Shoes-table

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Revision as of 14:33, 9 November 2014 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Category Shoe Full Review Weight (oz) Penalty
sec/mile
Penalty
sec/Km
Drop (mm) Forefoot

Thickness

Heel

Thickness

Cushioning Flexibility

Notes

Minimax Hoka Clifton Hoka Clifton Review 8.5 9.9 6.2 6 23 29 8 7 Top pick. A lighter weight version of the Hoka Bondi.
Minimax Altra Olympus Altra Olympus Review 11.8 15.1 9.4 0 36 36 8 4.5 Top pick. An evolution of the [Hoka One One]] design: Thick, softly cushioned midsole, but better.
Minimax Altra Paradigm Altra Paradigm Review 10.2 12.6 7.8 0 25 25 6 4 Similar to the olympus but not quite as good
Minimax Hoka Bondi Hoka Bondi Review 13 16.9 10.5 5 30 35 8 4 A great Hoka, but the Clifton is better.
Minimax Hoka Mafate Hoka Mafate Review 13.6 17.9 11.1 6 35 41 9 1 The heaviest, thickest and most cushioned of the Hokas.
Minimax Hoka Stinson Hoka Stinson Review 13.2 17.3 10.7 6 32 38 9 2 The Stinson is a little heavier and thicker than the Bondi/Clifton.
Optimal Altra One2 Altra One2 7.3 8.1 5.0 0 19 19 5 8.5 Top pick. Soft cushioning and lightweight.
Optimal Mizuno Cursoris Mizuno Cursoris Review 6.8 7.3 4.5 0 18 18 5 8 Soft, light and comfortable. Still available, but discontinued
Optimal Saucony Virrata Saucony Virrata 2 Review 7.3 8.1 5.0 0 17 17 2 8 Top pick. A light weight, zero drop shoe.
Optimal Skechers GO Bionic Skechers GO Bionic Review 6.2 6.4 3.9 0 10 10 2 8 Top pick. Highly flexible, zero drop, but firm. Great value for money.
Optimal Adidas Takumi Sen 2 Adidas Takumi Sen 2 Review 6.9 7.4 4.6 5 17 22 1 6 An unusual Japanese racing shoe
Optimal Nike Free 3.0 Flyknit Nike Free Review 7.1 7.8 4.8 4 17 21 2 8
Optimal Modified Nike Free Modified Nike Free 5 4.5 2.8 0 17 17 1
Optimal Saucony Kinvara Saucony Kinvara 5 Review 7.9 9.0 5.6 8 22 30 5 7 An evolution towards a minimalist design, but it has more drop than the 4mm that Saucony claim.
Optimal Altra Torin Altra Torin Review 9 10.7 6.7 0 20 20 2 7
Optimal Brooks PureCadence Brooks PureCadence 3 Review 9.4 11.3 7.0 5 17 22 4 7 A good level of cushioning, but it needs to be lighter.
Optimal Saucony Hattori 4.4 11.8 7.3 0 15 15 0.5 9 Very light, with minimal cushioning. No laces unless you get the LC version.
Optimal Adidas Energy Boost Adidas Energy Boost 2 Review 10 12.3 7.6 7 14 21 6 6 A new type of foam produces a better shoe than you'd expect. Figures are without insole.
Minimal Mizuno Wave Universe Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review 3.2 18.2 11.3 2 11 13 0 9 A radically light weight racing shoe.
Minimal NB Trail Minimus 6.5 23.3 14.5 5 10 15 0
Minimal NB Road Minimus 6.2 22.8 14.2 0 11 11 0
Minimal Merrell Trail Glove 7 24.1 15.0 0 10 10 0
Minimal Merrell Road Glove 6.9 23.9 14.9 0 11 11 0
Minimal Vibram FiveFingers 4 19.4 12.1 0 5 5 0
Minimal Vivobarefoot One 7 24.1 15.0 0 3 3 0
Not Recommended Hoka Rapa Nui 2 Tarmac 10.7 13.4 8.3 4 26 30 2 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
Not Recommended Hoka Conquest Hoka Conquest Review 11.9 15.2 9.5 4 28 34 2 3 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
Not Recommended Hoka Huaka Hoka Huaka Review 9.9 12.1 7.5 5 21 26 4 6 Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm.
Not Recommended New Balance Fresh Foam 980 9.1 10.9 6.8 4 21 25 2 Less of a drop than a traditional running shoe, but too firm.
Not Recommended Brooks Transcend 11.8 15.1 9.4 8 22 30 4 Brooks claim it is "the Ultimate Plush Ride", but it's not much thicker and it's overly firm.
Not Recommended Skechers GOrun Ultra Skechers GOrun Ultra Review 9.8 12.0 7.4 14 26 40 8 7 Tries to be a $80 Hoka, but fails. (Without insole the midsole is 24/34mm
Not Recommended Patagonia EVERlong Patagonia EVERlong Review 9.2 11.0 6.8 9 16 27 4 6 More drop than the claimed 4mm, but no other flaws. However, other shoes do it better.
Not Recommended Asics GT 2000 10.9 13.7 8.5 9 20 29 A shoe that almost defines 'traditional', included for comparison
  • Cushioning. Shoes vary in the mount of cushioning they provide. There is reasonable scientific evidence that higher levels of cushioning increase stresses on joints and have higher rates of injury. However, cushioning is also one way shoes provide protection from stones (the other is inflexibility). Cushioning can also reduce foot soreness on longer ultramarathons.
  • Weight. The weight of a shoe makes a big difference in the energy cost of running. Even small changes in weight can make a big difference in how fast we run. The weight in parenthesis is my measurement, which is size 9.5-11.0 depending on the shoe. This helps compensate for shoes that claim to be lighter by making their shoes small for any given size.
  • Performance Penalty. Most studies show that for each 3.5oz/100g of shoe weight performance drops by 1%. However, there is also good evidence that cushioning can improve performance, so some allowance is made for the padding. The figures here are based on 4 hour marathon pace, which is 9:09 min/mile or 5:41 min/Km pace.
  • Drop & Sole thickness. The drop is difference in sole thickness between the forefoot and heel. Larger drops can interfere with natural running form, and may increase the probability of heel strike. Numbers in parenthesis are without the insole.