8,160
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Altra Escalante 1.5 Review}} The Altra Escalante is a wonderful shoe, and the 1.5 iteration is a minor tweak to a successful platform. The Escalante one of..."
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Altra Escalante 1.5 Review}}
The [[Altra]] Escalante is a wonderful shoe, and the 1.5 iteration is a minor tweak to a successful platform. The Escalante one of the few shoes that using TPU foam rather than the traditional EVA foam. This TPU foam should (and does) last much longer than EVA foam, but it also can feel quite a lot bouncier. I was a little disappointed by the [[Saucony Freedom]] which seemed a little dead in its responsiveness, whereas the Escalante has a really nice spring to its feel. It's also quite close to being zero drop, and unusually is actually slightly negative drop, with the forefoot higher than the heel. The upper is a nice, stretchable material, though it's not terribly breathable. The toe box shape matches the human foot, but like many [[Altra]] shoes, I find there is not enough height in the toe box. The cushioning-to-weight ratio is right up there with the [[Hoka Clifton]], a remarkable feat. This is the best cushioning to weight ratio I've seen in a TPU midsole shoe, in spite of the weight savings Saucony put into the upper on their Freedom shoe. The Escalante is one of those rare shoes that makes you want to go for a run, or to run further, even when you know you're too tired. Putting it on after wearing other shoes gives me a sense of comfort and excitement, and I regret that the need to test other shoes means I have to put them to one side for a while. I rated the Escalate as "best of the best" and is my highest rated all round running shoe. There is also a slightly lighter weight version of this shoe, the [[Altra Escalante Racer]], as well as the original [[Altra Escalante 1]]. {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}}
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px class="center">
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (4).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (1).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (2).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (3).jpg
</gallery>
=Characteristics =
* {{H:cushioning}}. The Escalante uses expanded TPU beads instead of the more usual EVA foam. That's the technology that's found in the [[Adidas Energy Boost]] and [[Saucony Freedom]] and it's a relatively new technology. The idea is that TPU provides more spring than EVA foam and it lasts longer. The Escalante is better cushioned than the Boost, and quite a bit lighter. Like the Boost, it has the springy, bouncy feel that makes TPU cushioning so attractive. The level of cushioning is actually up there with the massively cushioned Hoka shoes, and it's virtually the same as the [[Hoka Odyssey]]. The Escalante provides this level of cushioning with a midsole that is much thinner (25mm compared with 45mm in the Odyssey), so you don't have the stilt effect that can create additional stress on the ankles. Other than being nicely springy, I didn't find the cushioning was strange or unusual, unlike the Freedom that was just slightly weird. The Escalante has a moderately thick insole, but it seems to be rather more resilient than some shoes I've tried. (The 1.5 has slightly different thicknesses in the midsole, but I couldn't perceive the difference.) I compared the Escalante with the [[Hoka Clifton]] side-by-side, which is not something I'd recommend as the difference in heights can cause injury. This height difference was dramatic, but the shoes felt surprisingly similar in cushioning. If I landed heavily I could feel the extra thickness of the Clifton, but not during more normal running.
* {{H:drop}}. Altra always claim issues a zero drop, but typically I find they're out by just a few millimeters. The Escalante is actually a slightly negative drop shoe, with the forefoot higher than the heel. I doubt if many runners will notice this, as it only about a millimeter. I found that overall, the Escalante felt very natural under foot, and the almost zero-drop is part of the success.
* {{H:structure}}. There's nothing about the Escalante to interfere with your running form. The midsole is slightly higher under the arch, but this shouldn't be enough to make contact, or create pressure that could irritate the plantar fascia. There is no medial post or other structures that would try to limit pronation.
* {{H:flexibility}}. The Escalante is quite flexible, and the forefoot is springy; I'm not sure if that really improves running economy, but it certainly doesn't hurt. The gaps in the rubber outsole allow the forefoot to bend evenly, rather than causing a crease in a specific area.
* {{H:outsole}}. As you can see from the pictures above, the Escalante has harder rubber outsole under most of the sole of the shoe. This hard rubber actually protrudes a few millimeters, so I've seen no evidence of midsole abrasion at all. The shape of the sole does not create any stone traps.
* {{H:shape}}. The shape of the Escalante means that there is relatively little reason to [[Shoe Dissection| cut open the toe box]]. When looking from above, the shape of the shoe matches the human foot reasonably well, though like all Altra shoes it's a little exaggerated, and there is not quite enough room for the smallest toes. If you look at the shoe from the side, there is not quite enough headroom, but that wasn't too much of an issue with the Escalante. Overall, the shape was good enough that I didn't have to cut open the toe box, though issues with the upper did cause me to open the Escalante up (see below).
* {{H:upper}}. The upper part of the Escalante is mostly seamless, and quite stretchy in one direction. It's thick material that make it is one of the less breathable shoes I've tested in a while. With the exception of the toe box issues, I found the upper extremely comfortable. The ankle opening is rather more cushioned than a typical running shoe. It's close to the massive cushioning that made the [[Altra Instinct 2]] feel a bit like a skateboarding shoe. (The 1.5 has a different upper to the original, though I struggled to detect the changes. Apparently, a number of runners had issues with the uppers stretching over time, but I didn't experience that over the 300+ miles I ran in them.)
* {{H:tongue}}. The Escalante has a traditional styled tongue that is sown in along one edge to keep it in place. I think this is probably one of the best approach is to tongue design. There is no padding in the tongue at all, but the material that used seems to spread the forces fairly well, so I don't think many runners will have an issue with the laces irritating the top of the foot.
* {{H:lacing}}. The Escalante has flat laces that work reasonably well, but they're a little slick, and I had a few occasions where they came undone mid-run.
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Escalante has only a slightest hint of a heel counter, and unless you probe carefully you're unlikely to detect it. While I'd rather there was no heel counter at all, this is one of the more benign designs.
{{FastBlr|Saucony/type-a6-597|597|Altra Escalante 1.5}}
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
{{:Shoes-include}}
The [[Altra]] Escalante is a wonderful shoe, and the 1.5 iteration is a minor tweak to a successful platform. The Escalante one of the few shoes that using TPU foam rather than the traditional EVA foam. This TPU foam should (and does) last much longer than EVA foam, but it also can feel quite a lot bouncier. I was a little disappointed by the [[Saucony Freedom]] which seemed a little dead in its responsiveness, whereas the Escalante has a really nice spring to its feel. It's also quite close to being zero drop, and unusually is actually slightly negative drop, with the forefoot higher than the heel. The upper is a nice, stretchable material, though it's not terribly breathable. The toe box shape matches the human foot, but like many [[Altra]] shoes, I find there is not enough height in the toe box. The cushioning-to-weight ratio is right up there with the [[Hoka Clifton]], a remarkable feat. This is the best cushioning to weight ratio I've seen in a TPU midsole shoe, in spite of the weight savings Saucony put into the upper on their Freedom shoe. The Escalante is one of those rare shoes that makes you want to go for a run, or to run further, even when you know you're too tired. Putting it on after wearing other shoes gives me a sense of comfort and excitement, and I regret that the need to test other shoes means I have to put them to one side for a while. I rated the Escalate as "best of the best" and is my highest rated all round running shoe. There is also a slightly lighter weight version of this shoe, the [[Altra Escalante Racer]], as well as the original [[Altra Escalante 1]]. {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}}
<gallery widths=300px heights=300px class="center">
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (4).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (1).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (2).jpg
File:Altra Escalante 1.5 (3).jpg
</gallery>
=Characteristics =
* {{H:cushioning}}. The Escalante uses expanded TPU beads instead of the more usual EVA foam. That's the technology that's found in the [[Adidas Energy Boost]] and [[Saucony Freedom]] and it's a relatively new technology. The idea is that TPU provides more spring than EVA foam and it lasts longer. The Escalante is better cushioned than the Boost, and quite a bit lighter. Like the Boost, it has the springy, bouncy feel that makes TPU cushioning so attractive. The level of cushioning is actually up there with the massively cushioned Hoka shoes, and it's virtually the same as the [[Hoka Odyssey]]. The Escalante provides this level of cushioning with a midsole that is much thinner (25mm compared with 45mm in the Odyssey), so you don't have the stilt effect that can create additional stress on the ankles. Other than being nicely springy, I didn't find the cushioning was strange or unusual, unlike the Freedom that was just slightly weird. The Escalante has a moderately thick insole, but it seems to be rather more resilient than some shoes I've tried. (The 1.5 has slightly different thicknesses in the midsole, but I couldn't perceive the difference.) I compared the Escalante with the [[Hoka Clifton]] side-by-side, which is not something I'd recommend as the difference in heights can cause injury. This height difference was dramatic, but the shoes felt surprisingly similar in cushioning. If I landed heavily I could feel the extra thickness of the Clifton, but not during more normal running.
* {{H:drop}}. Altra always claim issues a zero drop, but typically I find they're out by just a few millimeters. The Escalante is actually a slightly negative drop shoe, with the forefoot higher than the heel. I doubt if many runners will notice this, as it only about a millimeter. I found that overall, the Escalante felt very natural under foot, and the almost zero-drop is part of the success.
* {{H:structure}}. There's nothing about the Escalante to interfere with your running form. The midsole is slightly higher under the arch, but this shouldn't be enough to make contact, or create pressure that could irritate the plantar fascia. There is no medial post or other structures that would try to limit pronation.
* {{H:flexibility}}. The Escalante is quite flexible, and the forefoot is springy; I'm not sure if that really improves running economy, but it certainly doesn't hurt. The gaps in the rubber outsole allow the forefoot to bend evenly, rather than causing a crease in a specific area.
* {{H:outsole}}. As you can see from the pictures above, the Escalante has harder rubber outsole under most of the sole of the shoe. This hard rubber actually protrudes a few millimeters, so I've seen no evidence of midsole abrasion at all. The shape of the sole does not create any stone traps.
* {{H:shape}}. The shape of the Escalante means that there is relatively little reason to [[Shoe Dissection| cut open the toe box]]. When looking from above, the shape of the shoe matches the human foot reasonably well, though like all Altra shoes it's a little exaggerated, and there is not quite enough room for the smallest toes. If you look at the shoe from the side, there is not quite enough headroom, but that wasn't too much of an issue with the Escalante. Overall, the shape was good enough that I didn't have to cut open the toe box, though issues with the upper did cause me to open the Escalante up (see below).
* {{H:upper}}. The upper part of the Escalante is mostly seamless, and quite stretchy in one direction. It's thick material that make it is one of the less breathable shoes I've tested in a while. With the exception of the toe box issues, I found the upper extremely comfortable. The ankle opening is rather more cushioned than a typical running shoe. It's close to the massive cushioning that made the [[Altra Instinct 2]] feel a bit like a skateboarding shoe. (The 1.5 has a different upper to the original, though I struggled to detect the changes. Apparently, a number of runners had issues with the uppers stretching over time, but I didn't experience that over the 300+ miles I ran in them.)
* {{H:tongue}}. The Escalante has a traditional styled tongue that is sown in along one edge to keep it in place. I think this is probably one of the best approach is to tongue design. There is no padding in the tongue at all, but the material that used seems to spread the forces fairly well, so I don't think many runners will have an issue with the laces irritating the top of the foot.
* {{H:lacing}}. The Escalante has flat laces that work reasonably well, but they're a little slick, and I had a few occasions where they came undone mid-run.
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Escalante has only a slightest hint of a heel counter, and unless you probe carefully you're unlikely to detect it. While I'd rather there was no heel counter at all, this is one of the more benign designs.
{{FastBlr|Saucony/type-a6-597|597|Altra Escalante 1.5}}
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
{{:Shoes-include}}
