8,146
edits
Changes
From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
no edit summary
| style="background-color: #E4E483;" |4
| {{Garmin 620 without HRM}}
|-
| [[Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Vivoactive Review]]
| style="background-color: #FDD27F;" |13
| style="background-color: #FDCA7D;" |3
| style="background-color: #FBAA77;" |1
| style="background-color: #FFEB84;" |2
| style="background-color: #63BE7B;" |5
| style="background-color: #FFEB84;" |2
| style="background-color: #C3DA81;" |6
| {{Garmin Vivoactive without HRM}}
|-
| [[Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive HR Review]]
| style="background-color: #FEEB84;" |3
| {{Garmin Vivoactive HR}}
|-
| [[Garmin Fenix 2| Garmin Fenix 2 Review]]
| style="background-color: #FBA676;" |1
| {{Polar M400 Without HRM}}
|-
| [[Suunto Spartan Ultra | Suunto Spartan Ultra Review]]
| style="background-color: #F98971;" |4
| style="background-color: #F8696B;" |0
| style="background-color: #F8696B;" |0
| style="background-color: #CCDD82;" |3
| style="background-color: #FBAA77;" |1
| style="background-color: #F8696B;" |0
| style="background-color: #F8786E;" |0
| This is not the watch you're looking for.
|-
| [[Epson SF-510| Epson SF-510 Review]]
| style="background-color: #F8696B;" |0
| {{Garmin 10 without HRM}}
|}
The score is the sum of how well each watch can answer the four basic questions (how far, how fast, where are you, what's your cadence), plus some bonus points. I give 1-2 bonus points for application support and 1-2 bonus points for Optical Heart Rate Monitoring. Value for money is the score divided by the price (at the time I last updated the table.) Your needs may be different, so you might weight the different aspects of the watches differently, or be basing your decision on different criteria totally. Hopefully this table will give you a good starting point for your decision. (Older Reviews: [[Polar RC3 GPS]], [[Soleus 1.0]], [[Motorola Motoactv]].)
