Difference between revisions of "Best Running Headphones"
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) |
User:Fellrnr (User talk:Fellrnr | contribs) m |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Options to Consider== | ==Options to Consider== | ||
===Apple Remote Control Earbuds=== | ===Apple Remote Control Earbuds=== | ||
− | The sound quality is mediocre, but the remote control is wonderful, when it works. Given the problems, they are expensive. [http://go.fellrnr.com?id=35454X937677&xs=1&url= | + | The sound quality is mediocre, but the remote control is wonderful, when it works. Given the problems, they are expensive. [http://go.fellrnr.com?id=35454X937677&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FApple-Earphones-Remote-VERSION-Packaging%2Fdp%2FB004DEPOA0 Apple Remote Control Earbuds at Amazon]. |
'''Pros''' | '''Pros''' | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
===Sennheiser CX 680 === | ===Sennheiser CX 680 === | ||
− | These earbuds work quite well for running. [http:// | + | These earbuds work quite well for running. [http://go.fellrnr.com?id=35454X937677&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSennheiser-CX-680-Earfin-Earbuds%2Fdp%2FB0035JKJ2W Sennheiser CX 680 earbuds at Amazon]. |
'''Pros''' | '''Pros''' |
Revision as of 17:59, 20 July 2012
These are the headphones that produce the best sound for the money and work well when running, as well as some alternatives to consider.
Contents
1 Highly Recommended
1.1 Koss Portapro/Sportapro
These headphones produce remarkable sound for the price and these are the headphones I wear when running. The Sportapro fit slightly better for running, but the Portapro have slightly better sound quality. PortaPro at Amazon and SportaPro at Amazon.
Pros
- Wonderful sound quality, which is far better than any earbuds I’ve tried, including expensive options like Shure.
- An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
- The headband allows you to remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you don’t have to pause the music.
- They do not fit under a winter hat, but they work fine over the top of the hat.
- These headphones lasted longer than any others I've tried, dieing after 14 months of continual usage. They also have a lifetime warranty so Koss will replace them for a $9 shipping fee.
Cons
- In hot weather, the pads keep your ears from getting the cool air.
- The looks will not suit everyone.
- Do not work under a cycling helmet.
1.2 Koss KSC75
These have similar sound to the Sportapro and are cheaper. I use these when cycling (not on the road). KSC75 at Amazon.
Pros
- Wonderful sound quality, though not quite as good as the Sportapros, though the difference is small.
- An open design, so you can hear what’s going on around you at low volumes.
- Works under a cycling helmet.
Cons
- You can’t remove and replace the headphones quickly and easily, so you have to pause the music.
- The looks will not suit everyone.
2 Options to Consider
2.1 Apple Remote Control Earbuds
The sound quality is mediocre, but the remote control is wonderful, when it works. Given the problems, they are expensive. Apple Remote Control Earbuds at Amazon.
Pros
- Remote control on the wire.
Cons
- Poor sound quality.
- Appalling build quality. They need modifying to be useful running and even then will not last long. (NB, I've tried remote control adapters for the Apple iPod, but they don't last long either.)
- Don’t stay in the ears without Innovelis BudFits
2.2 Shure Earbuds
I’ve tried several of the cheaper (~$100) Shure earbuds and they don’t work for me, but YMMV.
Pros
- Good sound quality for an earbud when stationary.
Cons
- When sealed against the ear (which is needed for good sound), each footstep ‘booms’. This made them unusable to me.
- Expensive for the sound quality (Koss are better and cheaper)
2.3 Sennheiser CX 680
These earbuds work quite well for running. Sennheiser CX 680 earbuds at Amazon.
Pros
- They stay in the ears quite well when running.
Cons
- Sound quality is mediocre.