8,101
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
m
no edit summary
* The thick sole tapers from the forefoot to the front of the shoe, creating an effect that encourages a good forward lean and toe off. I've been surprised how much this has helped my biomechanics.
* There are many reports that the Hokas reduce muscle fatigue, but I found no obvious difference in muscular soreness between the Hokas and the [[Modified Nike Free]]. Opinions of other runners going to Hokas from minimalist shoes varies, with some seeing a benefit and others not.
* While the Hokas are expensive ($170 in the US), but most runners find they last longer than a traditional running shoe, so the overall costs are lower. Of course, they don't last as long as some minimalist shoes; I get 2,000+ miles out of my [[Modified Nike FreesFree]]s, but I only get I around 600 miles out of my Hokas.
=The Hoka Problems=
* The thick sole of the Hokas produces a greater ankle stress on uneven surfaces. The wider sole reduces this problem a little, but when trail running this is still an issue. In the past I have never had trouble with twisting my ankles, but the Hokas did cause some ankle stress and pain.
* The Mafate has an aggressive outsole with lugs that are reminiscent of the [http://go.fellrnr.com/?id=35454X937677&xs=1&xcust=RrsInovTalon&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.roadrunnersports.com%2Frrs%2Fproducts%2FINN114%2F Inov-8 X-Talon]. These shoes work well for muddy trails, but are not so nice on asphalt.
* I've found little difference between the Bondi Speed and the Bondi B, and I generally prefer the speed.
* Hoka is introducing two new shoes , that are currently only available in Europe, the trail Rapa Nui Comp and the road Kailua Comp.* The Asics and Nike Free are included for comparison purposes.
