8,160
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
no edit summary
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) scales use an imperceptible electrical signal to calculate the amount of water in the body and thus estimate body fat. BIA compares the electrical resistance of a direct current to an alternating current. The direct current does not penetrate the cell walls whereas the alternating current does. This creates a difference that allows an estimate of extracellular water.
==Two or Four Electrodes==
BIA scales either have two electrodes that measure from the feet, or four electrodes that measure from both the hands and the feet. You can see in the images below the path electricity takes with scales that measure via feet only compared with when measurements are from the hands and feet. I would not recommend any BIA scales that measure from the feet only. There are also [http://www.amazon.com/Omron-Logic-Monitor-HBF-306C-Silver/dp/B00006WNPU BIA devices that measure from the arms only], but these suffer from similar problems. <jfs id="B00006WNPU" noreferb="true"/>
{| class="wikitable"
|- valign="top"
|[[File:Human Figure Full.jpg|none|thumb|300px|The path taken by body fat scales that measure from the hands and feet.]]
|}
==Segmental==
Most body fat scales treat the body is a single cylinder with uniform resistance. Unfortunately, because the arms and legs are thinner than the trunk they contributed disproportionate amount of resistance. Typically arms and legs are about 5 to 20% of body weight, but form about half of the overall resistance, while the trunk contains 50% of the body mass and contribute only 5 to 10% of the overall resistance. A segmental scale on the other hand, segments the body up into five cylinders, two for the arms to for the legs and one for the trunk, giving higher accuracy.
==Single or Dual Frequency==
Body fat scales use a small, high frequency electrical signal to estimate body fat. It's been known for some time that using more than one frequency can improve accuracy, but consumer grade scales did not support dual frequency until 2017. Typically , the alternating current is around 50 kHz, with dual frequency scales adding in 6.25 kHz for improved accuracy. Single frequency scales generally treat the body is a single cylinder with uniform resistance. Unfortunately because the arms and legs are thinner than the trunk they contributed disproportionate amount of resistance. Typically arms and legs are about 5 to 20% of body weight, but form about half of the overall resistance, while the trunk contains 50% of the body mass and contribute only 5 to 10% of the overall resistance. Dual frequency scales on the other hand segment the body up into five cylinders, two for the arms to for the legs and one for the trunk, giving much higher accuracy. While more expensive, these dual frequency segmental scales are more useful.
=Accuracy Issues=
Hydration can have a significant impact on the reading, so readings need to be taken at the same time of day with the same level of hydration. The [[Book Review - The 4 Hour Body|4 Hour Body]] recommends drinking 1.5 liters (3 pints) of water, waiting 30 minutes, urinating and then taking a measurement. I have found that with the whole body scales I can simply measure when I wake in the morning and I get a consistent enough reading to not require this hydration procedure. The biggest problem for an athlete is that BIA is particularly inaccurate when fat free mass, including [[Glycogen]], changes<ref name="BIA1"/><ref name="BIA2"/>. I've noticed that the day after a long run, the scales claim a much larger loss of body fat than is reasonable. Studies have shown that obesity is underestimated with many body fat scales.
==Optimizing Accuracy==
My approach to optimizing my scales accuracy is average and calibrate. My Tanita BC-601 scales offer several activity levels, so I find the level that matches a more accurate body fat measurement such as a [[DEXA| DEXA Scan]]. I then use an average of a week's readings to even out any hydration errors.
==Posture and Accuracy==
With BIA scales it's important to get the posture just right, as even small variations in the position of your arms can make a significant change to the reading. You must hold the handset with your arms at 90° with your elbows straight.
|}
=Recommended Scales=
I have tried a number of scales over the years and I believe the Omron HBF-510 is the best value for money, but the Tanita Segmental scales may worth the extra cost for their improved accuracy. I would avoid any scale that only measures via your feet. ==Best Value - Omron HBF-510516==The [http://www.amazon.com/Omron-HBF-510W-Composition-Monitor-Scale/dp/B001IV61J4 Omron HBF-510], which retails for about $60-$65 516 offers great value for money and are one of the cheapest BIA scales that measure from the hands and feet. It's not segmental, so you only get an overall body fat estimate, and it's only single frequency, but it's really cheap. In fact, it's cheaper than a lot of feet-only body fat scales, though unlike the other Tanita scales here, they are it's not dual frequency or segmentalFDA approved. There's no recording of the data, so you'd need to write down the results to track your weight and fitness. There's a 180-day memory, so at least you wouldn't have to do that every day, but I'd still recommend transferring the data to something that will graph your data. <jfs id="B001803OS6" noreferb=Cheapest Segmental "true"/>. Omron makes a few variants of this scale, such as the HBF- Tanita FitScan BC514C <jfs id="B0020MMCDE" noreferb="true"/> (90 day memory), HBF-601F510W <jfs id=" B001IV61J4" noreferb="true"/> (white, no memory). The [[httpFile://wwwOmron HBF-516.amazon.com/jpg|center|thumb|300px|]]==Segmental - Tanita-FitScan-BC-601F-Segmental-Composition/dp/B006QYDMC2 601FS==The BC-601F] is one of the cheaper Tanita single-frequency, segmental BIA scales at around $260. However, this scale does not and it will record the your data for easy transfer to a PConto an SD card. This is more of far less convenient than a problem with Smartphone app, but it's a segmental scale as there is far more data availablelot better than writing things down each day. ==SD Storage - Tanita BC-601<jfs id="B016APIYQK" noreferb="true"/>.The [[httpFile://www.amazon.co.uk/Tanita-BC601-Innerscan-Segmental-Composition/dp/B0037252RY Tanita FitScan BC-601601FS.jpg|center|thumb|300px|]] available in Europe and writes the measurements to a flash memory card for direct transfer to computer, which I find invaluable. ==Wireless The Best – Tanita BCRD-1500545IM==The [http://wwwTanita RD-545IM is the first consumer grade dual frequency segmental scale.amazonThe dual frequency gives increased accuracy, and the RD-545IM even claims to estimate Muscle Quality and measure resting heart rate.com/BCUnfortunately, the RD-1500-Ironman-Wireless-Segmental-Composition/dp/B006OQO6MW BC-1500] does 545IM is not have a built in displayyet released, but wirelessly transmits the data to a PC which is ideal, especially if you combine it with the optional should be available soon. [[httpFile://wwwRD-545IM.amazon.com/jpg|center|thumb|300px|]]==Comparison Table=={| class="wikitable" ! ! Omron MBF-516! Tanita BC-601FS! TanitaRD-545IM|-| Whole body| Yes| Yes| Yes|-D| Segmental| No| Yes| Yes|-1000| Dual Frequency| No| No| Yes|-Tabletop| Capacity| 330 Lb| 330 Lb| 440 Lb|-Display| Weight| Yes| Yes| Yes|-BC| BMI| Yes| No| Yes|-1000/dp/B004MEX9UI D| Body Fat %| Yes| Yes| Yes|-1000 display]. However, the scale is $620 and the optional display is $75, so this is an expensive option. ==Not Recommended | Muscle Mass| Yes| Yes| Yes|- Withings WiFi Scales==The [http://www.amazon.com/Withings| Water %| No| Yes| Yes|-WS| Bone Mass| No| Yes| Yes|-50| Visceral Fat| Yes| Yes| Yes|-Smart| Fat % per limb| No| Yes| Yes|-Analyzer| Muscle Mass per limb| No| Yes| Yes|-Black/dp/B00BKRQ4E8 Withings body fat scale] is Wi| Muscle Quality| No| No| Yes|-Fi enabled and provides a direct upload to the Internet where it can be viewed on any web browser. This makes it easy to visualize and track the changes in your weight and body fat. Unfortunately the scales only measure between the feet, and so their body fat accuracy is too limited to recommend.| Data recording| Memory| SD Card| Smartphone App|}
=References=
<references>
