Garmin Vivoactive Review

From Fellrnr.com, Running tips
Revision as of 13:51, 11 January 2016 by User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:Garmin Vivoactive Review}} The {{Garmin Vivoactive}} is the cheapest watch to support Garmin's Connect IQ, and the current pricing puts it into the budget c...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Garmin Vivoactive is the cheapest watch to support Garmin's Connect IQ, and the current pricing puts it into the budget category of running watches. So far I've got mixed feelings about the Vivoactive; it's a mixture of generally crippled functionality, poor GPS Accuracy, no Pace From A Footpod, but it's small, fairly cheap, has some surprising extra functionality, and it has a nice user interface. (I'm still testing the Vivoactive, so this is just my initial impressions, not a full review.)

1 Pros

The Vivoactive has a reasonable size color display given its small dimensions, though the bezel is larger than you might expect from the latest watches. The resolution of 30K pixels makes it look sharp and clear. The colors are pretty good, and color does make a watch more appealing even if it doesn't add much to the functionality. The standard watch face is quite uninspiring; it makes me think Garmin intentionally set the bar low for developers of custom watch face apps.
Vivoactive (6).JPG
The Vivoactive supports Garmin's Connect IQ that allows for various apps to be installed, including this custom watch face called "Actiface". I love this display, which shows a lot of data in a small space. There is a graph of the last week's steps and calories, a circular progress bar for today's progress towards you step goal, plus some badges for things like hitting your step goal for four days in the last week. The Vivoactive supports Connect IQ for Watch faces, Apps, Widgets, and Data Fields. It includes most device profiles: Heat rate, footpod, temperature, cadence, speed, controls, and power meter.
Vivoactive (2).JPG
The Vivoactive menu is a little different to Garmin's Forerunner or outdoor ranges, but it works reasonably well. It's designed with a touch display in mind, so you can't operate it with just the buttons. This can be an issue when wearing gloves, but I've had no issues using the touch screen in the rain. In addition to the touch screen, there are two hard buttons, one on either side, and two touch buttons just below the screen.
Vivoactive (3).JPG
I'm a big fan of having Cadence alerts, which are easy to set up. I'm pleasantly surprised that this feature is included on a watch that has generally been crippled.
Vivoactive (20).JPG
Here's the cadence alert going off, along with a vibration.
Vivoactive (19).JPG
I was surprised to find the Vivoactive has support for Garmin's temperature sensing pod. This is something generally only found in their outdoor range. There's no built in thermometer, but I find they don't work well as your wrist is typically at a different temperature to the ambient air.
Vivoactive (8).JPG
The Vivoactive can be charged on the run, which makes is a candidate for ultrarunners. You have to set the Vivoactive (and some other Garmin watches) to "Garmin Mode" for it to work when charging the battery on the run, but once you do it works nicely.
Vivoactive Charge.jpg
Vivoactive (11).JPG
I rather like the ability to configure how long the vibration alerts buzz for. It's a small feature, but nice none the less.
Vivoactive (10).JPG
The Vivoactive has Garmin's standard display of activity tracking. It's rather uninspiring, showing the steps numerically and graphically, along with a guestimate of calories and distance.
Vivoactive (12).JPG
You can set repeating reminders for things like drinking or eating, as well as custom texts.
Vivoactive (21).JPG
There is simple "back to start" navigation on the Vivoactive, where it displays a directional arrow and distance to where you started the activity. The arrow is not a compass, so you need to be moving for it to point in the right direction.
Vivoactive (22).JPG
You can connect to Garmin Live Track, which will allow people to see your run as it progresses. This seems to work fine, and the Vivoactive will support Ant+ devices (HRM, etc.) while doing Live Track. I'm not entirely convinced by the usefulness of this; after all if you're carrying your smart phone, you could use that directly.
livetrack.jpg

2 Cons

It's too early for me to give details of the GPS accuracy, but my initial testing indicates it's rather poor.
Bridgevívoactive.jpg
There's support for a Footpod but sadly no support for Pace From A Footpod. This means that you won't get an accurate idea of your current pace, though it's possible that Garman might and this in a future firmware release.
Vivoactive (7).JPG
One of the more annoying bits of intentional crippling of the Vivoactive is limiting it to just three pages of data. This seems rather gratuitous and irksome; I realize that Garmin want to create differentiation across their model range by using software, but I find this a little egregious.
Vivoactive (17).JPG
Not only are you limited to three pages of data, each page has exactly three fields. I generally like to have four fields displayed, something the Vivoactive's display would handle easily enough. Occasionally I like to have a single field display so it's easier to read, either in low light conditions or when there's one big of data I need to focus on. This restriction to just three data fields as another bit of crippling.
Vivoactive (18).JPG
The Vivoactive gives no summary data when you've finished your run, another example of intentional crippling of the watch. A simple indication of time, distance, and pace would seem the least they could do. (You can access the details via the history menu.)
Vivoactive (1).JPG
To offset the lack of save summary slightly, the Vivoactive shows time, distance, and pace when paused.
Vivoactive (23).JPG
In an unusual bit of crippling, the Vivoactive can set its clock from your connected phone or manually, but not from the GPS signal.
Vivoactive (9).JPG

3 Smartwatch features

These features are quite common on smart watches, allowing you to get some basic information from your Bluetooth attached phone. Remember that these features are only available when your smart phone is in a Bluetooth range.

The find my phone option is useful to those of us that are absentminded and can never remember where we left it.
Vivoactive (4).JPG
Like other smartwatches, you can get your text messages displayed on the Vivoative when it's connected to your phone via Bluetooth.
Vivoactive (16).JPG
You can get weather details on the Vivoactive, but it needs a Bluetooth connection to the Garmin Connect app to function, so it just saves you the effort of unlocking your phone.
Vivoactive (13).JPG
You can control you phone's music playback. I prefer a dedicated music player, but I know many runners use their phone.
Vivoactive (14).JPG
You can access your smartphone's calendar, which some people might find useful. (I don't.)
Vivoactive (15).JPG

4 Comparison Table

I evaluate running watches in three distinct ways. Firstly, you can use a watch on its own, without any kind of Footpod. This is probably the most common way runners use their watch, but you miss out on a lot. The second rating is with a standard Footpod that is available quite cheaply. These Footpod's can be reasonably accurate once the calibrated, but calibration is a little tedious. The final evaluation is with the Stryd Footpod, which is vastly more accurate than any other type of Footpod, or and more accurate than GPS. The table below looks at the score, and the value for money of each watch for each of the three conditions. (I’ve also tested the Apple Watch 3, but I’ve not included it in these tables as it’s not really a running watch.)

Review With Stryd Score With Stryd Value for money With Footpod Score With Footpod Value for money Without Footpod Score Without Footpod Value for money Price at Amazon.com
Garmin Epix Review 47 4.5 31 3.9 23 3.4 Garmin Epix
Garmin Fenix 5X Review 47 2.9 32 2.3 24 1.9 Fenix 5X
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 45 3.8 28 3.1 24 3 Fenix 3
Garmin 935 Review 45 3.6 30 3 22 2.4 Garmin 935
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 40 4.9 21 3.8 17 3.8 Garmin Vivoactive HR
Garmin 920XT Review 39 4.4 30 4.7 24 4.5 Garmin 920XT without HRM
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 37 2.6 27 2.3 23 2.1 Suunto Spartan Ultra
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 36 4 19 2.9 15 2.8 Garmin Vivoactive 3
Garmin Vivoactive Review 34 5.1 14 3.4 10 3.3 Garmin Vivoactive
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 34 3.9 23 3.7 18 3.4 Suunto Spartan Trainer
Polar V800 Review 33 2.8 26 2.8 22 2.7 Polar V800 without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 Review 32 3.9 25 4.3 21 4.5 Suunto Ambit2
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 32 3.4 29 4.1 25 4.2 Suunto Ambit3 Peak
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 31 2.9 22 2.7 18 2.5 Garmin Fenix 2 without HRM
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 30 4 27 5.5 23 5.9 Suunto Ambit3 Run
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 30 3.5 23 3.8 19 3.8 Suunto Ambit2 R without HRM
Garmin 235 Review 28 2.9 20 2.8 12 2 Garmin 235
Garmin 620 Review 27 3.8 24 5.1 20 5.6 Garmin 620 without HRM
Garmin 910XT Review 26 3.9 26 6.1 21 6.7 Garmin 910XT without HRM
Garmin 310XT Review 25 4.6 24 8.3 18 10 Garmin 310XT without HRM
Polar M400 Review 25 4.3 15 4.5 11 4.9 Polar M400 without HRM
Garmin 225 Review 25 3.8 13 3.1 9 2.9 Garmin 225
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 25 3.3 10 2 10 2.5 TomTom Cardio Runner
Polar M430 Review 25 3.2 15 2.9 11 2.7 Polar M430 without HRM
Garmin 610 Review 24 3.3 20 4.3 14 3.9 Garmin 610 without HRM
Leikr Review 10 1 20 2.5 14 2 Leikr ($380)
Epson SF-510 Review 4 0.7 6 2 6 3 Epson SF-510
Epson SF-810 Review 4 0.6 6 1.6 6 2.3 Epson SF-810
Garmin 10 Review 2 0.3 2 0.6 2 0.9 Garmin 10 (Est.

The score is the sum of how well each watch can answer the four basic questions (how far, how fast, where are you, what's your cadence), plus some bonus points.

  1. The "How far you've run" will be based on GPS only for "without Footpod" and "with Standard Footpod", but based on Stryd if supported in the "with Stryd Footpod" table..
  2. How fast you're running assumes you're using a Footpod if it's supported, otherwise the rating is 0-2 based on GPS accuracy.
  3. The "Where are you?" is based on various navigation features such as back to start, breadcrumbs, and preloaded maps. For some watches, you have to turn GPS off to get the benefit of Stryd, so those watches have worse "where are you scores" with Stryd than without.
  4. The cadence score uses 1 point for an internal cadence sensor, 2 points for footpod support, 1 point for support from chest strap cadence, and 1 point for cadence alerts.
  5. I give 1-2 bonus points for application support, 1-2 bonus points for data upload, 1-2 bonus points for Optical Heart Rate Monitoring, and 0-1 bonus points for battery life.
  6. Value for money is the score divided by the price (at the time I last updated the table.) Your needs may be different, so you might weight the different aspects of the watches differently, or be basing your decision on different criteria totally. Hopefully this table will give you a good starting point for your decision.

4.1 Score Breakdown without a Footpod

Review Score Value for money6 How far did
you run?1
How fast are
you running?2
Where are
you?3
What's your
cadence?4
Bonus Points5 class="unsortable" |

Price at Amazon.com

Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 25 4.2 8 3 6 2 6 Suunto Ambit3 Peak
Garmin 920XT Review 24 4.5 1 2 7 6 8 Garmin 920XT without HRM
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 24 3 2 1 7 6 8 Fenix 3
Garmin Fenix 5X Review 24 1.9 1 0 9 6 8 Fenix 5X
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 23 5.9 8 3 5 2 5 Suunto Ambit3 Run
Garmin Epix Review 23 3.4 0 0 9 6 8 Garmin Epix
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 23 2.1 8 2 6 2 5 Suunto Spartan Ultra
Polar V800 Review 22 2.7 9 4 3 2 4 Polar V800 without HRM
Garmin 935 Review 22 2.4 1 0 7 6 8 Garmin 935
Garmin 910XT Review 21 6.7 5 3 6 2 5 Garmin 910XT without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 Review 21 4.5 4 3 6 2 6 Suunto Ambit2
Garmin 620 Review 20 5.6 3 2 2 6 7 Garmin 620 without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 19 3.8 4 3 5 2 5 Suunto Ambit2 R without HRM
Garmin 310XT Review 18 10 7 2 4 0 5 Garmin 310XT without HRM
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 18 3.4 5 3 4 2 4 Suunto Spartan Trainer
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 18 2.5 1 0 6 6 5 Garmin Fenix 2 without HRM
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 17 3.8 0 0 2 6 9 Garmin Vivoactive HR
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 15 2.8 0 0 4 4 7 Garmin Vivoactive 3
Garmin 610 Review 14 3.9 3 2 3 2 4 Garmin 610 without HRM
Leikr Review 14 2 5 2 4 0 3 Leikr ($380)
Garmin 235 Review 12 2 0 0 2 2 8 Garmin 235
Polar M400 Review 11 4.9 3 1 1 2 4 Polar M400 without HRM
Polar M430 Review 11 2.7 3 1 1 2 4 Polar M430 without HRM
Garmin Vivoactive Review 10 3.3 0 0 0 6 4 Garmin Vivoactive
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 10 2.5 2 1 0 2 5 TomTom Cardio Runner
Garmin 225 Review 9 2.9 1 1 0 2 5 Garmin 225
Epson SF-510 Review 6 3 0 0 0 2 4 Epson SF-510
Epson SF-810 Review 6 2.3 1 0 0 2 3 Epson SF-810
Garmin 10 Review 2 0.9 0 0 0 0 2 Garmin 10 (Est.

4.2 Score Breakdown with a Standard Footpod

Review Score Value for money6 How far did
you run?1
How fast are
you running?2
Where are
you?3
What's your
cadence?4
Bonus Points5 class="unsortable" |

Price at Amazon.com

Garmin Fenix 5X Review 32 2.3 1 4 9 10 8 Fenix 5X
Garmin Epix Review 31 3.9 0 4 9 10 8 Garmin Epix
Garmin 920XT Review 30 4.7 1 4 7 10 8 Garmin 920XT without HRM
Garmin 935 Review 30 3 1 4 7 10 8 Garmin 935
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 29 4.1 8 3 6 6 6 Suunto Ambit3 Peak
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 28 3.1 2 1 7 10 8 Fenix 3
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 27 5.5 8 3 5 6 5 Suunto Ambit3 Run
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 27 2.3 8 2 6 6 5 Suunto Spartan Ultra
Garmin 910XT Review 26 6.1 5 4 6 6 5 Garmin 910XT without HRM
Polar V800 Review 26 2.8 9 4 3 6 4 Polar V800 without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 Review 25 4.3 4 3 6 6 6 Suunto Ambit2
Garmin 310XT Review 24 8.3 7 4 4 4 5 Garmin 310XT without HRM
Garmin 620 Review 24 5.1 3 2 2 10 7 Garmin 620 without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 23 3.8 4 3 5 6 5 Suunto Ambit2 R without HRM
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 23 3.7 5 4 4 6 4 Suunto Spartan Trainer
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 22 2.7 1 0 6 10 5 Garmin Fenix 2 without HRM
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 21 3.8 0 0 2 10 9 Garmin Vivoactive HR
Garmin 610 Review 20 4.3 3 4 3 6 4 Garmin 610 without HRM
Garmin 235 Review 20 2.8 0 4 2 6 8 Garmin 235
Leikr Review 20 2.5 5 4 4 4 3 Leikr ($380)
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 19 2.9 0 0 4 8 7 Garmin Vivoactive 3
Polar M400 Review 15 4.5 3 1 1 6 4 Polar M400 without HRM
Polar M430 Review 15 2.9 3 1 1 6 4 Polar M430 without HRM
Garmin Vivoactive Review 14 3.4 0 0 0 10 4 Garmin Vivoactive
Garmin 225 Review 13 3.1 1 1 0 6 5 Garmin 225
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 10 2 2 1 0 2 5 TomTom Cardio Runner
Epson SF-510 Review 6 2 0 0 0 2 4 Epson SF-510
Epson SF-810 Review 6 1.6 1 0 0 2 3 Epson SF-810
Garmin 10 Review 2 0.6 0 0 0 0 2 Garmin 10 (Est.

4.3 Score Breakdown with a Stryd Footpod

Review Score Value for money6 How far did
you run?1
How fast are
you running?2
Where are
you?3
What's your
cadence?4
Bonus Points5 class="unsortable" |

Price at Amazon.com

Garmin Epix Review 47 4.5 10 10 9 10 8 Garmin Epix
Garmin Fenix 5X Review 47 2.9 10 10 9 10 8 Fenix 5X
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 45 3.8 10 10 7 10 8 Fenix 3
Garmin 935 Review 45 3.6 10 10 7 10 8 Garmin 935
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 40 4.9 10 10 1 10 9 Garmin Vivoactive HR
Garmin 920XT Review 39 4.4 10 10 1 10 8 Garmin 920XT without HRM
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 37 2.6 10 10 6 6 5 Suunto Spartan Ultra
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 36 4 10 10 1 8 7 Garmin Vivoactive 3
Garmin Vivoactive Review 34 5.1 10 10 0 10 4 Garmin Vivoactive
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 34 3.9 10 10 4 6 4 Suunto Spartan Trainer
Polar V800 Review 33 2.8 10 10 3 6 4 Polar V800 without HRM
Suunto Ambit2 Review 32 3.9 10 10 6 0 6 Suunto Ambit2
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 32 3.4 10 10 6 0 6 Suunto Ambit3 Peak
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 31 2.9 10 10 6 0 5 Garmin Fenix 2 without HRM
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 30 4 10 10 5 0 5 Suunto Ambit3 Run
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 30 3.5 10 10 5 0 5 Suunto Ambit2 R without HRM
Garmin 235 Review 28 2.9 10 10 0 0 8 Garmin 235
Garmin 620 Review 27 3.8 10 10 0 0 7 Garmin 620 without HRM
Garmin 910XT Review 26 3.9 10 10 1 0 5 Garmin 910XT without HRM
Garmin 310XT Review 25 4.6 10 10 0 0 5 Garmin 310XT without HRM
Polar M400 Review 25 4.3 10 10 1 0 4 Polar M400 without HRM
Garmin 225 Review 25 3.8 10 10 0 0 5 Garmin 225
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 25 3.3 10 10 0 0 5 TomTom Cardio Runner
Polar M430 Review 25 3.2 10 10 1 0 4 Polar M430 without HRM
Garmin 610 Review 24 3.3 10 10 0 0 4 Garmin 610 without HRM
Leikr Review 10 1 5 2 0 0 3 Leikr ($380)
Epson SF-510 Review 4 0.7 0 0 0 0 4 Epson SF-510
Epson SF-810 Review 4 0.6 1 0 0 0 3 Epson SF-810
Garmin 10 Review 2 0.3 0 0 0 0 2 Garmin 10 (Est.

4.4 Basic Features

Review

Released GPS
Accuracy
Weight (oz) Size (CM3) Display (mm) Resolution (Pixels) Waterproofing Heart Rate
Monitor
Cadence Data Upload
Garmin Epix Review 2015 6.2 3.0 48 29 x 21 (609mm2) 205 x 148 (30.3K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin Fenix 5X Review 2017 5.6 3.5 36 30.5 (round) (731mm2) 240 diameter (45.2K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 2015 6.2 2.9 33 30 (round) (726mm2) 218 diameter (37.3K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin 935 Review 2017 5.6 1.7 24 30.5 (round) (731mm2) 240 diameter (45.2K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 2016 4.9 1.7 19 21 x 29 (609mm2) 148 x 205 (30.3K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin 920XT Review 2014 6.6 2.2 35 29 x 21 (609mm2) 205 x 148 (30.3K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 2017 1.5 17 30.5 (round) (731mm2) 240 diameter (45.2K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
Garmin Vivoactive Review 2015 5.4 1.3 13 29 x 21 (592mm2) 205 x 148 (30.3K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 2017 7.8 2.0 25 24 x 23 (529mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
Suunto Ambit2 Review 2013 7.6 3.1 30 29 (round) (661mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 2014 7.9 2.9 30 29 (round) (661mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 2016 7.1 2.7 38 32 (round) (804mm2) 320 diameter (80.4K total) Good (100m) Yes Internal (Limited Footpod) Yes
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 2014 5.7 3.2 32 31 (round) (755mm2) 70 diameter (3.8K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 2014 7.9 2.5 30 29 (round) (661mm2) 128 x 128 (16.4K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 2013 7.6 2.5 30 29 (round) (661mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Garmin 235 Review 2015 4.9 1.5 19 31 (round) (755mm2) 215 diameter (36.3K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
Garmin 620 Review 2013 7.1 1.5 20 25.4 (round) (507mm2) 180 diameter (25.4K total) Good (50m) Yes Internal/Footpod/Heart Rate Monitor/Alert Yes
Garmin 910XT Review 2011 7.5 2.5 49 33 x 20 (660mm2) 160 x 100 (16K total) Good (50m) Yes Footpod/Alert Yes
Garmin 310XT Review 2009 7.5 2.5 63 33 x 20 (660mm2) 160 x 100 (16K total) Good (50m) Yes Footpod Yes
Garmin 225 Review 2015 6.2 1.5 24 25.4 (round) (507mm2) 180 diameter (25.4K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 2015 6.0 2.2 30 22 x 25 (550mm2) 144 x 168 (24.2K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
Polar V800 Review 2014 8.0 2.8 31 23 x 23 (529mm2) 128 x 128 (16.4K total) Good (30m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Polar M430 Review 2017 7.2 2.0 24 23 x 23 (529mm2) 128 x 128 (16.4K total) Good (50m) Yes (+OHRM) Internal/Footpod Yes
Polar M400 Review 2014 6.6 2.0 24 23 x 23 (529mm2) 128 x 128 (16.4K total) Good (30m) Yes Internal/Footpod Yes
Garmin 610 Review 2011 7.3 2.5 41 25.4 (round) (507mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Fair (IPX7) Yes Footpod/Alert Yes
Leikr Review 2013 7.3 2.4 25 41 x 31 (1271mm2) 206 x 148 (76.8K total) Fair (IPX6) Yes Footpod Limited
Epson SF-510 Review 2015 4.4 1.7 24 28 x 22 (616mm2) 128 x 96 (12.3K total) Good (50m) Yes Limited Internal Limited
Epson SF-810 Review 2015 5.5 1.8 28 28 (round) (616mm2) 128 diameter (12.9K total) Good (50m) OHRM Only) Limited Internal Limited
Garmin 10 Review 2012 3.8 1.3 33 25 x 24 (600mm2) 55 x 32 (1.8K total) Good (50m) No No Yes



Review

Battery
Life (hr)
Tested Battery
Life (hr)
Extended
Battery
Life (hr)
Charge On The Run? Training
Effect
HRV GPS cache Sensors
Garmin Epix Review 24 17.6 50 Yes (with USB=Garmin) Yes Record Yes Ant+
Garmin Fenix 5X Review 20 23 35 Yes, but can't be worn Yes Record Yes Bluetooth/Ant+
Garmin Fenix 3 Review 20 22 50 Yes (with USB=Garmin) Yes No Yes Ant+
Garmin 935 Review 24 24.5 60 Yes, but can't be worn Yes Record Yes Bluetooth/Ant+
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review 13 13 Yes (with USB=Garmin) No No Yes Ant+
Garmin 920XT Review 24 19 40 No (terminates) Yes Record Yes Ant+
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review 13 13 No Yes Bluetooth/Ant+
Garmin Vivoactive Review 10 10 10 Yes (with USB=Garmin) No No Yes Ant+
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review 10 11 30 Yes Yes No Yes Bluetooth
Suunto Ambit2 Review 15 50 Yes Yes Record Yes Ant+
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review 20 100 Yes Yes Record Yes Bluetooth
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review 18 17 26 Yes, but can't be worn Yes Record Yes Bluetooth
Garmin Fenix 2 Review 15 50 Yes (with USB=Garmin) Yes No Yes Ant+
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review 10 10.5 100 Yes Yes Record Yes Bluetooth
Suunto Ambit2 R Review 8 7.3 25 Yes Yes Record Yes Ant+
Garmin 235 Review 11 11 Yes, but no optical HR Yes No Yes Ant+
Garmin 620 Review 10 10 No (resets) Yes Record Yes Ant+
Garmin 910XT Review 20 20 Yes, but no display Yes Record No Ant+
Garmin 310XT Review 20 20 Yes, but no display No No No Ant+
Garmin 225 Review 10 11 10 No (resets) No No Yes Ant+
TomTom Cardio Runner Review 8 6.3 8 No (resets) No No Yes Bluetooth HR
Polar V800 Review 13 24 50 No (terminates) Yes Display Predictive Bluetooth
Polar M430 Review 8 8 8 No No No Yes Bluetooth
Polar M400 Review 8 8 Yes, but can't be worn No No No Bluetooth
Garmin 610 Review 8 8 Yes, but no display Yes Record No Ant+
Leikr Review 5 6.5 5 Yes, but can't be worn No No Yes (few hours) Ant+
Epson SF-510 Review 30 30 30 No No No Yes (few hours) Bluetooth HR
Epson SF-810 Review 20 26 20 No No No Yes (few hours) None
Garmin 10 Review 5 5 No No No No None

5 Navigation Features

Review

Color Maps Breadcrumbs Courses To Waypoint Compass Reverse course Beeline to start Connect IQ Altimeter
Garmin Epix Review Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Garmin Fenix 5X Review Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
Garmin Fenix 3 Review No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Garmin 935 Review No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
Garmin Vivoactive HR Review No No No No No No No Yes Yes
Garmin 920XT Review No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Review No No No No No No No No No
Garmin Vivoactive Review No No No No No No Yes Yes No
Suunto Spartan Trainer Review No No No No No No Yes No No
Suunto Ambit2 Review No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Suunto Ambit3 Peak Review No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Suunto Spartan Ultra Review No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Garmin Fenix 2 Review No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes
Suunto Ambit3 Run Review No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Suunto Ambit2 R Review No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Garmin 235 Review No No No No No No Yes Yes No
Garmin 620 Review No No No No No No No No No
Garmin 910XT Review No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes
Garmin 310XT Review No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No
Garmin 225 Review No No No No No No No No No
TomTom Cardio Runner Review No No No No No No No No No
Polar V800 Review No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes
Polar M430 Review No No No No No No Yes No No
Polar M400 Review No No No No No No Yes No No
Garmin 610 Review No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No
Leikr Review Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No
Epson SF-510 Review No No No No No No No No No
Epson SF-810 Review No No No No No No No No No
Garmin 10 Review No No No No No No No No No

For "navigation":

  • Color Maps gives you full color maps, rather like a smart phone, with roads and paths marked out.
  • Track Outline is a display of where you've run, rather like a breadcrumb trail. If there are maps, the outline is superimposed otherwise this is just the outline on its own without any context.
  • Course Outline is an outline of a route that can be downloaded. I've found this useful during ultras or in unfamiliar cities where I've needed to know where to go.
  • Back To Start is a simple arrow point to your starting point, so it won't help you backtrack.
  • Back To Waypoint returns you to a previously marked location using a simple arrow to point.
  • Compass. A magnetic compass can help you orient yourself or the map. Without a magnetic compass you have to be moving for the GPS to give you a sense of direction.


(Older Reviews: Polar RC3 GPS, Soleus 1.0, Motorola Motoactv.)