Changes

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search

Hoka Shoe Review

223 bytes removed, 20:28, 30 April 2015
no edit summary
* '''Challenger ATR'''. This is the trail version of the awesome [[Hoka Clifton]].
* '''Constant'''. This looks like a Hoka is trying to add a medial post to prevent pronation. [[The Science of Running Shoes]] has shown these techniques are ineffective, and more likely to cause problems can help. I'd expect the shoe to be less cushioned and heavier, especially with the inclusion of the dreaded [[RMAT]]. This promises to be a truly awful shoe.
* '''Valor'''. This is a Hoka that only uses EVA foam, not the harder [[RMAT]], with a 30mm midsole, but no other details are available. Given that most Hoka shoes are around 30mm this doesn't give much idea 36/32mm sole and probably in the middle of what the shoe will beHoka weight range.* '''Vanquish'''. To me, the description "responsive performance road running This shoe" translates to "heavy has a combination of EVA foam and overly firm". There are some suggestions that this is a Conquest [[RMAT]], with a different upper34mm/30mm sole, and may be on the heavy side.* '''Odyssey. '''The description Odyssey might be nearly as light as "a lightweight, smooth-riding road shoe" is what Hoka say about all their shoes. The only useful bit of information available is the price tank of $130Clifton, cheaper than many of the Hoka shoesbut with a thicker sole (35/30mm).
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
{{:Shoes-include}}

Navigation menu