Changes

Here is an overview of the major ingredients in gels (see [[The Science of Energy Gels| The Science of Energy Gels]]for more details). It's worth noting the controversy over Spring Energy Gels not containing the claimed ingredients, with the provided energy only about a third of what was claimed. Hopefully this is an outlier, but it's hard to be sure what's actually in these products.

Maurten claims that their hydrogel formula causes less digestive distress and is more easily absorbed than without the hydrogel. There's one study that backs this up, and another that didn't find any difference. My concern is that this gel is simple sugars, glucose, and fructose, which are harder to absorb than maltodextrin. So , this seems to be an overly expensive, complex solution given that maltodextrin is cheaper and easier. On the other hand, if you struggle with digestive issues from maltodextrin based gels, this might be worth a try. (Personally, I found the jelly texture of the Maurten quite off putting, and it's the only gel I've ever thrown away without finishing. The idea is that the jelly doesn't need to be mixed with saliva, but swallowed as a lump where it passes through the stomach to be absorbed more slowly further down the digestive tract.)

==Spring Energy Gel(Controversial) ==This gel claims it is mixture of real foods, with higher energy density than a carbohydrate gel. It provides 250 calories 's gained a lot of attention in just 52gthe ultrarunning community, way more than a carbohydrate gel canbut concerns have been raised that the actual ingredients don't match the claims. Of the 250 caloriesAs of May 2024, 170 are from fatSpring issued an apology, but only after the running community paid for a third party analysis of the nutrition in Spring Energy gels and it has some fiber and proteinfound a wild difference. ItJason Koops's not what you want for high intensity races; I'd say anything up third party analysis that showed only 139 calories per 100g, working out to 5 hours/marathon distance you probably want to stick to a carbohydrate gelabout 72 calories per packet, with no fat. But (Google "Jason Koops Spring Energy Reddit" for longer, slower events (or trainingmore information.), I think this gel is a great option.

Unlike energy gels, [http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=PocketFuel&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3APocketFuel PocketFuel]is a peanut butter like paste in an energy gel like packet. They are similar a little larger than most other gels (about 1.8oz/52g) but have far more calories (~280) due to their higher fat content. Be careful of the nutrition label, which quotes values for a 32 gram serving, even though the packet contains 52g. The label says each packet contains "about 2" servings, but is actually 1.6 servings. I've added a table below of the nutrition from an entire packet. I would not generally recommend PocketFuel for runs shorter than about 40 miles, but for longer races they make a convenient form of food. As you can see from the table below, there is a mix of fat and carbohydrate that I think is excellent for ultrarunning. I'm also really happy to see 5 g of fiber, something you might really, really appreciate the day after an ultramarathon! It's a shame there's not a little more salt, but that's my only quibble with the nutrition. Note that for some flavors the ingredients tend to settle and it's worth squishing the packet before your you run to mix things up.