Difference between revisions of "Maximalist"

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
m (comment: batch update)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Minimax - Minimum Drop, Maximum Cushioning Shoes (Hoka, Altra, etc.)}}
+
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Maximalist  Shoes}}
−
Shoes in the Minimax style have thick, soft soles with far less height difference between the front and back of the shoe (drop). This category of shoes was started by [[Hoka Shoe Review|Hoka]] and followed by several others. Only the [[Altra Olympus]] (and to a lesser extent the [[Altra Paradigm]]) matches the Hokas for their oversized soles made of extra soft foam. There are a number of other shoes that come close, and I've put them under the 'Minimax Transitional' category.  
+
Maximalist shoes typically have far more cushioning than a traditional running shoe, as well as typically having far less height difference between the front and back of the sole (the drop). This category of shoes was started by [[Hoka Shoe Review|Hoka]] and followed by several others, especially Altra. The early maximalist shoes started off with sole thicknesses of 40-45mm, and they used much softer foam to create a unique style. These issues often appear to have a much thicker sole than they actually possess, as of the midsole tends to wrap around the heel creating the illusion that it's actually 10 to 15 mm thicker. As of this category has matured, the lines have tended to blur as less extreme shoes become part of the maximalist range. Traditional shoe companies have sometimes attempted to mimic this maximalist approach, but often fail to use soft enough foam resulting in an overly large and cumbersome shoe.
−
* The best shoe in this category is the [[Altra Olympus]], capturing the best of the Hoka approach and improving on it.
+
=The Pros and Cons of Maximalist Shoes=
−
* The [[Hoka Bondi]] has greater cushioning and protection, but is heaver and pricy.
+
When runners of first to try on a maximalist shoe they are often surprised by the comfort and softness of the ride. This initial comfort is extremely appealing, but there are a number of caveats that you should be aware of:
−
* Skechers has made a valiant attempt with their [[Skechers GOrun Ultra]], producing a Hoka like shoe for less than half the price. Its major problem is the drop, as the heel is much higher than the forefoot.
+
# [[The Science of Running Shoes]] indicates that a maximalist shoe probably doesn't reduce impact over a shoe with little or no cushioning. There is even some evidence that a massively cushioned shoe might even increase impact forces. This is counterintuitive, but might be due to the way a runners mind and body adapts to softer cushioning. To complicate matters, the relationship between injury and impact is unclear at best, possibly because there are various ways of measuring the impact.
−
* [[Adidas Energy Boost]]. This is built like a traditional shoe, but the new midsole material makes it seem much better cushioned that you'd expect.  
+
# A little bit of cushioning can improve your [[Running Economy]], but further increases in cushioning don't produce any benefit.
−
* The [[Mizuno Cursoris]] is soft, light and seems faster than most other shoes in this category, but has less protection and longevity.  
+
# The thickness of the sole can create a platform like effect that increases the likelihood of twisting and ankle. Many maximalist shoes attempt to compensate for this problem by having a midsole that spreads out wider than the foot. Unfortunately this can create a "snowshoe effect" so that runners who land on the outside edge of the foot a subject to greater twisting forces.
−
* The [[Altra Torin]] is zero drop, and has more cushioning than a minimalist shoe, but the foam is quite firm.
+
=Why Buy a Maximalist Shoe?=
−
* The [[Saucony Virrata]] is nearly as good as the Torin, but cheaper.  
+
Given the downsides of maximalist shoes, the obvious and reasonable question becomes "why would anybody buy one?"
−
* New Balance Fresh Foam 980 has less of a drop than a traditional shoe, but it's too firm to be considered a Minimax shoe.
+
* '''Comfort'''. The initial comfort of a maximalist shoe is hard to deny, but my experience over many miles of running is that your mind and body adapt to the cushioning so that after a few miles the relative comfort is a surprisingly similar.
 +
* '''Injury prevention'''. If you're worried about an injury and are trying to reduce the impact of running, then I'd urge you to be cautious before adopting a maximalist shoe. While the initial comfort of a maximalist shoe is greater than the initial comfort of something a little thinner, I don't believe that this difference lasts for more than a mile or two. Running barefoot or in a truly minimalist shoe like the [[Merrell Vapor Glove]] can be difficult to adapt to, but once you have a modest amount of cushioning you have reasonable comfort. I find the difference between a modestly cushioned shoe like the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]] and a maximalist Hoka to be quite small after I've got use to each. The level of impact on your body may actually be higher in the maximalist shoe.
 +
* '''Ultrarunning'''. Many ultrarunners prefer a maximalist shoe, and I found that my body appreciates the extra cushioning as of the miles build up. My first Ultra in a Hoka was the [[2012 Hinson Lake 24 Hour]] where I ran 50 miles in Nike Frees, then another 73 miles in the Hokas. I swapped at the 50 mile mark because of my feet will be coming "footsore" and the Hokas really reduced the pain. Since then I've mostly run ultramarathons in a maximalist shoe, and I found that my feet generally do much better.

Latest revision as of 06:09, 14 December 2016

Maximalist shoes typically have far more cushioning than a traditional running shoe, as well as typically having far less height difference between the front and back of the sole (the drop). This category of shoes was started by Hoka and followed by several others, especially Altra. The early maximalist shoes started off with sole thicknesses of 40-45mm, and they used much softer foam to create a unique style. These issues often appear to have a much thicker sole than they actually possess, as of the midsole tends to wrap around the heel creating the illusion that it's actually 10 to 15 mm thicker. As of this category has matured, the lines have tended to blur as less extreme shoes become part of the maximalist range. Traditional shoe companies have sometimes attempted to mimic this maximalist approach, but often fail to use soft enough foam resulting in an overly large and cumbersome shoe.

1 The Pros and Cons of Maximalist Shoes

When runners of first to try on a maximalist shoe they are often surprised by the comfort and softness of the ride. This initial comfort is extremely appealing, but there are a number of caveats that you should be aware of:

  1. The Science of Running Shoes indicates that a maximalist shoe probably doesn't reduce impact over a shoe with little or no cushioning. There is even some evidence that a massively cushioned shoe might even increase impact forces. This is counterintuitive, but might be due to the way a runners mind and body adapts to softer cushioning. To complicate matters, the relationship between injury and impact is unclear at best, possibly because there are various ways of measuring the impact.
  2. A little bit of cushioning can improve your Running Economy, but further increases in cushioning don't produce any benefit.
  3. The thickness of the sole can create a platform like effect that increases the likelihood of twisting and ankle. Many maximalist shoes attempt to compensate for this problem by having a midsole that spreads out wider than the foot. Unfortunately this can create a "snowshoe effect" so that runners who land on the outside edge of the foot a subject to greater twisting forces.

2 Why Buy a Maximalist Shoe?

Given the downsides of maximalist shoes, the obvious and reasonable question becomes "why would anybody buy one?"

  • Comfort. The initial comfort of a maximalist shoe is hard to deny, but my experience over many miles of running is that your mind and body adapt to the cushioning so that after a few miles the relative comfort is a surprisingly similar.
  • Injury prevention. If you're worried about an injury and are trying to reduce the impact of running, then I'd urge you to be cautious before adopting a maximalist shoe. While the initial comfort of a maximalist shoe is greater than the initial comfort of something a little thinner, I don't believe that this difference lasts for more than a mile or two. Running barefoot or in a truly minimalist shoe like the Merrell Vapor Glove can be difficult to adapt to, but once you have a modest amount of cushioning you have reasonable comfort. I find the difference between a modestly cushioned shoe like the Asics Gel Hyper Speed and a maximalist Hoka to be quite small after I've got use to each. The level of impact on your body may actually be higher in the maximalist shoe.
  • Ultrarunning. Many ultrarunners prefer a maximalist shoe, and I found that my body appreciates the extra cushioning as of the miles build up. My first Ultra in a Hoka was the 2012 Hinson Lake 24 Hour where I ran 50 miles in Nike Frees, then another 73 miles in the Hokas. I swapped at the 50 mile mark because of my feet will be coming "footsore" and the Hokas really reduced the pain. Since then I've mostly run ultramarathons in a maximalist shoe, and I found that my feet generally do much better.
Retrieved from "http://fellrnr.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Maximalist&oldid=10354"