Shoes-table

Revision as of 06:20, 18 November 2014 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)

Revision as of 06:20, 18 November 2014 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)

Full Review Rating Weight

(oz)

Penalty
sec/mile
Penalty
sec/Km
Drop

(mm)

Forefoot

Thickness

Heel

Thickness

Cushioning Flexibility

Notes

Hoka Clifton Review 5 8.5 9.9 6.2 4 28 32 8 4 Top pick. A lighter weight version of the Hoka Bondi.
Altra Olympus Review 4 11.8 15.1 9.4 0 36 36 8 4.5 An evolution of the Hoka design: Thick & softly cushioned, but better shape.
Altra Paradigm Review 3 10.2 12.6 7.8 0 25 25 6 4 Similar to the olympus but not quite as good
Hoka Bondi Review 3 13 16.9 10.5 5 30 35 8 4 A great Hoka, but the Clifton is better.
Hoka Mafate Review 3 13.6 17.9 11.1 6 35 41 9 1 The heaviest, thickest and most cushioned of the Hokas.
Hoka Stinson Review 3 13.2 17.3 10.7 6 32 38 9 2 A little heavier and thicker than the Bondi/Clifton.
Altra One2 5 7.3 8.1 5.0 0 19 19 5 8.5 Soft cushioning and lightweight.
Mizuno Cursoris Review 5 6.8 7.3 4.5 0 18 18 5 8 Soft, light & comfortable. Still available, but discontinued
Saucony Virrata 2 Review 4 7.3 8.1 5.0 0 17 17 2 8 A light weight, zero drop shoe.
Skechers GO Bionic Review 4 6.2 6.4 3.9 0 10 10 2 8 Highly flexible, zero drop, but firm. Great value.
Adidas Takumi Sen 2 Review 3 6.9 7.4 4.6 5 17 22 1 6 An unusual Japanese racing shoe
Nike Free Review 3 7.1 7.8 4.8 4 17 21 2 8
Modified Nike Free 3 5 4.5 2.8 0 17 17 1 8
Saucony Kinvara 5 Review 2 7.9 9.0 5.6 6 18 24 5 7 An evolution towards a minimalist design. (More drop than advertised.)
Altra Torin Review 3 9 10.7 6.7 0 20 20 2 7
Brooks PureCadence 3 Review 3 9.4 11.3 7.0 5 18 23 4 7 A good level of cushioning, but firm & needs to be lighter.
Saucony Hattori 3 4.4 11.8 7.3 0 15 15 0.5 9 Very light, with minimal cushioning. No laces unless you get the LC version.
Adidas Energy Boost 2 Review 3 10 12.3 7.6 7 14 21 6 6 A new type of foam produces a better shoe than you'd expect. Figures are without insole.
Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review 3 3.2 18.2 11.3 2 11 13 0 9 A radically light weight racing shoe.
Merrell Trail Glove 3 7 24.1 15.0 0 10 10 0 7 I prefer the trail glove, even on asphalt
Hoka Rapa Nui 2 Tarmac 0 10.7 13.4 8.3 4 26 30 2 4 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
Hoka Conquest Review 0 11.9 15.2 9.5 6 28 34 2 3 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
Hoka Huaka Review 0 9.9 12.1 7.5 5 21 26 4 6 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
New Balance Fresh Foam 980 0 9.1 10.9 6.8 4 21 25 2 6 Less of a drop than a traditional running shoe, but too firm.
Brooks Transcend 0 11.8 15.1 9.4 8 22 30 3 6 Brooks claim it is "the Ultimate Plush Ride", but it's not much thicker and it's overly firm.
Skechers GOrun Ultra Review 1 9.8 12.0 7.4 14 26 40 8 7 Tries to be a $80 Hoka, but fails. (Without insole the midsole is 24/34mm
Patagonia EVERlong Review 0 9.2 11.0 6.8 11 16 27 4 6 More drop than the claimed 4mm, but no other flaws. However, other shoes do it better.
Asics GT 2000 0 10.9 13.7 8.5 9 20 29 4 6 A shoe that almost defines 'traditional', included for comparison
  • Weight. The weight of a shoe makes a big difference in the energy cost of running. Even small changes in weight can make a big difference in how fast we run. The weight in parenthesis is my measurement, which is size 9.5-11.0 depending on the shoe. This helps compensate for shoes that claim to be lighter by making their shoes small for any given size.
  • Performance Penalty. Most studies show that for each 3.5oz/100g of shoe weight performance drops by 1%. However, there is also good evidence that cushioning can improve performance, so some allowance is made for the padding. The figures here are based on 4 hour marathon pace, which is 9:09 min/mile or 5:41 min/Km pace.
  • 'Drop & Sole thickness'. The drop is difference in sole thickness between the forefoot and heel. Larger drops can interfere with natural running form, and may increase the probability of heel strike.