Difference between revisions of "Best Running Headphones"

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
m (Koss Portapro)
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==Highly Recommended==
 
==Highly Recommended==
 
===Koss Sportapro===
 
===Koss Sportapro===
These headphones produce remarkable sound for [http://www.amazon.com/Koss-155475-SportaPro-Stereo-Headphones/dp/B00001P505 $23].  
+
These headphones produce remarkable sound for [http://www.amazon.com/Koss-155475-SportaPro-Stereo-Headphones/dp/B00001P505 $23] and these are the headphones I wear when running.  
  
 
'''Pros'''
 
'''Pros'''
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
 
* An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
 
* The headband allows you to remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you don’t have to pause the music.  
 
* The headband allows you to remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you don’t have to pause the music.  
 +
* They do not fit under a winter hat, but they work fine over the top of the hat.
 
'''Cons'''
 
'''Cons'''
 
* In hot weather, the pads keep your ears from getting the cool air.
 
* In hot weather, the pads keep your ears from getting the cool air.
* They do not fit under a winter hat well.
 
 
* The looks will not suit everyone.
 
* The looks will not suit everyone.
 +
* Do not work under a cycling helmet.
 
http://www.koss.com/koss/kossweb.nsf/05prodsbymodelal/SportaPro/$FILE/SportaPro_1.jpg
 
http://www.koss.com/koss/kossweb.nsf/05prodsbymodelal/SportaPro/$FILE/SportaPro_1.jpg
 
===Koss KSC75===
 
===Koss KSC75===
These have similar sound to the Sportapro and are cheaper at [http://www.amazon.com/Koss-KSC75-Portable-Stereophone-Headphones/dp/B0006B486K $16]. I use these in winter, under a warm hat.  
+
These have similar sound to the Sportapro and are cheaper at [http://www.amazon.com/Koss-KSC75-Portable-Stereophone-Headphones/dp/B0006B486K $16]. I use these when cycling (not on the road).  
  
 
'''Pros'''
 
'''Pros'''
 
* Wonderful sound quality, though not quite as good as the Sportapros, though the difference is small.  
 
* Wonderful sound quality, though not quite as good as the Sportapros, though the difference is small.  
 
* An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
 
* An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
 +
* Works under a cycling helmet.
 
'''Cons'''
 
'''Cons'''
* They need to be under a winter hat to keep them in place while running.
 
 
* You can’t remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you have to pause the music.  
 
* You can’t remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you have to pause the music.  
 
* The looks will not suit everyone.
 
* The looks will not suit everyone.

Revision as of 06:30, 11 February 2011

These are the headphones that produce the best sound for the money and work well when running, as well as some alternatives to consider.

1 Highly Recommended

1.1 Koss Sportapro

These headphones produce remarkable sound for $23 and these are the headphones I wear when running.

Pros

  • Wonderful sound quality, which is far better than any earbuds I’ve tried, including expensive options like Shure.
  • An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
  • The headband allows you to remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you don’t have to pause the music.
  • They do not fit under a winter hat, but they work fine over the top of the hat.

Cons

  • In hot weather, the pads keep your ears from getting the cool air.
  • The looks will not suit everyone.
  • Do not work under a cycling helmet.

SportaPro_1.jpg

1.2 Koss KSC75

These have similar sound to the Sportapro and are cheaper at $16. I use these when cycling (not on the road).

Pros

  • Wonderful sound quality, though not quite as good as the Sportapros, though the difference is small.
  • An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
  • Works under a cycling helmet.

Cons

  • You can’t remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you have to pause the music.
  • The looks will not suit everyone.

KSC75_1.jpg

2 Options to Consider

2.1 Apple Remote Control Earbuds

The sound quality is mediocre, but the remote control is wonderful, when it works. Given the problems, they are expensive at $29.

Pros

  • Remote control on the wire.

Cons

  • Poor sound quality.
  • Appalling build quality. They need [[1]] to be useful running and even then will not last long. (NB, I've tried remote control adapters for the Apple iPod, but they don't last long either.)
  • Don’t stay in the ears without Innovelis BudFits

211JIv2XBIL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.2 Shure Earbuds

I’ve tried several of the cheaper (~$100) Shure earbuds and they don’t work for me, but YMMV.

Pros

  • Good sound quality for an earbud when stationary.

Cons

  • When sealed against the ear (which is needed for good sound), each footstep ‘booms’. This made them unusable to me.
  • Expensive for the sound quality (Koss are better and cheaper)

215gHbDw8AL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.3 Sennheiser MX85

These $30 earbuds work quite well for running.

Pros

  • They stay in the ears quite well when running.
  • They have a clip to attach the wire to clothing so the weight of the wire is not on your ears.

Cons

  • Sound quality is mediocre.

31I3w74MYJL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

2.4 Koss Portapro

At $30, these are the best sounding of the Koss headphones I’ve tried, but they do not work quite so well for running. I have a pair for non-running listening.

Pros

  • Best sound quality I’ve come across.

Cons

  • Do not stay in place as well as the other Koss headphones mentioned.

PortaPro_1.jpg