Difference between revisions of "Weight Loss and Performance"

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
It seems intuitive that excess body fat makes a runner slower. Body fat does not help you run, and adds weight that must be carried. The science seems to support this, as aerobic performance is based on how much oxygen you can use, and it is primarily muscle that is using that oxygen, not fat. But how much difference does body fat make?
+
It seems intuitive that excess body fat makes a runner slower. Body fat does not help you run, and adds weight that must be carried. The science seems to support this, as aerobic performance is based on how much oxygen you can use, and it is primarily [[Muscle|muscle]] that is using that oxygen, not fat. But how much difference does body fat make? There's a simple answer based on the weight of fat, but the reality might be more complex.
−
 
+
= The Simple Answer =
−
== Wild, optimistic assumptions ==
+
The first assumption is that [[Jack Daniels Running Formula]] [[VDOT]] is close enough to [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] to be useful. [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] is how much oxygen you can use per minute per Kg of body weight. The second assumption is that you can lose body fat without losing any muscle. If [[VDOT]] is how much oxygen you use per Kg body weight, then you can multiply [[VDOT]] by body weight to work out the total max oxygen use. If you lose body fat only, then the total max oxygen should stay the same. You can then divide the total max oxygen use by the new body weight to get a new [[VDOT]]. This is worked out in my [[Running Calculator]], and losing 5% of body weight will give a roughly 5% improvement in performance.
−
First assumption is that [[Jack Daniels Running Formula]] [[VDOT]] is close enough to [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] to be useful. [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] is how much oxygen you can use per minute per Kg of body weight. The second assumption is that you can lose body fat without losing any muscle.
 
−
 
 
−
== Using VDOT for weight/performance changes ==
 
−
If [[VDOT]] is how much oxygen you use per Kg body weight, then you can multiply [[VDOT]] by body weight to work out the total max oxygen use. If you lose body fat only, then the total max oxygen should stay the same. You can then divide the total max oxygen use by the new body weight to get a new [[VDOT]].
 
−
 
 
 
== A worked example ==
 
== A worked example ==
−
Let's work an example with a hypothetical runner who completes a marathon in 3:10 and weighs 220 Lb. A marathon time of 3:10 is a [[VDOT]] value of 50, which we will assume is also a [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] of 50. A [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] of 50 means you consume 50 ml of oxygen per Kg of body weight per minute. If you weigh 220 Lb, which is 100 Kg, and your [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] is 50, that equates a total Oxygen consumption of 5000 (ml/min). Reversing the equation above, 200 Lb is 91 Kg and 5000 / 91 is a VO2max of 55. A [[VDOT]] of 55 equates to a marathon time of 2:56. That's a reduction of 14 minutes in marathon time. The [[VDOT Calculator]] will work out this for you.  
+
Let's work an example with a hypothetical runner who completes a marathon in 3:10 and weighs 220 Lb. A marathon time of 3:10 is a [[VDOT]] value of 50, which we will assume is also a [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] of 50. A [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] of 50 means you consume 50 ml of oxygen per Kg of body weight per minute. If you weigh 220 Lb, which is 100 Kg, and your [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] is 50, that equates a total Oxygen consumption of 5000 (ml/min). Reversing the equation above, 200 Lb is 91 Kg and 5000 / 91 is a [[VO2max]] of 55. A [[VDOT]] of 55 equates to a marathon time of 2:56. That's a reduction of 14 minutes in marathon time. The [[Running Calculator]] will work out this for you.  
−
 
+
= The Bigger Impact of Body Fat=
−
== The flaws in this idea - losing fat ==
+
Studies have shown that body fat may impact performance more than you'd expect based on simple weight reduction. For instance, a study of 11 elite runners showed that a 5% reduction in body fat resulted in a roughly 15% improvement in running economy<ref name="i754"/>.
 +
[[File:Body Fat and RE in Elites.jpeg |center|thumb|300px|Running Economy in Elite Runners]]
 +
Another study went further, and found that age and body fat are the strongest predictors of [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] <ref name="c274"/>.
 +
[[File:Body fat and VO2max.png|400px|thumb|center|[[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] and Body Fat]]
 +
The study found that their [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] estimate varied by this formula:
 +
[[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]]  = 129.6−(25.1× Log<sub>10</sub>(%fat)) − (34.0× Log<sub>10</sub>(age))
 +
Here's a table of how that looks for someone aged 59. As you can see, at high body fat levels, the performance improvement from weight loss is smaller than at low body fat levels.
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: none;"
 +
! % body fat
 +
! age
 +
! [[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]]
 +
! % change
 +
|-
 +
| 30
 +
| 59
 +
| 32.3
 +
| 100%
 +
|-
 +
| 29
 +
| 59
 +
| 32.7
 +
| 101%
 +
|-
 +
| 28
 +
| 59
 +
| 33.1
 +
| 102%
 +
|-
 +
| 27
 +
| 59
 +
| 33.5
 +
| 104%
 +
|-
 +
| 26
 +
| 59
 +
| 33.9
 +
| 105%
 +
|-
 +
| 25
 +
| 59
 +
| 34.3
 +
| 106%
 +
|-
 +
| 24
 +
| 59
 +
| 34.7
 +
| 108%
 +
|-
 +
| 23
 +
| 59
 +
| 35.2
 +
| 109%
 +
|-
 +
| 22
 +
| 59
 +
| 35.7
 +
| 110%
 +
|-
 +
| 21
 +
| 59
 +
| 36.2
 +
| 112%
 +
|-
 +
| 20
 +
| 59
 +
| 36.7
 +
| 114%
 +
|-
 +
| 19
 +
| 59
 +
| 37.3
 +
| 115%
 +
|-
 +
| 18
 +
| 59
 +
| 37.9
 +
| 117%
 +
|-
 +
| 17
 +
| 59
 +
| 38.5
 +
| 119%
 +
|-
 +
| 16
 +
| 59
 +
| 39.2
 +
| 121%
 +
|-
 +
| 15
 +
| 59
 +
| 39.9
 +
| 123%
 +
|-
 +
| 14
 +
| 59
 +
| 40.6
 +
| 126%
 +
|-
 +
| 13
 +
| 59
 +
| 41.4
 +
| 128%
 +
|-
 +
| 12
 +
| 59
 +
| 42.3
 +
| 131%
 +
|-
 +
| 11
 +
| 59
 +
| 43.3
 +
| 134%
 +
|-
 +
| 10
 +
| 59
 +
| 44.3
 +
| 137%
 +
|-
 +
| 9
 +
| 59
 +
| 45.4
 +
| 141%
 +
|-
 +
| 8
 +
| 59
 +
| 46.7
 +
| 145%
 +
|-
 +
| 7
 +
| 59
 +
| 48.2
 +
| 149%
 +
|-
 +
| 6
 +
| 59
 +
| 49.9
 +
| 154%
 +
|-
 +
| 5
 +
| 59
 +
| 51.8
 +
| 160%
 +
|}
 +
=Body fat and heat dissipation=
 +
Unless the temperature is quite cold, our maximum running speed is defined by our ability to shed heat. In turn, our ability to shed heat is defined by height and weight and because we cannot change our height, our weight becomes the main determinant. Therefore, losing body fat can improve our ability to run at speed in mild or warm conditions.
 +
=Body fat and glycogen storage=
 +
One limiting factor in running marathon distance races is our ability to store [[Glycogen]]. Because [[Glycogen]] is only stored in the muscles and liver, excess body fat reduces the percentage of muscle and therefore percentage of [[Glycogen]] that can be stored.
 +
= The flaws in this idea - losing fat =
 
It is very hard to lose weight, and it is even harder to lose weight without losing muscle. I suspect that this is a bigger problem than any issues of [[VDOT]]/[[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] correlation. On the other hand, my personal experience is that losing weight does give a significant boost in performance.
 
It is very hard to lose weight, and it is even harder to lose weight without losing muscle. I suspect that this is a bigger problem than any issues of [[VDOT]]/[[VO2max|V̇O<sub>2</sub>max]] correlation. On the other hand, my personal experience is that losing weight does give a significant boost in performance.
−
 
+
= The flaws in this idea - too thin to win =
−
== The flaws in this idea - too thin to win ==
 
 
If you have 30% body fat, reducing it to 20% body fat, you will get a performance improvement. But if your body fat is already low, reducing it will just impair your health. Reducing your body fat too low is dangerous, as some body fat is essential to life. Concerns with body fat and body image can lead to eating disorders.  These problems can come from reducing calorie intake to the point where the diet lacks essential nutrients. However, this can involve pathological dieting - laxative abuse, vomiting, skipping meals, etc. This is very serious. Be mindful of the possibility of eating problems in yourself and those you care about, and seek qualified help if needed.  
 
If you have 30% body fat, reducing it to 20% body fat, you will get a performance improvement. But if your body fat is already low, reducing it will just impair your health. Reducing your body fat too low is dangerous, as some body fat is essential to life. Concerns with body fat and body image can lead to eating disorders.  These problems can come from reducing calorie intake to the point where the diet lacks essential nutrients. However, this can involve pathological dieting - laxative abuse, vomiting, skipping meals, etc. This is very serious. Be mindful of the possibility of eating problems in yourself and those you care about, and seek qualified help if needed.  
 
   
 
   
−
== Body fat as fuel ==
+
= Body fat as fuel =
−
You might think that more body fat would help provide fuel on very long runs. However, one pound of fat provides about 3,500 calories, enough to fuel a runner for 35 miles, assuming no other fuel is used (eaten, glycogen, etc).
+
You might think that more body fat would help provide fuel on very [[Long Run|long runs]]. However, one pound of fat provides about 3,500 calories, enough to fuel a runner for 35 miles, assuming no other fuel is used (eaten, [[Glycogen]], etc).
 +
=References=
 +
<references>
 +
<ref name="i754">Øyvind Støren, Jan Helgerud, Jan Hoff, Running Stride Peak Forces Inversely Determine Running Economy in Elite Runners, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, volume 25, issue 1, date 2011, ISSN [http://www.worldcat.org/issn/1064-8011 1064-8011], doi [http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b62c8a 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b62c8a], free !!doi-access!!, pages 117–123</ref>
 +
<ref name="c274">José A. Serrano-Sánchez, Safira Delgado-Guerra, Hugo Olmedillas, Amelia Guadalupe-Grau, Rafael Arteaga-Ortiz, Joaquín Sanchis-Moysi, Cecilia Dorado, José A. L. Calbet, Adiposity and Age Explain Most of the Association between Physical Activity and Fitness in Physically Active Men, PLoS ONE, volume 5, issue 10, date 2010-10-18, ISSN [http://www.worldcat.org/issn/1932-6203 1932-6203], PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20976154 20976154], 2956676 !!pmc!!, doi [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013435 10.1371/journal.pone.0013435], free !!doi-access!!, page e13435</ref>
 +
</references>

Latest revision as of 04:55, 14 November 2024

It seems intuitive that excess body fat makes a runner slower. Body fat does not help you run, and adds weight that must be carried. The science seems to support this, as aerobic performance is based on how much oxygen you can use, and it is primarily muscle that is using that oxygen, not fat. But how much difference does body fat make? There's a simple answer based on the weight of fat, but the reality might be more complex.

1 The Simple Answer

The first assumption is that Jack Daniels Running Formula VDOT is close enough to V̇O2max to be useful. V̇O2max is how much oxygen you can use per minute per Kg of body weight. The second assumption is that you can lose body fat without losing any muscle. If VDOT is how much oxygen you use per Kg body weight, then you can multiply VDOT by body weight to work out the total max oxygen use. If you lose body fat only, then the total max oxygen should stay the same. You can then divide the total max oxygen use by the new body weight to get a new VDOT. This is worked out in my Running Calculator, and losing 5% of body weight will give a roughly 5% improvement in performance.

1.1 A worked example

Let's work an example with a hypothetical runner who completes a marathon in 3:10 and weighs 220 Lb. A marathon time of 3:10 is a VDOT value of 50, which we will assume is also a V̇O2max of 50. A V̇O2max of 50 means you consume 50 ml of oxygen per Kg of body weight per minute. If you weigh 220 Lb, which is 100 Kg, and your V̇O2max is 50, that equates a total Oxygen consumption of 5000 (ml/min). Reversing the equation above, 200 Lb is 91 Kg and 5000 / 91 is a VO2max of 55. A VDOT of 55 equates to a marathon time of 2:56. That's a reduction of 14 minutes in marathon time. The Running Calculator will work out this for you.

2 The Bigger Impact of Body Fat

Studies have shown that body fat may impact performance more than you'd expect based on simple weight reduction. For instance, a study of 11 elite runners showed that a 5% reduction in body fat resulted in a roughly 15% improvement in running economy[1].

Running Economy in Elite Runners

Another study went further, and found that age and body fat are the strongest predictors of V̇O2max [2].

V̇O2max and Body Fat

The study found that their V̇O2max estimate varied by this formula: V̇O2max = 129.6−(25.1× Log10(%fat)) − (34.0× Log10(age)) Here's a table of how that looks for someone aged 59. As you can see, at high body fat levels, the performance improvement from weight loss is smaller than at low body fat levels.

 % body fat age V̇O2max  % change
30 59 32.3 100%
29 59 32.7 101%
28 59 33.1 102%
27 59 33.5 104%
26 59 33.9 105%
25 59 34.3 106%
24 59 34.7 108%
23 59 35.2 109%
22 59 35.7 110%
21 59 36.2 112%
20 59 36.7 114%
19 59 37.3 115%
18 59 37.9 117%
17 59 38.5 119%
16 59 39.2 121%
15 59 39.9 123%
14 59 40.6 126%
13 59 41.4 128%
12 59 42.3 131%
11 59 43.3 134%
10 59 44.3 137%
9 59 45.4 141%
8 59 46.7 145%
7 59 48.2 149%
6 59 49.9 154%
5 59 51.8 160%

3 Body fat and heat dissipation

Unless the temperature is quite cold, our maximum running speed is defined by our ability to shed heat. In turn, our ability to shed heat is defined by height and weight and because we cannot change our height, our weight becomes the main determinant. Therefore, losing body fat can improve our ability to run at speed in mild or warm conditions.

4 Body fat and glycogen storage

One limiting factor in running marathon distance races is our ability to store Glycogen. Because Glycogen is only stored in the muscles and liver, excess body fat reduces the percentage of muscle and therefore percentage of Glycogen that can be stored.

5 The flaws in this idea - losing fat

It is very hard to lose weight, and it is even harder to lose weight without losing muscle. I suspect that this is a bigger problem than any issues of VDOT/V̇O2max correlation. On the other hand, my personal experience is that losing weight does give a significant boost in performance.

6 The flaws in this idea - too thin to win

If you have 30% body fat, reducing it to 20% body fat, you will get a performance improvement. But if your body fat is already low, reducing it will just impair your health. Reducing your body fat too low is dangerous, as some body fat is essential to life. Concerns with body fat and body image can lead to eating disorders. These problems can come from reducing calorie intake to the point where the diet lacks essential nutrients. However, this can involve pathological dieting - laxative abuse, vomiting, skipping meals, etc. This is very serious. Be mindful of the possibility of eating problems in yourself and those you care about, and seek qualified help if needed.

7 Body fat as fuel

You might think that more body fat would help provide fuel on very long runs. However, one pound of fat provides about 3,500 calories, enough to fuel a runner for 35 miles, assuming no other fuel is used (eaten, Glycogen, etc).

8 References

  1. ↑ Øyvind Støren, Jan Helgerud, Jan Hoff, Running Stride Peak Forces Inversely Determine Running Economy in Elite Runners, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, volume 25, issue 1, date 2011, ISSN 1064-8011, doi 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b62c8a, free !!doi-access!!, pages 117–123
  2. ↑ José A. Serrano-Sánchez, Safira Delgado-Guerra, Hugo Olmedillas, Amelia Guadalupe-Grau, Rafael Arteaga-Ortiz, Joaquín Sanchis-Moysi, Cecilia Dorado, José A. L. Calbet, Adiposity and Age Explain Most of the Association between Physical Activity and Fitness in Physically Active Men, PLoS ONE, volume 5, issue 10, date 2010-10-18, ISSN 1932-6203, PMID 20976154, 2956676 !!pmc!!, doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0013435, free !!doi-access!!, page e13435
Retrieved from "http://fellrnr.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Weight_Loss_and_Performance&oldid=12464"