross training is uniquely beneficial or necessary for older runners compared with younger runners when training volume is controlled[39]. Consequently, recommendations for cross training can reasonably be similar across age groups, focusing on its utility for maintaining aerobic conditioning during periods of reduced running load, for adding variety, and for potentially lowering impact forces during recovery from injury or when managing high lifetime mileage.
Until studies specifically test interactions between age, training background, and cross training modalities, statements that older runners should cross train substantially more than younger runners remain speculative and should be flagged as lacking direct empirical support; nevertheless, many coaches and clinicians find that incorporating some low impact aerobic work is pragmatically useful when balancing training load and musculoskeletal recovery in master athletes with long injury histories.
Flexibility, stretching, and running economy
Range of motion requirements for running
Distance running requires adequate range of motion at the hip, knee, and ankle joints, but excessive flexibility beyond functional requirements has sometimes been associated with reduced running economy, particularly when increased joint laxity diminishes elastic energy storage; earlier observational work suggested that stiffer musculotendinous systems may confer energetic advantages for distance running, though much of this evidence comes from small cross sectional studies and should be considered low certainty[40]. More recent systematic reviews and meta analyses of stretching interventions have challenged simplistic assumptions that stretching necessarily harms running economy, indicating that acute stretching of reasonable duration has, on average, trivial effects on running economy, with considerable heterogeneity between studies and individuals[41].
The current evidence therefore supports a pragmatic approach in which runners of all ages aim for sufficient and symmetrical range of motion to perform their running and strength exercises efficiently, without pursuing extreme flexibility that offers no clear performance or injury prevention benefit. (The importance of symmetry can't be understated.) There is no convincing research that lifelong older runners require substantially more stretching than younger runners purely because of age, although stiffness related to arthritis, prior injuries, or sedentary periods may justify targeted mobility work in some individuals[42][43].
Older sedentary adults starting to run
This article is primarily aimed at older adults who have been training for long periods, but I'll give a brief review of older sedentary starting out.
Cardiorespiratory fitness ranges
Sedentary older adults generally have lower V̇O2max values than younger adults, which has implications for starting intensity, progression, and recovery; a large reference study of cardiorespiratory fitness in more than forty thousand adults provided age and sex specific V̇O2max percentiles that are frequently used in clinical and fitness settings.[44] The precise cut points used to define poor, fair, and excellent fitness differ across studies, but typical values for sedentary adults fall in the lower percentiles of these distributions; these reference ranges illustrate the much lower starting point for many older sedentary individuals compared with lifelong athletes.
The table below gives illustrative V̇O2max reference ranges for adults by age and sex based on published meta analyses and large cohort studies; values represent approximate ranges for apparently healthy adults and not specifically lifelong athletes, and different laboratories may use slightly different cut points. Because multiple published charts exist and population cohorts differ, these ranges should be treated as approximate rather than prescriptive and may not fully capture elite or very unfit individuals.
| Age group | Men (approximate range) | Women (approximate range) |
|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | 40–50 for average, ≥55 often considered excellent | 33–43 for average, ≥48 often considered excellent |
| 30–39 | 38–48 for average, ≥52 often considered excellent | 31–41 for average, ≥45 often considered excellent |
| 40–49 | 35–45 for average, ≥48 often considered excellent | 28–38 for average, ≥42 often considered excellent |
| 50–59 | 32–42 for average, ≥45 often considered excellent | 25–35 for average, ≥38 often considered excellent |
| 60–69 | 28–38 for average, ≥40 often considered excellent | 22–32 for average, ≥35 often considered excellent |
| ≥70 | 24–34 for average, ≥36 often considered excellent | 20–30 for average, ≥32 often considered excellent |
These ranges are synthesised from multiple studies and fitness charts rather than a single definitive dataset, so they should be interpreted cautiously and are flagged as approximate; individual assessment by cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides more accurate values for programme design.[45]
General guidance for sedentary older adults
Older sedentary people who wish to start running typically have lower aerobic capacity, reduced muscle mass, lower bone mineral density, impaired balance, and higher prevalence of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases than lifelong athletes; these factors necessitate a more cautious approach to programme design, often starting with walking and low impact activities before introducing structured running intervals.[46] Evidence based recommendations generally include gradual increases in training load, close attention to symptoms such as chest pain, disproportionate breathlessness, or joint pain, and early medical evaluation of individuals with known cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or other significant comorbidities; however, detailed protocols for transitioning from sedentary status to structured running in older adults have not been extensively tested in randomised trials and are often based on expert consensus rather than high certainty evidence.
For sedentary older adults, questions to discuss with a clinician before starting running include: whether a baseline cardiovascular evaluation or stress test is appropriate, how to integrate running with existing medications such as beta blockers or anticoagulants, and whether any musculoskeletal conditions warrant supervised rehabilitation prior to higher impact activities; clinicians can also advise on realistic progression rates and on integrating resistance and balance training to mitigate fall and fracture risk during the transition to higher activity levels.[9]
Practical approaches for older people starting to run
A "couch to 5K" program that starts with walking and gradually adds in running is a good place to start. Many people will have starting fitness levels that allow easy paced exercise to be walking rather than running. Once you can comfortably cover the 5K distance, you can use that to estimate V̇O2max, which in turn can be used in training programs like Jack Daniels or Galloway.
How to train as a lifelong runner with advancing age
Guiding principles
For lifelong runners, the overarching principle is to your base training program on your current fitness, recent and historical injury patterns, and life stress rather than on fixed age based rules. Available evidence in master athletes suggests that those who maintain relatively high intensity and volume, within the constraints of injury risk, experience smaller declines in V̇O2max and performance than those who markedly reduce training, though much of the data are observational and cannot prove causality[47][1]. Many coaches use recent race performances, such as 5K times, to estimate V̇O2max and determine training paces in frameworks similar to established running formula approaches.
Key elements of sustainable training for older runners include: incorporating regular high intensity sessions when health permits, ensuring at least two days per week of progressive resistance training, maintaining an overall training load that changes gradually from week to week, and using subjective and objective indicators such as fatigue, sleep, heart rate variability, and mood to adjust training rather than following rigid plans irrespective of how you feel (just like younger athletes)[9]. Speed work remains valuable for preserving fitness at any age, but older runners might benefit from slightly longer warm ups, fewer all out repetitions, and more conservative progression especially when reintroducing speed after a layoff, reflecting accumulated injury history rather than age alone.
Load management and periodisation
There is no master specific periodisation model validated by randomised controlled trials, but general principles from endurance training science apply; these include structuring training into cycles with varying emphasis on volume and intensity, building towards specific races, and incorporating planned recovery weeks to manage fatigue and reduce injury risk[48]. For older lifelong runners, some observational reports suggest that slightly lower peak volumes, slightly longer recovery between intense sessions, and careful management of back to back hard days may facilitate long term consistency, but these strategies are based largely on coaching experience rather than age specific clinical trials and should be framed as plausible but not definitively proven.
When dealing with persistent or recurrent injuries, older runners may benefit from specialist input from sports medicine clinicians or physiotherapists familiar with master athletes, particularly for decisions about when to modify gait, footwear, or training terrain; since prior injury is a strong risk factor for recurrence, integrating rehabilitation exercises and long term strength and mobility work into the ongoing training plan is likely more effective than treating each injury as an isolated episode, although high quality longitudinal data on such integrative strategies in older runners are limited.
Older female athletes and menopause
As a male runner, my experience in this area is obviously very limited. This section is provided as my understanding of the current research and best practices.
Context and definitions
This section summarises evidence relevant to peri menopause and post menopause in female athletes; it is written from an evidence-based perspective and is intended as a starting point only.
Peri menopause refers to the transitional period leading up to the final menstrual period, characterised by fluctuating estrogen and progesterone levels and variable cycle lengths, whereas post menopause is defined retrospectively after twelve consecutive months without menstrual bleeding not explained by other causes[49]. The average age at natural menopause in many high income countries is around 50 years, with a typical range from the mid 40s to the mid 50s; premature menopause before age 40 and early menopause before age 45 also occur and may carry distinct health implications[50].
Menopause is associated with declines in ovarian production of estrogen and progesterone and, to a lesser extent, testosterone; estradiol levels may fall by roughly ninety percent from reproductive peak to post menopausal levels, progesterone levels decline markedly due to loss of ovulation, and circulating testosterone decreases more gradually from early adulthood, with further reductions in some women following oophorectomy (ovary removal) or certain medications[51][52]. These hormonal shifts influence multiple systems relevant to athletes, including thermoregulation, vascular function, bone turnover, muscle metabolism, and central nervous system function.
Symptoms, diagnosis, and limitations of testing
Common menopausal symptoms include vasomotor symptoms such as hot flushes and night sweats, sleep disturbance, mood changes, urogenital symptoms, and cognitive complaints; in athletes, these can present as impaired sleep quality, increased perceived exertion, reduced recovery, and fluctuating training capacity, though high quality sport specific data remain limited and mostly observational[53][54]. Diagnosis of peri menopause is primarily clinical, based on menstrual pattern and symptoms, and guidelines generally caution against relying on a single measurement of follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, or other hormones to make definitive diagnoses, because levels fluctuate substantially and may not correlate with symptoms at the individual level; emphasis is placed on symptom patterns over time and on excluding alternative explanations such as thyroid disease or hypothalamic amenorrhoea in very lean or highly trained athletes[55].
For athletes, useful questions to discuss with clinicians include: whether menstrual changes are consistent with peri menopause versus relative energy deficiency in sport, how sleep disturbance and vasomotor symptoms are affecting training and recovery, and whether additional assessments such as bone mineral density scanning or iron studies are warranted; there is limited sport specific research validating particular diagnostic pathways in athletes, so current practice often extrapolates from general menopause guidelines and should be presented as such.
Impact of menopause on performance and recovery
Menopausal transition has been associated with declines in muscle strength, power, and physical performance in longitudinal cohorts, even after accounting for age, although the size of these effects varies and may be attenuated by physical activity; for example, a Finnish cohort reported that both early and late peri menopausal women experienced declines in muscle strength and power as they transitioned to post menopause, but physically active women had better absolute performance and less pronounced deterioration than less active peers[56]. Observational reports and small qualitative studies suggest that some endurance athletes experience transient declines in performance, greater variability in training responses, increased injury risk, or altered body composition around menopause, but robust controlled trials directly quantifying these effects in competitive master runners are lacking and this represents an area of weak evidence.
The loss of estrogen is associated with accelerated bone turnover and increased risk of low bone mineral density and fracture, changes in lipid profiles, and altered vascular function, all of which are relevant for long term health and potentially for training tolerance; weight bearing exercise such as running and resistance training can mitigate some of these risks, but do not completely offset them, especially in women with early menopause or additional risk factors[57][58].
Hormone replacement therapy including testosterone
Hormone replacement therapy for menopausal symptoms typically involves estrogen alone in women without a uterus or combined estrogen and progestogen in women with a uterus, to protect the endometrium; transdermal and oral preparations differ in their effects on clotting and lipid profiles, with some evidence that transdermal estrogen has a lower risk of venous thromboembolism than oral formulations, although absolute risks in healthy women in their 50s are generally low in absolute terms[59]. Large trials such as the Women's Health Initiative reported that combined estrogen progestin therapy was associated with an increased relative risk of breast cancer compared with placebo, but the absolute excess risk over about five years was modest, on the order of a few additional cases per thousand women, and subsequent analyses have refined risk estimates by age and time since menopause; estrogen alone in women with prior hysterectomy showed neutral or slightly reduced breast cancer risk in some analyses[60][61].
Testosterone therapy in women is more controversial; some guidelines support low dose transdermal testosterone for women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder, with attention to maintaining serum levels within the physiological female range, but long term safety data are limited and testosterone use is not a routine first line treatment for general menopausal symptoms or for performance enhancement in athlete[62].
Cognitive effects of testosterone in postmenopausal women
The potential for testosterone therapy to improve cognitive function in postmenopausal women has been studied, but evidence remains insufficient and inconsistent. A large randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 200 healthy naturally postmenopausal women (aged 50–65) found that four weeks of testosterone undecanoate (40 mg/day) produced no significant improvement in verbal fluency, verbal memory, or spatial ability compared with placebo or estrogen.[63] Likewise, a 24-week dose-response randomized trial in hysterectomized women with low baseline testosterone showed no improvement in spatial ability, verbal fluency, verbal memory or executive function across a wide range of testosterone doses compared with placebo.[64]
Several smaller pilot or uncontrolled studies have reported more positive results. For example, a 26-week open-label study of transdermal testosterone in postmenopausal women receiving non-oral hormone therapy reported improvements in verbal learning, delayed verbal recall, and visual memory compared with normative data.[65] However, because this was a small, non-randomized, uncontrolled trial, the findings are considered preliminary.
An international Consensus Panel in 2019 concluded that there is "insufficient evidence to support the use of testosterone to enhance cognitive performance, or to delay cognitive decline, in postmenopausal women."[66]
A 2023 systematic review of observational studies examining endogenous testosterone and cognition in postmenopausal women reported inconsistent and inconclusive associations, with most studies showing no clear link between testosterone levels and cognitive performance.[67]
HRT Risks
It is important to stress that hormone replacement therapy, including any use of testosterone, is not risk free or universally indicated; decisions should be made through individualized risk benefit discussions with clinicians experienced in menopause care, taking into account symptom severity, personal and family history of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, and osteoporosis, as well as personal values and performance goals[68]. For athletes, additional questions for clinicians include how hormone therapy may interact with training and recovery, whether transdermal versus oral routes are preferable given clotting risk and endurance training, and how treatment choices align with anti doping regulations for those in tested sport. At the same time, it's vital not to dismiss HRT as a potentially life improving treatment.
Doping limits and competitive considerations
Anti-doping regulations are evolving, and while detailed therapeutic use exemption guidelines often focus on transgender athletes and male hypogonadism, the broad rule is that exogenous testosterone is prohibited for athletes in sports governed by the World Anti Doping Agency, regardless of menopausal status, unless an approved therapeutic use exemption is granted under strict criteria; free and total testosterone concentrations are expected to remain within female reference ranges where therapeutic use is approved, but numeric thresholds vary by sport and are periodically updated, which means athletes should consult current federation and WADA documents rather than relying on static values[69]. For recreational female runners who compete in events that don't do testing, testosterone use still has ethical considerations about fairness.
Women considering hormone replacement therapy, including testosterone, should be advised that this article does not provide medical clearance or personalised recommendations; instead, they should seek advice from menopause literate clinicians, which may include general practitioners, gynaecologists, or specialised clinics including private providers in some countries, while carefully evaluating the credentials of providers and coordinating any treatment with their primary care physician[70].
Nothing left to prove - Motivation changes in older athletes
- It appears common that with many lifelong or recreational athletes shift motivation away from competition toward health maintenance, enjoyment, well-being, identity preservation and psychological benefits.
- Nonetheless, for older athletes with a history of competition and high training volume, competitive or performance-oriented motives may persist.
- Motivation among older athletes is heterogeneous, strongly influenced by personal history, training level, culture, sex and prior competitive background.
- Because of lack of longitudinal data, it remains unclear for many individuals whether their motivation changed over time, or whether observed differences reflect cohort or selection effects. It's even possible that cultural changes have reduced what might be larger, or completely different, shifts in motivation.
What research shows: shifts in motivation with age
Most studies are cross-sectional (comparing different people at different ages) rather than longitudinal (tracking the same individuals over decades)[71]. This makes it hard to separate out changes due to aging and changes due to cultural shifts or other factors.
Research on competitive masters athletes may not represent the broader population of lifelong athletes or former elites. Factors such as prior competitive background, training volume, sex, nationality and culture influence motivation strongly[72].
- From performance / competition to health, well-being and self-esteem. Research among recreational runners, marathoners, and ultramarathoners shows that older participants place greater importance on health orientation and self-esteem, while "personal goal achievement" becomes least important in the oldest age groups[73].
- Greater emphasis on social, enjoyment and belonging for some older athletes. In competitive "masters" track and field athletes (aged 35–89), motives related to health and fitness become more important in older age groups; but those who had prior competitive backgrounds or train more hours still retain competitive/performance motives. [74]
- In older adult recreational runners (50+ years), health and psychological motives dominate. A survey of older amateur runners (age over 50) found that the highest-scoring motivations were general health orientation, weight concern, self-esteem, and psychological coping; by contrast, social motives (e.g. affiliation) and achievement motives (e.g. competition) were among the lowest. [75]
- For many lifelong athletes, psychological, cognitive and social benefits remain key. In older adult swimmers who engage in "masters" swimming late in life, qualitative interviews identified themes such as love for the activity (enjoyment), commitment to friends/community, identity as an athlete, stress reduction and well-being as central motives for continuing. [76]
Possible reasons and solutions for motivational shifts in older athletes
The research doesn't provide a good rationale for the observed changes. I'd like to suggest a number of possible reasons, but these are not evidence based, just my personal musings.
- Older athletes can't compete in open competition, where small differences in performance are critical. Thus, success at the upper edge of elite competition becomes out of reach. In addition to true elite athletes, this can also apply to regional and local athletes. While this change only impacts a small subset of athletes, it might have some downstream cultural impact. As competitive athletes "retire due to age", the culture of competition in older athletes becomes diminished. Hopefully, the rise of age group competition and masters' athletics will mitigate this somewhat.
- The goal to improve on personal best performances becomes out of reach, so the drive to push to improve becomes a drive to reduce decline, something harder to maintain. Focusing on personal best performances within a new age group may mitigate this, or on personal best performances for a time period. (For instance, "a 13 year personal best in the 5K".)
- Age may bring contentment, which in turn reduces the drive to suffer in pursuit of goals. Not everyone becomes happier as they get older, but this crops up in Running On Empty by Marshall Ulrich.
- The self-fulfilling prophecy that "I'm too old to compete", built on a culture that thinks age bring frailty.
- Being older can provide more time for training. Counterintuitively, this can make training much harder. When you're forced to squeeze a workout before work, you have a deadline that gets you moving. When there's too much time, it's easy to procrastinate. (I've seen this personally since retirement.)
- Staleness with a specific goal can occur. Runners can become burned out with the routing of marathon training for instance, or any other distance. Swapping distance goals can provide a fresh perspective. (I've changed from ultrarunning to 5K, and really enjoyed the challenge.)
I don't want to suggest that there's anything wrong with an athlete moving from a competitive focus to a health focus, but I wanted to provide some suggestions for those that might want to regain their drive.
Summary points for lifelong older runners
Key evidence-based themes for lifelong older runners include:
- Performance decline with age is real but modifiable.
- V̇O2max and maximal heart rate reductions are central mechanisms.
- Strength and power training remain beneficial at all ages.
- Injury risk is driven more by training errors and prior injuries than by age alone.
- Protein requirements for highly trained master athletes resemble those of younger athletes with comparable training loads, although sedentary older adults may require higher protein when beginning training.
- Menopause introduces additional complexity for female athletes through hormonal changes that affect multiple body systems; hormone therapy can help some women but entails nuanced risk benefit considerations and regulatory implications, underscoring the need for informed dialogue with clinicians.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 H Tanaka, Endurance exercise performance in Masters athletes, Journal of Physiology, 2007, volume 586, issue 1, pages 55–63, doi 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142747, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2375571/
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 J McKendry, Muscle morphology and performance in master athletes: A systematic review and meta analysis, Ageing Research Reviews, 2018, volume 45, pages 62–82, doi 10.1016/j.arr.2018.04.007, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163718300163
- ↑ H Tanaka, Aging and physiological lessons from master athletes, International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2011, volume 9, pages 67–77, doi 10.5432/ijshs.20100033, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2040-4603.2020.tb00104.x
- ↑ DR Moore, Protein Requirements for Master Athletes: Just Older Versions of Their Younger Selves?, Sports Medicine, 2021, volume 51, issue S1, pages 79–96, doi 10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0
- ↑ G Beis, Age Related Anabolic Resistance: Nutritional and Exercise Strategies to Counteract Muscle Loss in Older Adults and Master Athletes, Nutrients, 2025, volume 17, issue 23, pages 3503, doi 10.3390/nu17223503, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/22/3503
- ↑ E Kemler, Differences in injury risk and characteristics of injuries between novice and experienced runners, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2018, volume 28, issue 10, pages 2201–2209, doi 10.1111/sms.13232, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/457303
- ↑ D Bondarev, Physical Performance During the Menopausal Transition and the Role of Physical Activity, Scientific Reports, 2020, volume 10, issue 1, pages 21128, doi 10.1038/s41598-020-77624-2, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8361353/
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 R Lepers, Master Athletes Are Extending the Limits of Human Endurance, Frontiers in Physiology, 2016, volume 7, pages 500, doi 10.3389/fphys.2016.00500, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5149541/
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 M Piasecki, The Masters Athlete: A Review of Current Exercise and Treatment Considerations, Current Sports Medicine Reports, 2019, volume 18, issue 12, pages 486–494, doi 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000650, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4482301/
- ↑ G Beis, Age Related Anabolic Resistance: Nutritional and Exercise Strategies to Counteract Muscle Loss in Older Adults and Master Athletes, Nutrients, 2025, volume 17, issue 23, pages 3503, doi 10.3390/nu17223503, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/23/3503
- ↑ H Tanaka, Aging and physiological lessons from master athletes, International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2011, volume 9, pages 67–77, doi 10.5432/ijshs.20100033, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2040-4603.2020.tb00104.x
- ↑ R Lepers, Age related declines in endurance performance: insight from master athletes, Sports Medicine, 2013, volume 43, issue 9, pages 853–865, doi 10.1007/s40279-013-0064-x, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-013-0064-x
- ↑ B Knechtle, Performance trends in age group marathoners in the largest marathons of the world, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014, volume 11, issue 2, pages 3639–3665, doi 10.3390/ijerph110403639, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/4/3639
- ↑ https://run.outsideonline.com/road/road-racing/whats-a-good-5k-time-heres-what-the-latest-data-says/
- ↑ GW Heath, Effects of exercise and lack of exercise on the resting and maximal hemodynamic responses of older men, Circulation, 1981, volume 63, issue 1, pages 101–109, doi 10.1161/01.CIR.63.1.101, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.63.1.101
- ↑ TJ Marcell, Age related decline of endurance performance: role of physical activity and muscle characteristics in the master athlete, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2003, volume 95, issue 5, pages 2152–2162, doi 10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2003, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2003
- ↑ H Tanaka, Aging and physiological lessons from master athletes, International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2011, volume 9, pages 67–77, doi 10.5432/ijshs.20100033, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2040-4603.2020.tb00104.x
- ↑ JL Fleg, Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults, Circulation, 2005, volume 112, issue 5, pages 674–682, doi 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.545459
- ↑ H Tanaka, Age related decline in maximal heart rate in healthy humans: a meta analysis, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2001, volume 90, issue 1, pages 1–7, doi 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.1.1, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/jappl.2001.90.1.1
- ↑ RA Robergs, Failure of the "220 – age" equation to predict maximal heart rate in healthy adult cardiorespiratory fitness participants, Journal of Exercise Physiology, 2002, volume 5, issue 2, pages 1–10, https://www.asep.org/asep/asep/Robergs2.pdf
- ↑ DA Massini, The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta analysis, Sports Medicine Open, 2022, volume 8, issue 1, pages 99, doi 10.1186/s40798-022-00456-5, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35742181/
- ↑ AP Bacon, Effect of strength training on running economy in distance runners: a systematic review, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2013, volume 27, issue 8, pages 2194–2202, doi 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827e146f, https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Abstract/2013/08000/Effect_of_Strength_Training_on_Running_Economy_in.36.aspx
- ↑ MD Peterson, Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta analysis, Ageing Research Reviews, 2010, volume 9, issue 3, pages 226–237, doi 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568163710000308
- ↑ MS Fragala, Resistance Training for Older Adults: Position Statement From the National Strength and Conditioning Association, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2019, volume 33, issue 8, pages 2019–2052, doi 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003230, https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2019/08000/Resistance_Training_for_Older_Adults__Position.32.aspx
- ↑ DA Massini, The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta analysis, Sports Medicine Open, 2022, volume 8, issue 1, pages 99, doi 10.1186/s40798-022-00456-5, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35742181/
- ↑ EL Cadore, Exercise interventions to improve muscle and physical function in older adults: a narrative review, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2013, volume 17, issue 2, pages 197–205, doi 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000064, https://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/a/3HL8X9FY3U3DL5EMFQCTS96/
- ↑ RN van Gent, Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007, volume 41, issue 8, pages 469–480, doi 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033548, https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/41/8/469
- ↑ E Kemler, Differences in injury risk and characteristics of injuries between novice and experienced runners, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2018, volume 28, issue 10, pages 2201–2209, doi 10.1111/sms.13232, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/457303
- ↑ ML Bertelsen, A framework for the etiology of running related injuries, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2017, volume 27, issue 11, pages 1170–1180, doi 10.1111/sms.12883, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sms.12883
- ↑ DW Jenkins, Biomechanics and Ageing in Endurance Running, Sports Medicine, 2015, volume 45, issue 5, pages 641–655, PMC4637924 !!pmcid!!, doi 10.1007/s40279-015-0319-2, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4637924/
- ↑ ML Bertelsen, A framework for the etiology of running related injuries, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 2017, volume 27, issue 11, pages 1170–1180, doi 10.1111/sms.12883, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sms.12883
- ↑ DT Thomas, Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2016, volume 116, issue 3, pages 501–528, doi 10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.006, https://jandonline.org/article/S2212-2672(15)01802-X/fulltext
- ↑ DR Moore, Protein Requirements for Master Athletes: Just Older Versions of Their Younger Selves?, Sports Medicine, 2021, volume 51, issue S1, pages 79–96, doi 10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0
- ↑ DR Moore, Protein Requirements for Master Athletes: Just Older Versions of Their Younger Selves?, Sports Medicine, 2021, volume 51, issue S1, pages 79–96, doi 10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-021-01510-0
- ↑ G Beis, Age Related Anabolic Resistance: Nutritional and Exercise Strategies to Counteract Muscle Loss in Older Adults and Master Athletes, Nutrients, 2025, volume 17, issue 23, pages 3503, doi 10.3390/nu17223503, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/23/3503
- ↑ G Beis, Age Related Anabolic Resistance: Nutritional and Exercise Strategies to Counteract Muscle Loss in Older Adults and Master Athletes, Nutrients, 2025, volume 17, issue 23, pages 3503, doi 10.3390/nu17223503, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/23/3503
- ↑ RW Morton, Protein intake to maximize whole body anabolism during post exercise recovery in resistance trained men with high habitual intakes is several fold greater than the current recommended dietary allowance, Journal of Nutrition, 2015, volume 145, issue 12, pages 2446–2452, doi 10.3945/jn.115.214221, https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/145/12/2446/4585700
- ↑ SM Phillips, Nutritional strategies to support muscle hypertrophy across the lifespan, Sports Medicine, 2016, volume 46, issue S1, pages 119–130, doi 10.1007/s40279-016-0376-x, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-016-0376-x
- ↑ AS Tenforde, Overuse injuries in runners, Current Sports Medicine Reports, 2012, volume 11, issue 3, pages 160–168, doi 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3182596f3e, https://journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/Fulltext/2012/05000/Overuse_Injuries_in_Runners.7.aspx
- ↑ PU Saunders, Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners, Sports Medicine, 2004, volume 34, issue 7, pages 465–485, doi 10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005, https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005
- ↑ K Warneke, Acute and Chronic Effects of Stretching on Running Economy: A Systematic Review and Meta analysis, Sports Medicine, 2025, volume 55, issue 8, pages 761–781, doi 10.1007/s40279-025-02011-3, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40442558/
- ↑ A Konrad, The impact of a single stretching session on running performance and running economy: a systematic review, Frontiers in Physiology, 2021, volume 11, pages 610992, doi 10.3389/fphys.2020.610992, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.610992/full
- ↑ K Warneke, Practical recommendations on stretching exercise, Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2025, volume 14, issue 4, pages 567–578, doi 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.02.004, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254625000468
- ↑ LA Kaminsky, Cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular disease risk: the FIT Project, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2015, volume 90, issue 12, pages 1515–1524, doi 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.09.006, https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(15)00788-1/fulltext
- ↑ LA Kaminsky, Historical and current perspectives on cardiorespiratory fitness and health: future directions, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2019, volume 62, issue 2, pages 86–93, doi 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.03.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062018301450
- ↑ KL Piercy, The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, JAMA, 2018, volume 320, issue 19, pages 2020–2028, doi 10.1001/jama.2018.14854, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2712935
- ↑ TJ Marcell, Age related decline of endurance performance: role of physical activity and muscle characteristics in the master athlete, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2003, volume 95, issue 5, pages 2152–2162, doi 10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2003, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00253.2003
- ↑ S Seiler, What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes?, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2010, volume 5, issue 3, pages 276–291, doi 10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276, https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijspp/5/3/article-p276.xml
- ↑ SD Harlow, Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop plus ten: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging, Menopause, 2012, volume 19, issue 4, pages 387–395, doi 10.1097/gme.0b013e31824d8f40, https://journals.lww.com/menopausejournal/Fulltext/2012/04000/Executive_summary_of_the_Stages_of_Reproductive.3.aspx
- ↑ EB Gold, The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2011, volume 38, issue 3, pages 425–440, doi 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889854511000382
- ↑ JF Randolph, Change in serum estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone across the menopausal transition, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2011, volume 96, issue 3, pages 859–867, doi 10.1210/jc.2010.2046, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/96/3/859/2833884
- ↑ SL Davison, Androgen levels in adult females: changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2005, volume 90, issue 7, pages 3847–3853, doi 10.1210/jc.2005-0212, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/90/7/3847/2836623
- ↑ N Santoro, Perimenopause: from research to practice, Journal of Women's Health, 2016, volume 25, issue 4, pages 332–339, doi 10.1089/jwh.2015.5556, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2015.5556
- ↑ KJ Elliott Sale, The effects of oral contraceptives, menstrual cycle phase, and menopause on exercise performance in female athletes: a systematic review and meta analysis, Sports Medicine, 2020, volume 50, issue 6, pages 1013–1029, doi 10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z
- ↑ N Santoro, Perimenopause: from research to practice, Journal of Women's Health, 2016, volume 25, issue 4, pages 332–339, doi 10.1089/jwh.2015.5556, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2015.5556
- ↑ D Bondarev, Physical Performance During the Menopausal Transition and the Role of Physical Activity, Scientific Reports, 2020, volume 10, issue 1, pages 21128, doi 10.1038/s41598-020-77624-2, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8361353/
- ↑ GA Greendale, Bone loss in the menopausal transition: by how much and when, Journal of Women's Health, 2012, volume 21, issue 10, pages 1043–1049, doi 10.1089/jwh.2011.3385, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2011.3385
- ↑ B Ettinger, Effects of ultra endurance exercise on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1997, volume 29, issue 11, pages 1400–1405, doi 10.1097/00005768-199711000-00006, https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/1997/11000/Effects_of_ultraendurance_exercise_on_bone_mineral.13.aspx
- ↑ CA Stuenkel, Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2015, volume 100, issue 11, pages 3975–4011, doi 10.1210/jc.2015-2236, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/100/11/3975/2836060
- ↑ RT Chlebowski, Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women, New England Journal of Medicine, 2009, volume 360, issue 6, pages 573–587, doi 10.1056/NEJMoa0807684, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0807684
- ↑ GL Anderson, Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 2004, volume 291, issue 14, pages 1701–1712, doi 10.1001/jama.291.14.1701, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/198433
- ↑ RM Islam, Safety and efficacy of testosterone for women: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomised controlled trial data, Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2019, volume 7, issue 10, pages 754–766, doi 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30189-5, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(19)30189-5/fulltext
- ↑ L Kocoska-Maras, Testosterone and cognitive function in naturally postmenopausal women, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2011, volume 36, issue 7, pages 1027–1038, PMID 20667535
- ↑ G Huang, Effects of testosterone administration on cognitive function in hysterectomized women with low testosterone levels: a randomized trial, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2015, volume 100, issue 11, pages 3965–3974, PMC4716804 !!pmc!!
- ↑ S L Davison, The cognitive effects of testosterone in postmenopausal women, Maturitas, 2011, volume 70, issue 1, pages 73–78, PMID 21930354
- ↑ S R Davis, Global consensus position statement on the use of testosterone therapy for women, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2019, volume 104, issue 10, pages 4660–4666, PMC6821450 !!pmc!!
- ↑ R Sultana, Endogenous testosterone and cognition in postmenopausal women: a systematic review, Climacteric, 2023, PMID 36366914
- ↑ CA Stuenkel, Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2015, volume 100, issue 11, pages 3975–4011, doi 10.1210/jc.2015-2236, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/100/11/3975/2836060
- ↑ TUE Physician Guidelines: Transgender Athletes, https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/tuec_transgender_version1.0.pdf, World Anti Doping Agency !!website!!, 2025-12-04 !!access-date!!
- ↑ CA Stuenkel, Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2015, volume 100, issue 11, pages 3975–4011, doi 10.1210/jc.2015-2236, https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/100/11/3975/2836060
- ↑ Titta K. Kontro, Dmitriy Bondarev, Kukka-Maaria Pyykönen, Mikaela von Bonsdorff, Lauri Laakso, Harri Suominen, Marko T. Korhonen, Motives for competitive sports participation in masters track and field athletes: Impact of sociodemographic factors and competitive background, PLOS ONE, volume 17, issue 11, 2022, pages e0275900, doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0275900
- ↑ Titta K. Kontro, Dmitriy Bondarev, Kukka-Maaria Pyykönen, Mikaela von Bonsdorff, Lauri Laakso, Harri Suominen, Marko T. Korhonen, Motives for competitive sports participation in masters track and field athletes: Impact of sociodemographic factors and competitive background, PLOS ONE, volume 17, issue 11, 2022, pages e0275900, doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0275900
- ↑ Dagmara Gerasimuk, Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, Arkadiusz Stanula, Eduard Bezuglov, Evgenij Achkasov, Andrzej Swinarew, Zbigniew Waśkiewicz, Age-Related Differences in Motivation of Recreational Runners, Marathoners, and Ultra-Marathoners, Frontiers in Psychology, volume 12, 2021, pages 738807, doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738807
- ↑ Titta K. Kontro, Dmitriy Bondarev, Kukka-Maaria Pyykönen, Mikaela von Bonsdorff, Lauri Laakso, Harri Suominen, Marko T. Korhonen, Motives for competitive sports participation in masters track and field athletes: Impact of sociodemographic factors and competitive background, PLOS ONE, volume 17, issue 11, 2022, pages e0275900, doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0275900
- ↑ Patxi León-Guereño, Héctor Galindo-Domínguez, Eneko Balerdi-Eizmendi, Mateusz Rozmiarek, Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, Motivation behind running among older adult runners, BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, volume 13, 2021, pages 138, doi 10.1186/s13102-021-00366-1
- ↑ Bradley W. Young, Physical Activity and Aging: Exploring Motivations of Masters Swimmers, Innovation in Aging, volume 5, 1 !!supplement!!, 2021, pages 781