8,137
edits
Changes
no edit summary
! Score
! How far did<br/>
you run?<sup>1</sup>
! How fast are<br/>
you running?<sup>2</sup>! Where are<br/>you?<sup>3</sup>! What's your<br/>cadence?<sup>4</sup>! Bonus Points<sup>5</sup>! Value for money<sup>6</sup>
! class="unsortable" |
Price at Amazon.com
| {{Garmin 10 without HRM}}
|}
The score is the sum of how well each watch can answer the four basic questions (how far, how fast, where are you, what's your cadence), plus some bonus points. # How far you've run assumes using GPS only and is based only on [[GPS accuracy]], not using a [[Footpod]] or [[Stryd]].# How fast you're running assumes you're using a Footpod if it's supported, otherwise the rating is 0-2 based on GPS accuracy. # The "Where are you?" is based on various navigation features such as back to start, breadcrumbs, and preloaded maps. # The cadence score uses 1 point for an internal cadence sensor, 2 points for footpod support, 1 point for support from chest strap cadence, and 1 point for cadence alerts. # I give 1-2 bonus points for application support and 1-2 bonus points for Optical Heart Rate Monitoring. # Value for money is the score divided by the price (at the time I last updated the table.) Your needs may be different, so you might weight the different aspects of the watches differently, or be basing your decision on different criteria totally. Hopefully this table will give you a good starting point for your decision. <br/> (Older Reviews: [[Polar RC3 GPS]], [[Soleus 1.0]], [[Motorola Motoactv]].)
=Features=
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:80%"