8,153
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Hoka Tracer Review}} The Hoka Tracer builds on the success of the wonderful Hoka Clifton. The Clifton is one of the best selling shoes, and I feel the Trace..."
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Hoka Tracer Review}}
The Hoka Tracer builds on the success of the wonderful [[Hoka Clifton]]. The Clifton is one of the best selling shoes, and I feel the Tracer is remarkably close in its function and design. Both shoes have stunning cushioning for their weight, with the Tracer coming in about an ounce lighter than the Clifton, but with slightly less cushioning. Using the [[RMAT]] foam as the outsole material works rather well, and I think the Tracer shows Hoka's growing maturity with this advanced material. Their initial attempts to make a shoe using [[RMAT]] for the midsole produced a heavy and hard shoe that seemed remarkably pointless to me. However, they found that [[RMAT]] has great grip on a wide variety of surfaces, and makes an outstanding outsole as it combines this grip with better cushioning than a traditional rubber and better wear characteristics than an exposed midsole. They've used [[RMAT]] to great effect on the [[Hoka Mafate]] and my favorite hiking boots, the [[Hoka Tor Ultra]]. When you run in the Tracer it feels a lot like the Clifton (both the first and second versions), though I found the upper to be slightly less comfortable. My main quibble with the Tracer is in the shape of the toe box, but this is a problem with virtually every running shoe on the market. I have some minor concerns with the way the midsole extends out from the outside edge of the forefoot, as noted below under "structure". The Tracer is rather pricy, so if you're after something with similar cushioning, for less money and with less weight then check out the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]. Overall the Tracer is an outstanding shoe, and I've rated it as "The Best of the Best." {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}}
{| class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-top.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer top]]
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer bottom]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-inside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer inside]]
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-outside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer outside]]
|}
=Characteristics=
* {{H:cushioning}}. The Tracer does not have the massive cushioning that has made Hoka famous and justifiably popular. The midsole foam is a more conventional thickness of 21/24mm fore/rear, which is closer to the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]'s 22/26mm than the [[Hoka Clifton]]'s 31/36mm or the [[Hoka Bondi]]'s massive 41/45mm. The midsole foam is also rather firmer than a traditional Hoka shoe, which results in a reasonable but uninspiring level of cushioning. However, the Tracer is also fairly light at only 7.4oz (in my size 10), so it's cushioning-to-weight ratio is again reasonable but uninspiring. It's surprisingly close to the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] both in terms of weight and cushioning. The Tracer has two different densities of foam; the white foam in the picture above is a little softer than the red foam by about 20%. The idea is to give a softer shoe in the heel, but a firmer more responsive cushioning in the forefoot. This often happens in a running shoe due to the drop, which means the cushioning is thicker in the heel the forefoot. If you want a shoe that is cushioned in the heel and firmer in the forefoot, but want to avoid running in high heels, then this is a nice option. . My quantitive analysis of the cushioning suggests that it's less than 10% difference, and in practice was rarely aware of it. It's only when swapping to a different shoe mid-run, or wearing a different shoe on each foot, that the difference becomes clear. Even then, it's not a huge difference, though I could tell a slight difference compared with the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]].<br/>[[File:KinvaraTracer.jpg|right|thumb|500px| His me testing the Tracer on one foot with the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] on the other. I would recommend doing this very often, and it's a recipe for injury. (That's a [[MilestonePod]] you can see on the Kinvara.)]]
* {{H:drop}}'''. '''The Tracer only has 2mm drop, which is effectively zero-drop.
* {{H:structure}}. The Tracer uses two different densities of foam, with the firmer foam in the forefoot. There is some overlap of the two types of foam as you can see in the photographs above. The denser rate of foam comes up further back on the inside of the shoe creating a slight [[Pronation| medial post]]. Practice, I couldn't detect any additional firmness on the inside of the heel, and I don't believe that it will interfere with your biomechanics. There is only a slight rise under the arch, so this is unlikely to irritate or calls planter fasciitis. The Tracer runs smoothly and neutrally, and I never felt it interfered with my stride.
* {{H:flexibility}}. The Tracer has a reasonable flexibility, and is about what you'd expect given the forefoot thickness. Yet again it's remarkably similar to the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] , but I guess that's what you'd expect given they have similar thicknesses of similar foam and relatively little outsole.
* {{H:outsole}}. Talking of outsole, the Tracer has a few patches of hard rubber under the main contact points. You can see the hard rubber in the pictures above as the black and yellow patches on the underside of the Tracer. The two colors of rubber appear to have similar densities and I found them reasonably hard wearing.
* {{H:shape}}. The Tracer appears to be a much narrower shoe than a typical Hoka. However, closer inspection reveals that this is an optical illusion. If you look at the images below you will see that the midsole of the Clifton extends horizontally further out from the upper than the Tracer. This gives the appearance that the Tracer is a much narrower shoe, but in reality they are almost identical in shape. Sadly, this is not the shape of the human foot, so I strongly recommend that you [[Shoe Dissection| cut open the toe box of any Hokas]]. {{H:TryCuttingShoes}}
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is largely seamless, with moderate breathability. Like most modern running shoes the only seam is where the unpadded forefoot transitions to the slightly offended heel. The Tracer has a few small overlays in the forefoot, but a solid overlay in the rear that limits breathability. The upper consists of a thicker woven material that has many holes that, each about quarter inch/5 mm in diameter covered by a fine mesh. The padding in the rear is reasonably effective, and I found the ankle opening to be quite comfortable. There is more padding than in the [[Hoka Clayton]] and it's a little more comfortable, though it's not up to the comfort of the[[Hoka Clifton| Hoka Clifton 2]]. <br/>[[File:TracerUpper.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| Here you can see the upper that I cut away. This is a view from the inside, and you can see the thicker yellow woven material with the red mesh behind.]]
* {{H:tongue}}. The Tracer has a tongue that is sown in the inside (medial), but a traditional disconnected tongue on the outside (lateral). I found that it stayed in place perfectly well, and it's surprisingly well padded.
* {{H:lacing}}. The Tracer uses thin flat laces which stay tied, and appear to be the same laces that Hoka is using in several of their recent shoes.
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Tracer has quite a firm [[Heel Counter]], as well as a rather thick overlay the rear of the shoe. This didn't cause me any problems, but is a waste of time, money, and weight.
{| class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerClifton2Shape.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| This is a view of the Tracer and the [[Hoka Clifton| Clifton 2]] showing the shape of the forefoot. You can see that my toes extend roughly equally in both shoes, and the upper feels the same. ]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerCliftonInsole.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| You have to look very closely at this image, but this is the Tracer insole placed over the top of the Clifton insole. If you look closely, and you may have to click for a larger image, you will see that they are nearly identical in shape.]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerCliftonCompared.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| Here are both shoes with their insoles removed for comparison. Hopefully you can see how close the shoes are in shape.]]
|}
{{FastBlr|hoka-one-one/Tracer-2-1062|1062|Hoka Tracer}}
{{ShoeGraphs}}
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
{{:Shoes-include}}
The Hoka Tracer builds on the success of the wonderful [[Hoka Clifton]]. The Clifton is one of the best selling shoes, and I feel the Tracer is remarkably close in its function and design. Both shoes have stunning cushioning for their weight, with the Tracer coming in about an ounce lighter than the Clifton, but with slightly less cushioning. Using the [[RMAT]] foam as the outsole material works rather well, and I think the Tracer shows Hoka's growing maturity with this advanced material. Their initial attempts to make a shoe using [[RMAT]] for the midsole produced a heavy and hard shoe that seemed remarkably pointless to me. However, they found that [[RMAT]] has great grip on a wide variety of surfaces, and makes an outstanding outsole as it combines this grip with better cushioning than a traditional rubber and better wear characteristics than an exposed midsole. They've used [[RMAT]] to great effect on the [[Hoka Mafate]] and my favorite hiking boots, the [[Hoka Tor Ultra]]. When you run in the Tracer it feels a lot like the Clifton (both the first and second versions), though I found the upper to be slightly less comfortable. My main quibble with the Tracer is in the shape of the toe box, but this is a problem with virtually every running shoe on the market. I have some minor concerns with the way the midsole extends out from the outside edge of the forefoot, as noted below under "structure". The Tracer is rather pricy, so if you're after something with similar cushioning, for less money and with less weight then check out the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]. Overall the Tracer is an outstanding shoe, and I've rated it as "The Best of the Best." {{H:WhatToLookForInShoes}}
{| class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-top.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer top]]
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-bottom.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer bottom]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-inside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer inside]]
|[[File:Hoka Tracer-outside.JPG|none|thumb|250px|Hoka Tracer outside]]
|}
=Characteristics=
* {{H:cushioning}}. The Tracer does not have the massive cushioning that has made Hoka famous and justifiably popular. The midsole foam is a more conventional thickness of 21/24mm fore/rear, which is closer to the [[Asics Gel Hyper Speed]]'s 22/26mm than the [[Hoka Clifton]]'s 31/36mm or the [[Hoka Bondi]]'s massive 41/45mm. The midsole foam is also rather firmer than a traditional Hoka shoe, which results in a reasonable but uninspiring level of cushioning. However, the Tracer is also fairly light at only 7.4oz (in my size 10), so it's cushioning-to-weight ratio is again reasonable but uninspiring. It's surprisingly close to the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] both in terms of weight and cushioning. The Tracer has two different densities of foam; the white foam in the picture above is a little softer than the red foam by about 20%. The idea is to give a softer shoe in the heel, but a firmer more responsive cushioning in the forefoot. This often happens in a running shoe due to the drop, which means the cushioning is thicker in the heel the forefoot. If you want a shoe that is cushioned in the heel and firmer in the forefoot, but want to avoid running in high heels, then this is a nice option. . My quantitive analysis of the cushioning suggests that it's less than 10% difference, and in practice was rarely aware of it. It's only when swapping to a different shoe mid-run, or wearing a different shoe on each foot, that the difference becomes clear. Even then, it's not a huge difference, though I could tell a slight difference compared with the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]].<br/>[[File:KinvaraTracer.jpg|right|thumb|500px| His me testing the Tracer on one foot with the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] on the other. I would recommend doing this very often, and it's a recipe for injury. (That's a [[MilestonePod]] you can see on the Kinvara.)]]
* {{H:drop}}'''. '''The Tracer only has 2mm drop, which is effectively zero-drop.
* {{H:structure}}. The Tracer uses two different densities of foam, with the firmer foam in the forefoot. There is some overlap of the two types of foam as you can see in the photographs above. The denser rate of foam comes up further back on the inside of the shoe creating a slight [[Pronation| medial post]]. Practice, I couldn't detect any additional firmness on the inside of the heel, and I don't believe that it will interfere with your biomechanics. There is only a slight rise under the arch, so this is unlikely to irritate or calls planter fasciitis. The Tracer runs smoothly and neutrally, and I never felt it interfered with my stride.
* {{H:flexibility}}. The Tracer has a reasonable flexibility, and is about what you'd expect given the forefoot thickness. Yet again it's remarkably similar to the [[Saucony Kinvara| Saucony Kinvara 7]] , but I guess that's what you'd expect given they have similar thicknesses of similar foam and relatively little outsole.
* {{H:outsole}}. Talking of outsole, the Tracer has a few patches of hard rubber under the main contact points. You can see the hard rubber in the pictures above as the black and yellow patches on the underside of the Tracer. The two colors of rubber appear to have similar densities and I found them reasonably hard wearing.
* {{H:shape}}. The Tracer appears to be a much narrower shoe than a typical Hoka. However, closer inspection reveals that this is an optical illusion. If you look at the images below you will see that the midsole of the Clifton extends horizontally further out from the upper than the Tracer. This gives the appearance that the Tracer is a much narrower shoe, but in reality they are almost identical in shape. Sadly, this is not the shape of the human foot, so I strongly recommend that you [[Shoe Dissection| cut open the toe box of any Hokas]]. {{H:TryCuttingShoes}}
* {{H:upper}}. The upper is largely seamless, with moderate breathability. Like most modern running shoes the only seam is where the unpadded forefoot transitions to the slightly offended heel. The Tracer has a few small overlays in the forefoot, but a solid overlay in the rear that limits breathability. The upper consists of a thicker woven material that has many holes that, each about quarter inch/5 mm in diameter covered by a fine mesh. The padding in the rear is reasonably effective, and I found the ankle opening to be quite comfortable. There is more padding than in the [[Hoka Clayton]] and it's a little more comfortable, though it's not up to the comfort of the[[Hoka Clifton| Hoka Clifton 2]]. <br/>[[File:TracerUpper.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| Here you can see the upper that I cut away. This is a view from the inside, and you can see the thicker yellow woven material with the red mesh behind.]]
* {{H:tongue}}. The Tracer has a tongue that is sown in the inside (medial), but a traditional disconnected tongue on the outside (lateral). I found that it stayed in place perfectly well, and it's surprisingly well padded.
* {{H:lacing}}. The Tracer uses thin flat laces which stay tied, and appear to be the same laces that Hoka is using in several of their recent shoes.
* {{H:heelcounter}}. The Tracer has quite a firm [[Heel Counter]], as well as a rather thick overlay the rear of the shoe. This didn't cause me any problems, but is a waste of time, money, and weight.
{| class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerClifton2Shape.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| This is a view of the Tracer and the [[Hoka Clifton| Clifton 2]] showing the shape of the forefoot. You can see that my toes extend roughly equally in both shoes, and the upper feels the same. ]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerCliftonInsole.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| You have to look very closely at this image, but this is the Tracer insole placed over the top of the Clifton insole. If you look closely, and you may have to click for a larger image, you will see that they are nearly identical in shape.]]
|- valign="top"
|[[File:TracerCliftonCompared.jpg|none|thumb|x300px| Here are both shoes with their insoles removed for comparison. Hopefully you can see how close the shoes are in shape.]]
|}
{{FastBlr|hoka-one-one/Tracer-2-1062|1062|Hoka Tracer}}
{{ShoeGraphs}}
=A Comparison with other Recommended Shoes=
{{:Shoes-include}}
