Best Running Headphones

Revision as of 04:02, 9 July 2011 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) (Koss Sportapro)

Revision as of 04:02, 9 July 2011 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) (Koss Sportapro)

These are the headphones that produce the best sound for the money and work well when running, as well as some alternatives to consider.

Contents

1 Highly Recommended

1.1 Koss Sportapro

These headphones produce remarkable sound for $23 and these are the headphones I wear when running.

Pros

  • Wonderful sound quality, which is far better than any earbuds I’ve tried, including expensive options like Shure.
  • An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
  • The headband allows you to remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you don’t have to pause the music.
  • They do not fit under a winter hat, but they work fine over the top of the hat.
  • These headphones lasted longer than any others I've tried, dieing after 14 months of continual usage. They also have a lifetime warranty so Koss will replace them for a $9 shipping fee.

Cons

  • In hot weather, the pads keep your ears from getting the cool air.
  • The looks will not suit everyone.
  • Do not work under a cycling helmet.

SportaPro_1.jpg

1.2 Koss KSC75

These have similar sound to the Sportapro and are cheaper at $16. I use these when cycling (not on the road).

Pros

  • Wonderful sound quality, though not quite as good as the Sportapros, though the difference is small.
  • An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
  • Works under a cycling helmet.

Cons

  • You can’t remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you have to pause the music.
  • The looks will not suit everyone.

KSC75_1.jpg

2 Options to Consider

2.1 Apple Remote Control Earbuds

The sound quality is mediocre, but the remote control is wonderful, when it works. Given the problems, they are expensive at $29.

Pros

  • Remote control on the wire.

Cons

  • Poor sound quality.
  • Appalling build quality. They need [[1]] to be useful running and even then will not last long. (NB, I've tried remote control adapters for the Apple iPod, but they don't last long either.)
  • Don’t stay in the ears without Innovelis BudFits

211JIv2XBIL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.2 Shure Earbuds

I’ve tried several of the cheaper (~$100) Shure earbuds and they don’t work for me, but YMMV.

Pros

  • Good sound quality for an earbud when stationary.

Cons

  • When sealed against the ear (which is needed for good sound), each footstep ‘booms’. This made them unusable to me.
  • Expensive for the sound quality (Koss are better and cheaper)

215gHbDw8AL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.3 Sennheiser MX85

These $30 earbuds work quite well for running.

Pros

  • They stay in the ears quite well when running.
  • They have a clip to attach the wire to clothing so the weight of the wire is not on your ears.

Cons

  • Sound quality is mediocre.

31I3w74MYJL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.4 Koss Portapro

At $30, these are the best sounding of the Koss headphones I’ve tried, but they do not work quite so well for running. I have a pair for non-running listening.

Pros

  • Best sound quality I’ve come across.

Cons

  • Do not stay in place as well as the other Koss headphones mentioned.

PortaPro_1.jpg