Changes

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Jump to: navigation, search

New Balance RC5000v2

11 bytes added, 00:37, 20 July 2016
no edit summary
* {{H:tongue}}. The RC5000vc2 has a traditional tongue that is has a tab to attach it to the laces. The tongue is thin and unpadded, but I didn't find it uncomfortable.
* {{H:lacing}}. The RC5000v2 has traditional flat laces that are a bit thinner than most, probably to save weight. I found that they stayed tied more easily than most shoelaces I've tried.
* {{H:heelcounter}}. Not surprisingly, there is no real heel counter [[Heel Counter]] in this shoe. There is a tiny tab that sticks up from the back of the heel, but nothing else. I find it interesting to run in a shoe without the heel counter[[Heel Counter]], and I believe it emphasizes how useless they are and how much better off we'd be without them.
{{FastBlr|new-balance/rc5000-v1-852|852|New Balance RC5000 v2}}
=How Far Can I Run in the RC5000v2? =
Different runners want different levels of cushioning, so this shoe may not suit everyone. Some runners want a [[MinimaxMaximalist]] shoe when they run a 5K, while others will run a 100 mile race barefoot. Most people find that as the distance increases, they want a little more cushioning to protect their feet from the pounding and to offset a little of the fatigue that sets in over time. You can see from the charts below how the cushioning compares with other shoes I've tested for some comparisons. Remember that a thicker, firmer shoe would have the same cushioning rating as a thinner, softer shoe, but would feel rather different. I've run the marathon distance in the RC5000v2, but I might want more cushioning for a road 50-mile race depending on how fast I was intending to be. If I wanted to run my best to time in the marathon, I'd probably go for the slightly lighter original RC5000, but this would be a candidate.
=Comparisons=
Here are some direct comparisons with its potential competition.

Navigation menu