8,153
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
VO2max
,→V̇O2max and V̇O2peak
=V̇O<sub>2</sub>max and V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak=
[[File:VO2peak.jpg|right|thumb|x200px|This graph shows that V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak, which is the highest O<sub>2</sub> observed, without the plateau that defines V̇O<sub>2</sub>max.]]
Some research uses the term V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak rather than V̇O<sub>2</sub>max, and while the two are similar, there is an important difference. Where V̇O<sub>2</sub>max is the highest O<sub>2</sub> uptake seen, even though exercise intensity has continued to increase, V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak is simply the highest O<sub>2</sub> seen<ref name="Whipp"/>. While It's possible for V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak can to be the same as V̇O<sub>2</sub>max, there but only if the test is terminated at just the right point. The biggest problem with V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak is that a lower confidence training program might result in a subject getting better at the test, which would result in a higher V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak value, without actually changing their V̇O<sub>2</sub>max. For instance, I might have a V̇O<sub>2</sub>max of 60, but find the testing protocol so hard that I give up when my V̇O<sub>2</sub> reaches 50 which would only give a V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak value. If I do some high intensity training, I'd be more comfortable at these high workloads and I might reach a V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak of 55, which would look like a 10% improvement, but is actually not a change in physical fitness.
=References=
<references>