Shoes-table
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Revision as of 13:33, 9 November 2014 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
Category | Shoe | Full Review | Weight (oz) | Penalty sec/mile |
Penalty sec/Km |
Drop (mm) | Forefoot Thickness |
Heel Thickness |
Cushioning | Flexibility |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimax | Hoka Clifton | Hoka Clifton Review | 8.5 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 6 | 23 | 29 | 8 | 7 | Top pick. A lighter weight version of the Hoka Bondi. |
Minimax | Altra Olympus | Altra Olympus Review | 11.8 | 15.1 | 9.4 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 8 | 4.5 | Top pick. An evolution of the [Hoka One One]] design: Thick, softly cushioned midsole, but better. |
Minimax | Altra Paradigm | Altra Paradigm Review | 10.2 | 12.6 | 7.8 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 6 | 4 | Similar to the olympus but not quite as good |
Minimax | Hoka Bondi | Hoka Bondi Review | 13 | 16.9 | 10.5 | 5 | 30 | 35 | 8 | 4 | A great Hoka, but the Clifton is better. |
Minimax | Hoka Mafate | Hoka Mafate Review | 13.6 | 17.9 | 11.1 | 6 | 35 | 41 | 9 | 1 | The heaviest, thickest and most cushioned of the Hokas. |
Minimax | Hoka Stinson | Hoka Stinson Review | 13.2 | 17.3 | 10.7 | 6 | 32 | 38 | 9 | 2 | The Stinson is a little heavier and thicker than the Bondi/Clifton. |
Optimal | Altra One2 | Altra One2 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 5.0 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 8.5 | Top pick. Soft cushioning and lightweight. |
Optimal | Mizuno Cursoris | Mizuno Cursoris Review | 6.8 | 7.3 | 4.5 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 5 | 8 | Soft, light and comfortable. Still available, but discontinued |
Optimal | Saucony Virrata | Saucony Virrata 2 Review | 7.3 | 8.1 | 5.0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 8 | Top pick. A light weight, zero drop shoe. |
Optimal | Skechers GO Bionic | Skechers GO Bionic Review | 6.2 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 8 | Top pick. Highly flexible, zero drop, but firm. Great value for money. |
Optimal | Adidas Takumi Sen 2 | Adidas Takumi Sen 2 Review | 6.9 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 1 | 6 | An unusual Japanese racing shoe |
Optimal | Nike Free 3.0 Flyknit | Nike Free Review | 7.1 | 7.8 | 4.8 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 2 | 8 | |
Optimal | Modified Nike Free | Modified Nike Free | 5 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 1 | ||
Optimal | Saucony Kinvara | Saucony Kinvara 5 Review | 7.9 | 9.0 | 5.6 | 8 | 22 | 30 | 5 | 7 | An evolution towards a minimalist design, but it has more drop than the 4mm that Saucony claim. |
Optimal | Altra Torin | Altra Torin Review | 9 | 10.7 | 6.7 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 7 | |
Optimal | Brooks PureCadence | Brooks PureCadence 3 Review | 9.4 | 11.3 | 7.0 | 5 | 17 | 22 | 4 | 7 | A good level of cushioning, but it needs to be lighter. |
Optimal | Saucony Hattori | 4.4 | 11.8 | 7.3 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0.5 | 9 | Very light, with minimal cushioning. No laces unless you get the LC version. | |
Optimal | Adidas Energy Boost | Adidas Energy Boost 2 Review | 10 | 12.3 | 7.6 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 6 | A new type of foam produces a better shoe than you'd expect. Figures are without insole. |
Minimal | Mizuno Wave Universe | Mizuno Wave Universe 5 Review | 3.2 | 18.2 | 11.3 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 9 | A radically light weight racing shoe. |
Minimal | NB Trail Minimus | 6.5 | 23.3 | 14.5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | |||
Minimal | NB Road Minimus | 6.2 | 22.8 | 14.2 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | |||
Minimal | Merrell Trail Glove | 7 | 24.1 | 15.0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | |||
Minimal | Merrell Road Glove | 6.9 | 23.9 | 14.9 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | |||
Minimal | Vibram FiveFingers | 4 | 19.4 | 12.1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | |||
Minimal | Vivobarefoot One | 7 | 24.1 | 15.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |||
Not Recommended | Hoka Rapa Nui 2 Tarmac | 10.7 | 13.4 | 8.3 | 4 | 26 | 30 | 2 | Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm. | ||
Not Recommended | Hoka Conquest | Hoka Conquest Review | 11.9 | 15.2 | 9.5 | 4 | 28 | 34 | 2 | 3 | Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm. |
Not Recommended | Hoka Huaka | Hoka Huaka Review | 9.9 | 12.1 | 7.5 | 5 | 21 | 26 | 4 | 6 | Uses Hoka's RMAT foam which is overly firm. |
Not Recommended | New Balance Fresh Foam 980 | 9.1 | 10.9 | 6.8 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 2 | Less of a drop than a traditional running shoe, but too firm. | ||
Not Recommended | Brooks Transcend | 11.8 | 15.1 | 9.4 | 8 | 22 | 30 | 4 | Brooks claim it is "the Ultimate Plush Ride", but it's not much thicker and it's overly firm. | ||
Not Recommended | Skechers GOrun Ultra | Skechers GOrun Ultra Review | 9.8 | 12.0 | 7.4 | 14 | 26 | 40 | 8 | 7 | Tries to be a $80 Hoka, but fails. (Without insole the midsole is 24/34mm |
Not Recommended | Patagonia EVERlong | Patagonia EVERlong Review | 9.2 | 11.0 | 6.8 | 9 | 16 | 27 | 4 | 6 | More drop than the claimed 4mm, but no other flaws. However, other shoes do it better. |
Not Recommended | Asics GT 2000 | 10.9 | 13.7 | 8.5 | 9 | 20 | 29 | A shoe that almost defines 'traditional', included for comparison |
- Cushioning. Shoes vary in the mount of cushioning they provide. There is reasonable scientific evidence that higher levels of cushioning increase stresses on joints and have higher rates of injury. However, cushioning is also one way shoes provide protection from stones (the other is inflexibility). Cushioning can also reduce foot soreness on longer ultramarathons.
- Weight. The weight of a shoe makes a big difference in the energy cost of running. Even small changes in weight can make a big difference in how fast we run. The weight in parenthesis is my measurement, which is size 9.5-11.0 depending on the shoe. This helps compensate for shoes that claim to be lighter by making their shoes small for any given size.
- Performance Penalty. Most studies show that for each 3.5oz/100g of shoe weight performance drops by 1%. However, there is also good evidence that cushioning can improve performance, so some allowance is made for the padding. The figures here are based on 4 hour marathon pace, which is 9:09 min/mile or 5:41 min/Km pace.
- Drop & Sole thickness. The drop is difference in sole thickness between the forefoot and heel. Larger drops can interfere with natural running form, and may increase the probability of heel strike. Numbers in parenthesis are without the insole.