Changes

You can think of Critical Power as a threshold between aerobic and anaerobic exercise. While that's an oversimplification, it reflects the subjective feelings of the athlete well. In some ways it's like [[Lactate Threshold]], but far easier to determine. Critical Power has been around since 1965<ref name="MonodScherrer1965"/>, but the rise of power -based cycling trainers, cycling power meters, and now the ability to estimate running power with [[Stryd]], the concept has gained new traction. Critical Power is the highest workload you can sustain without using your anaerobic reserve, and research papers often consider this workload that an athlete can sustain "indefinitely." Or course, "indefinitely" here means until glycogen reserves get depleted, or other limiting factors set in. Typically, you can maintain Critical Power for 30-60 minutes <ref name="Hill1993"/>. Above the Critical Power, there's an amount of work you can perform anaerobically. This anaerobic work capacity is name named W' (W-prime). You can either use your W' at high intensity for a short period or a lower intensity for a longer period. This creates a curve of how long you can sustain a power level above Critical Power.

=An Analogy for Critical Power=Here's a financial analogy for Critical Power. You could think of Critical Power as your regular income, and W' as your savings. You can spend your regular income almost indefinitely and not run out of money. If you spend your money faster than you earn it, you use up your savings. You could spend your savings slowly for a longer period, or quickly for a short period. Once your savings are gone, you must spend less than your income to build your savings back up. =Why should you careShould You Care?=

* Improvements in your Critical Power show improvements in your fitness. This is a good way of evaluating the effectiveness of your training. * Critical Power can help define your running paces. To use Critical Power for pacingdo this, you can't use ll need to find your Running Critical Power when cycling directly. One option is to perform a Critical Power test while running, using [[Stryd]] (the only running power estimation that works as of April 2020see below.) The other option is to convert your cycling power to your Stryd running power. * You can use Critical Power for [[High Intensity Interval Training| HIIT]]on a bike trainer. You can structure an a HIIT workout based on your CP and W'. You can use these values to understand how stressful (and how practical) a workout will be. I use Golden Cheetah which will show the W' balance as a curve for a workout. * The CP and W' can allow you to pace shorter races (30-60 minutes). An ideal pace will be one in which you deplete W' evenly over the race, reaching near zero at the end. For longer races, other factors beyond W' depletion become the limiting factors, so it's less valuable there. Again, you'll need to know your Running Critical Power.

The gold standard for measuring CP is to perform multiple tests to define points in the CP/W' curve. You need to perform each test needs while well recovered, so each needs to be on a separate day. After a warmup, you do a fixed power workout that should cause your exhaustion between 3 and 15 minutes (durations less than 3 minutes may give an overestimate of CP<ref name="BishopJenkins2007"/>.) A total of five tests should be performed. Given these results, several online calculators will give CP and W' numbers. (One study found that CP occurred at around 83% of [[Maximum Heart Rate| Max HR]] <ref name="MielkeHoush2011"/>). ==The 3AOT Approach==There's a simpler "3 minute all out test" (3AOT) that can estimate your CP. This test must be "un-paced" where you go all out for the duration of the test. This means that power output will be very high for the first few seconds, then drop off as you deplete your W'. Between 90 and 120 seconds, you should have depleted all your W' and you can only maintain your CP . The limitation of the test is that any pacing, even subconsciously, will overestimate CP and underestimate W'<ref name="Mandell2019"/>. There are several studies that have found the 3AOT gives a good estimate of CP/W'<ref name="BurnleyDoust2006"/><ref name="DekerleVanhatalo2008"/><ref name="VanhataloDoust2007"/>. These studies found that a 3AOT can detect relatively small changes in CP from training, such as increasing CP from 230 to 255w<ref name="VanhataloDoust2008"/>. One validation technique that a study used was to exercise at 15w above and then 15w below the critical power estimate. The study found that athletes could not maintain 15w above their CP for over 10-15 minutes, where 15w below their CP was stable up to 30 minutes. However, one study found the 3AOT did not provide valid results in elite cyclists<ref name="BartramThewlis2017"/>,. That study found that the 3AOT estimated an average of 351w compared with 402w with multiple tests. This study found that the underestimated the athletes' W', measuring an average of 15.5 kJ rather than 24.3 Kj.=Problems with Critical Power=There are three problems with Critical Power: the simplifications of the model, the reality of an anaerobic threshold, and repeatability. Let's look at each in turn. ==All Models Are Wrong==The quote "all models are wrong, but some models are useful" is appropriate here. There have been several extensions of the simple two parameter model<ref name="Morton2005"/>. These extensions add more accuracy at the cost of complexity. Morton's 1996 proposal for a "3-parameter" model improves the estimates of CP and W'<ref name="Hugh Morton1996"/>. There are online calculators that will use the more sophisticated models to give better estimates.==Anerobic Threshold==The idea of Critical Power, like [[Lactate Threshold]] is to find the cut off between aerobic and aerobic plus anaerobic energy production. In reality, there is no fixed line between the two. The definition of Critical Power is often in terms of the power output that can be kept up "indefinitely" <ref name="BishopJenkins2007"/>. But it's easy to see that pace or power output declines with increasing time in a curve with no sudden line that demarks an anerobic threshold. This means that the definition of an anerobic threshold tends to depend on how long "indefinitely" is. It seems that in the areas of anerobic thresholds, it's typically 20-30 minutes. There's some evidence that Critical Power corresponds to a 30+ minute endurance<ref name="HoushHoush1989"/>. ==Repeatability of Critical Power==A study of how training changes CP/W' performed a repeatability test<ref name="GaesserWilson2008"/>. Twice they performed five bouts with exhaustion times between 1 and 10 minutes. Each bout was on a separate day in random order, and the five bouts were repeated a week later. They found that CP had good repeatability, with a correlation of the two tests of 0.92. The repeatability of W' was lower at 0.62. This suggests that tests using this approach to determine CP are valid, but caution should be used with measurements of W'. =Finding Running Critical Power=Most work on Critical Power uses a stationary bike. I found one study that used multiple runs to exhaustion<ref name="HughsonOrok2008"/>. The study used 6 treadmill runs to failure in 2-12 minutes, each one separated by at least 48 hours. The treadmill used a safety harness, which reflects the problem with treadmill running to failure. It might be possible to do similar fixed pace outdoor runs using a vehicle for pacing. Unfortunately, that's not something many of us have access to. Another approach would be to self-pace using Stryd for accurate feedback but without a heads-up display, it would be tricky to maintain a steady enough pace for the results to be valid. Performing a 3AOT while running outdoors should be possible, but the all-out sprint at the beginning has high injury risk. [[Stryd]] will estimate your Critical Power, as described at [https://blog.stryd.com/2019/07/09/introducing-auto-calculated-critical-power/], but I've not seen any independent validation.