Changes

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search

Shoes

2,887 bytes added, 21:08, 5 May 2014
no edit summary
* '''Weight'''. The weight of a shoe makes a big difference in the [[Running Economy| energy cost of running]]. Even small changes in weight can make a big difference in how fast we run.
* '''Drop'''. The drop is difference in sole thickness between the forefoot and heel. Larger drops can interfere with natural running form, and may increase the probability of [[Foot Strike| heel strike]].
=Shoe Dissection =I've cut many of my shoes in half to reveal their construction.{| class="wikitable" |- valign="top"|[[File:ShoeHalfsHokaSlice.JPG|none|thumb|500pxx300px|A comparison of various shoes cut in half to reveal their sole. The Hoka is the original Minimax shoe, the Bondi. ]]|[[File:OlympusSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Altra Olympus.]]|- valign="top"|[[File:GTSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Asics is a traditional shoe, the GT]]|[[File:FreeSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Nike Free and ]]|- valign="top"|[[File:PureSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Brooks Pure are transitional shoes and the ]]|[[File:HattoriSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Saucony Hattori is minimalist. You can see the radical difference in sole thickness between the shoes]]|- valign="top"|[[File:GoRunSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Skechers GO Run Ultra]] |}
=What Style?=
There are pros and cons of each style of shoe, from Minimalist to Minimax.
| style="background-color: #CCFFFF;" |9.5oz
| style="background-color: #CCFFFF;" |14 mm (10mm without insole)
| style="background-color: #CCFFFF;" |2726/41mm 40mm (2524/35mm 34mm without insole)
| style="background-color: #CCFFFF;" |9.5 (heel)
| style="background-color: #CCFFFF;" |Road
* New Balance Fresh Foam 980 has less of a drop than a traditional shoe, but it's too firm to be a true Minimax trainer.
==Altra Olympus==
[[File:AltraOlympusOlympusSlice.jpegJPG|none|thumb|200pxx300px|The Altra Olympusdissected.]]
This has rapidly become one of my favorite running shoes. It has the soft cushioning that is like the best of the Hoka range, combined with zero drop and a nice wide toe box. It's remarkably flexible given its cushioning, with an outsole that works well on the road. Like the Hokas, the cushioning means the shoe works well on rocky trails as well. Like other Altra shoes, the tongue area is wider than most shoes, reducing the pressure on the top of your foot. The weight is similar to a Hoka, but somehow feels lighter than a Hoka when I'm running. Like the Hokas, the midsole thins at the front and back to create a rocker effect, and this is a little more noticeable than the Hokas. I felt this worked well, though I've talked to runners who have found the rocker a little disconcerting.
==Hokas==
{{Main|Hoka Shoe Review}}
[[File:HokaHalfs.JPG|rightnone|thumb|300px|The Hoka Bondi cut in half, showing the outside and inside views. You can see that the midsole foam is a lot higher on the outside than the inside.]]
The Hoka shoes started the 'Minimum Drop, Maximum Cushioning' style of shoe and are still unique in their level of cushioning. The Hokas generally use extremely soft foam, with a wide base to improve stability. Their soles are thicker than most other shoes in this category, so they are quite heavy, though not as heavy as they look. Most of the Hokas do well on both asphalt and rocky trails, though the Mafate is designed for softer trails and does not like asphalt. The Hokas provide remarkable protection from rough trail surfaces, and the thick, soft soles mold themselves around stones to provide more grip on rocky trails than you'd expect. Other than the sole, the Hoka is a poor design, with a remarkably tight toe box and they are typically rather inflexible.
* The Bondi is my favorite all round Hoka. The toe box is tight, even for a Hoka, but it's got the best balance of soft cushioning and reasonable weight. There is also the Bondi Speed/[http://www.zappos.com/hoka-one-one-bondi-evo-brilliant-blue-hi-rise-citrus Bondi Evo] that is quite similar, as is the Stinson.
These shoes are not quite 'minimum drop, maximum cushioning' of the Minimax category, but they're thicker than most shoes and tend to have less drop.
==Skechers GOrun Ultra==
{| class="wikitable" |- valign="top"|[[File:GoRunSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|A slice through the GOrun ultras.]]|[[File:SkechersGoRunUltraGoRunPressure.jpgJPG|none|thumb|200pxx300px|Here's a close up with my foot in the slice. The Skechers GOrun Ultraarrows give an idea of where the pressure points are under the ball and heel of the foot. Here you can see the sole thickening in front of the heel, creating a 'medial post'.]]|- valign="top"|[[File:GORunAnkle.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|A close up of the ankle, where you can see the foam that holds the shoe against the back of the ankle.]]|[[File:GORunAnkle2.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|Here's the closeup with my ankle, and the blue arrow points to where the shoe presses on the heel bone (calcaneus) and the calcanean bursa. The red arrow points to the Achilles' tendon, which is where most shoes press. ]]|- valign="top"|[[File:GORunSole.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|A close up of the sole, showing the wear that occurred after just 130 miles.]]|}Is this a Hoka for only $80? Sadly not, but it's closer than you might expect, though the cost per mile probably works out more than the longer lasting Hokas.* '''Cushioning'''. The GOrun Ultra is massively cushioned in the heel; it's as thick as the thicker Hokas, but softer. However, the forefoot is not as thickfar thinner. * '''Protection'''. The GOrun offers little protection compared with other Minimax shoes. This is partly because the forefoot is relatively thin and partly because of the large foam lugs. If you hit a stone between the lugs the forefoot is only 22mm (with insole). If the stone hits on the gap in the red foam, which makes you'd only have about 17mm of remarkably soft foam. Ouch. * '''Drop'''. The drop with the drop insole is 14mm, making it worse than a traditional running shoe. If you take the insole out, the drop is reduced to 10mm, which is not quite as bad, though slightly more than a traditional shoe. However, if you look at the picture above, you'll notice the cut outs in the red foam around the forefoot, which makes the drop seem worse as the forefoot is softer and more compressible. ** Note that the measurements published by Skechers indicate the drop is 8mm with the insole and 4mm without the insole. I've also seen the measurements of 23/27mm sole height quoted by third parties. However, an independent measurement is 27/41mm with the insole, 25/35mm without, which close to my measurement. I took my measurement from under the ball and heel of the foot using the slice seen above. * '''Medial post'''. The construction of the sole is a little odd, becoming thicker just in front and to the inside of your heel. This creates what is sometimes called a medial post, which is intended to resist the natural roll of your foot as it lands. * '''Feel'''. I found the combination of the medial post and the large drop rather disconcerting, and while the heel is nicely cushioned, the forefoot feels rather poor. I've run a few miles with a GOrun Ultra on one foot and a Hoka Bondi on the other (don't do that at home), and the shoes feel remarkably superficially similar. * '''Heel counter'''. The forefoot heel counter on this shoe is rather different to other shoes, putting almost no pressure on the Achilles' tendon. Instead the heel counter presses on the back of the GOrun is noticeably thinner heel bone, which feels rather odd initially, and offers far less protection from stones than when running faster it felt like the BondiGORun Ultras would come off. However, it's possible that this shoe may work better if you are having Achilles' Tendon issues. * '''Wear'''. Shoes that lack the hard rubber outsole layer always wear more quickly, but the GORun Ultra's have lugs that wear even quicker than others. If found noticeable wear after only 130 miles. * '''Injury. '''I found that I started to develop knee pain during the time I was trying out these shoes, even though I was only running short distances in them. The knee pain disappeared after I ceased using the GORun ultras. This could be coincidence of course, but it does concern me. The GOrun has most of the softness and comfort of the Hoka, so overall this is not at a bad shoe given the far lower purchase price. However, and well worth considering. (Note that the measurements published by Skechers indicate the sole is an 8mm I have some concerns with amount of drop with the insole and 4mm without the insole. I've also seen rapid wear that undermines the measurements of 23/27mm sole height quoted by third partiescost advantage. However, an independent measurement is 27/41mm with the insole, 25/35mm without, which matches up with my informal measurement.)
==Adidas Energy Boost==
[[File:adidas-energy-boost.jpg|none|thumb|200px|The [http://www.runningwarehouse.com/adidas_Energy_Boost/descpageMRS-AENBM1.htmlhttp:/www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/ADI1674ADI1702/mens-adidas-energy-boost-2/brproductcrosssell/ Adidas Energy Boost].]]The [http://www.runningwarehouse.com/adidas_Energy_Boost/descpageMRS-AENBM1.htmlhttp:/www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/ADI1674ADI1702/mens-adidas-energy-boost-2/brproductcrosssell/ Adidas Energy Boost] has a new material in the midsole (see 'Adidas Boost Foam' below) which changes how this shoe feels. The Boost does not really count as a minimalist shoe or a Minimax shoe, as it has a mainstream design, with the typical raised heel and cushioning that is no thicker than normal. However, because the boost foam works so well, it works far better than you'd expect.
* As a Minimax. Though it's not as thick as a Minimax shoe, it's soft cushioning makes it feel much thicker than it actually is, and it's a lot softer than something like the Brooks Transcend. While it does not offer the protection of a Hoka, it does offer a lot of the feeling of soft cushioning.
* As a minimalist. If you take out the insole, you also lose quite a bit of the higher heel and have something that's close to a minimalist shoe. I estimate that the insole is about 3mm in the forefoot and 5mm at the heel. Without that extra, the shoe is a 7mm drop (14mm/21mm). The shoe is light weight, and the new foam is pleasant under foot, combining a forefoot that had good ground feel with reasonable protection.
==Mizuno Cursoris==
[[File:Cursoris.jpg|none|thumb|200px|The [http://www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/MIZ752/ Cursoris].]]
The [http://www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/MIZ752/ Cursoris] is a light shoe with a soft sole, almost as soft as the Hokas, but only half the thickness so overall the cushioning is less. The Cursoris is clearly a road shoe, with little protection from stones, and no outsole grip. The toe box is the biggest and best designed of any shoe I've tried, even better than the Altra's. The upper is soft, which some people find strange and can result in them being over tightened. Once you get used to the feeling that they're barely there, they stay in place well. However, they wear as quickly as you might expect, so the cost per mile is quite high. <br style="clear: both" />
==Altra Torin==
[[File:Torin.jpg|none|thumb|200px|The [http://www.zappos.com/altra-zero-drop-footwear-the-torin-black-green Torin].]]
I've included a couple of traditional running shoes, mostly for comparison.
==Asics ==
[[File:GTSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x300px|A dissection of the Asics GT.]]
The [http://www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/ASC1638/mens-asics-gt2000-2/ Asics GT 2000] has been around for many years in one form or another, a reflection of its popularity. The GT 2000 series could be considered one of the best "average" running shoes, and it is often used as the starting point when a new runner is looking for their first shoes. The original GT 2000 was introduced back in 1995 and has been updated many times. (They did add 10 to the number every year until the 2170, then reverted to 2000 and added a version number.) So I've included the GT 2000 here partly as a good starting point for those looking for a traditional running shoe and partly as the shoe that is probably closest to the average running shoe.
==Brooks Transcend==
These are not zero drop, but they have less drop than a traditional shoe, are lightweight and flexible.
==Nike Free==
{| class="wikitable" |- valign="top"|[[File:Free30v4.jpg|none|thumb|200pxx200px|The (unmodified) Nike Free 3.0 Flynit.]]|[[File:FreeSlice.JPG|none|thumb|x200px|Nike Free]]|}
Nike Free are running shoes that are light weight, with very flexible soles. Even without modification, the Nike Free 3.0 is a good minimalist running shoe and a half way house to a zero drop shoe. There is no outer sole (the hard rubber that meets the road), just a robust midsole (the cushioning part). The midsole has deep groves cut into it to allow the shoe to flex more than is possible with a traditional shoe. There are lots of different models of Nike Free, but I would recommend using the [http://www.roadrunnersports.com/rrs/products/NIK1654/mens-nike-free-flyknit-30/ Free 3.0] flynit. (Most Frees have a number that indicates how flexible they are. The idea is that 10.0 would be a traditional shoe and 1.0 would be barefoot.)
<br style="clear: both" />

Navigation menu